Catchpoint vs Instana Dynamic APM comparison

Catchpoint and Instana are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Catchpoint is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0, while Instana is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.1. Catchpoint holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Instana’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Instana users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,020 Views
614 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Instana Dynamic APM

Read 14 Instana Dynamic APM reviews

2,557 Views
2,119 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Instana Dynamic APM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Catchpoint and Instana Dynamic APM are two well-known products in the application performance monitoring space. Users are generally happier with the pricing and support of Catchpoint, but Instana Dynamic APM is favored for its advanced features and is considered worth the higher cost.

Features: Catchpoint is highly rated for its real-time monitoring capabilities and comprehensive alerting system. Users also value its extensive dashboard customization. Instana Dynamic APM stands out for its automated microservices visibility, AI-powered root cause analysis, and automatic dependency mapping.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint users mention that reporting templates could be more user-friendly, seek better integration with third-party tools, and need more reporting flexibility. Instana users highlight the need for improved documentation, more robust container monitoring, and better initial setup guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint offers a cloud-based deployment model that users find straightforward, with strong customer service and support. Instana leverages automated deployment but requires more initial setup, benefiting from better automation while needing strong initial support.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint has a more attractive pricing structure with a quicker ROI according to user reviews. Instana, although more expensive, justifies its cost through advanced features that lead to long-term gains. Users believe that Catchpoint offers immediate value, but Instana's comprehensive feature set provides better long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Instana Dynamic APM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Instana Dynamic APM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

40th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (9th)

Instana Dynamic APM

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Instana Dynamic APM is 1.0%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Carl Funk

Senior Manager at a training & coaching company with 10,001+ employees

The UI is well designed, so it's easy to get the visibility you want.

There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing. The other issue is the cost. The more data you collect, the more expensive it becomes. You sell your organization by saying we can get this feature set, but then you have to walk that back because we'll need more money to run every test. This is something hard to get out in your initial scoping. You provide Catchpoint with a series of tests and get a cost estimate, not realizing all the data you might have to collect long term. That was a big deal for us because we partly switched on the promise of saving money.

Read full review

Muhammad Jawwad Hassan

IT Consultant at Arcana Info

A really good GUI that is easy for non-technical users to understand

Our company uses the solution for one of our bank clients. We use App Connect middleware to monitor services and applications such as Docker, Kubernetes, MongoDB, and MS SQL Server. We also monitor the bottleneck for all servers. We currently have 20 users at one of our branches. We plan to expand…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn."

"During business hours, it has worked absolutely fine without any issues."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

More Catchpoint pros

"With Instana, the interface and the UI are very simple to use."

"If a key monitored value has crossed a threshold, it sends out an alert. And the solution is able to intelligently find out if something is beyond the range that it normally resides in."

"It is a stable solution."

"The overall capabilities are the most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Instana Dynamic APM is auto-instrumentation."

"We can easily perform root cause analysis using the tool."

"Visually, it's very good. It provides everything needed for dynamic detection, which is very useful."

"Sometimes it's able to provide a proper RCA on its own. It's able to correlate different events that occurred and that becomes like an RCA in itself."

More Instana Dynamic APM pros

Cons

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"A large selection of nodes are available but it is a challenge to test reliably in China and the Middle East."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

More Catchpoint cons

"Its SLI and SLA features need improvement in setting up alerts."

"I think that Instana should improve the university and the certification process, so the users can find experts in Instana with their certification module process."

"Maybe log monitoring could be better."

"The solution's monitoring is pretty weak and should be improved."

"We'd always like to see additional functionalities."

"The auto-remediation features must be improved."

"While it is already quite good, there is room for improvement in terms of providing better functionality"

"The integration could be improved with more plugins or open API."

More Instana Dynamic APM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"Its pricing isn't a big pain point. Its pricing seems to be better than some of the other competing products in the market, but they also have some of the features and functionalities that are better than Instana."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to other products."

"Instana Dynamic APM is more affordable for small and medium-sized companies compared to other vendors."

"Pricing is quite competitive. Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic were all several times more expensive than Instana, both the on-prem and the SaaS versions. Price-wise they are a lot more competitive than anyone else out there."

"The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors."

"It's reasonably priced and manageable, especially for individuals who grasp the significance of application monitoring."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

53%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive simila...

See all answers

What do you like most about Instana Dynamic APM?

The platform’s most valuable feature is the ability to monitor the performance of containers for request and response analysis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Instana Dynamic APM?

I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Instana Dynamic APM?

Sometimes, the issue arises from user changes, such as adjusting firewall settings without proper consideration, leading to compatibility issues within the network monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 24% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 18% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Dynatrace vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 46% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Instana Dynamic APM

Compared 5% of the time

More Instana Dynamic APM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

April 2025

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Instana Dynamic APM

April 2025

Download Instana Dynamic APM product report

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Instana’s Enterprise Observability Platform, powered by automated Application Performance Monitoring, discovers and maps all services, infrastructure, and their inter-dependencies automatically. Instana ingests all observability metrics, traces each request, profiles every process, and updates application dependency maps in real-time to deliver the context and actionable feedback needed by Dev+Ops to optimize application performance, enable innovation, and mitigate risk to help them add value and efficiency to the pipeline. Learn more at https://instana.com.

Instana

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Daxko Lifts Fitness Studios Through COVID Regulations with Quick Engineering PivotsAltissia Meets SLAs to Support Student DeadlinesImmocloud Unlocks Observability to Modernize Real EstateEnento Group Boosts Service Reliability with Real-Time Visibility into Application Performance Instana’s Observability for Amazon EKS Helps Yara Deliver Digital Farming Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Instana Dynamic APM

April 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Instana Dynamic APM

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Instana Dynamic APM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Instana Dynamic APM report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.