Camunda vs TIBCO iProcess Suite comparison

Camunda and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #41. Camunda holds a 21.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,240 Views
14,235 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Read 2 TIBCO iProcess Suite reviews

311 Views
212 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

TIBCO iProcess Suite and Camunda are competing in the Business Process Management arena. Camunda seems to have the upper hand due to its feature set and functionality, offering a more compelling solution worth the investment.

Features: TIBCO iProcess Suite is recognized for its integration capabilities, robust support, and process automation tools, making it ideal for complex workflow management. Camunda provides an open-source platform, developer-friendly environment, and offers greater customization and flexibility, making its feature-rich environment adaptable for businesses seeking versatile solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TIBCO iProcess Suite provides thorough deployment support, streamlining integration within an enterprise’s ecosystem which is particularly advantageous for large organizations. Camunda's open-source model offers flexibility but may require more technical expertise for deployment. Camunda's community-based assistance supports agile teams in rapidly evolving environments.

Pricing and ROI: TIBCO iProcess Suite has lower initial setup costs, appealing for budget-conscious enterprises, while offering straightforward scalability. Camunda promises higher ROI with scalable, efficient solutions accommodating complex processes and business expansion over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

TIBCO iProcess Suite

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 21.3%, up from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO iProcess Suite is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Samy Abushanab

Senior Software Development Team Leader at sejel

An easy-to-use solution with great integration

It involves a lot of investment. The learning curve is not similar to other products, like K2. Regarding the user interface, I have to access workflows and define and manage the processes on the variant of a Windows application, which is not accessible if you don't have access from the client to install it on the workstation. And most of the solutions we're currently evaluating are web-based. Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing. It has lots of elements. It's not user-intuitive compared to other products. Other than that, the licensing model is our main concern.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."

"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."

"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."

"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."

"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."

More Camunda pros

"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."

Cons

"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."

"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."

"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."

"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."

"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."

"The latency of API could be decreased."

"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."

"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."

More Camunda cons

"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

"We're using the open-source version for now."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"There were some features that were only available in the paid version."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"The price could definitely be lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 12% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Apache Airflow vs TIBCO iProcess Suite

Compared 100% of the time

More TIBCO iProcess Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

March 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

March 2025

Download TIBCO iProcess Suite product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

iProcess Suite

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

TIBCO iProcess Suite is a proven and comprehensive suite of business process management (BPM) software that enables organizations to streamline the internal and external processes and tasks that span and make up their business.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Delta Air Lines, Detroit Water and Sewerage, DVLA, E-Plus, FedEx, Geisinger Health System, ING Turkey, Kempen & Co., KPN, LCL, Merck, Merial

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

March 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.