Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs Mimecast Email Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Check Point's software delivers significant ROI, reduces spam, and enhances security, though ROI varies with organizational operations.
Sentiment score
5.5
Users have mixed ROI views on Mimecast Email Security, noting its effectiveness against threats but questioning cost-efficiency.
Since deploying Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade, we are blocking around 70 to 80% of spam and phishing attempts at the gateway.
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Security management is also very good and the smart console provides centralized logging and alerts and reports, and easier policy enforcement with correlation with other threats, such as firewall.
Program Lead at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade saves time from an IT and technical perspective, as I am not wasting my time checking for any malicious emails in user inboxes because they are already being blocked by Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade.
Technical Specialist at VDA Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd.
There is definitely a return on investment when using Mimecast, as it blocks phishing emails, reducing the risk of significant financial losses.
Senior Tech. Lead at WE
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.8
Check Point Anti-Spam offers knowledgeable support but varies in response times and thoroughness, with overall user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
5.6
Mimecast Email Security support is helpful but has mixed reviews due to delays and reliance on indirect solutions.
They have excellent knowledge and troubleshoot issues effectively.
System Admin at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
Sometimes the Check Point support has issues as they do not respond immediately when I log a ticket and sometimes they lag.
IT admin at Tonboimaging india pvt ltd
The customer support is good as the TAC team is knowledgeable.
Program Lead at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
Support personnel are hesitant to engage in remote sessions, preferring to share documentation via email.
Senior Tech. Lead at WE
Mimecast technical support is generally quite good.
Information Security Analyst at Enfield Central Library
I would rate my experience with technical support of Mimecast Email Security between seven and eight out of ten for their support.
Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Check Point software scales for diverse needs, integrates seamlessly, handles more traffic efficiently, but may incur high costs.
Sentiment score
7.0
Mimecast Email Security is praised for adaptability and scalability, supporting various industries despite minor feature challenges.
The scalability is excellent because it provides real-time licenses for the mailboxes I want to scan.
Security Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees
The scalability of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is superb, deserving 10 out of 10.
IT admin at Tonboimaging india pvt ltd
As our traffic has grown, the solution scales smoothly by simply adjusting the gateway resources and license.
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
If Mimecast Email Security introduces API solutions, it will dominate the market.
Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Anti-Spam is highly praised for its stability, seamless operation, and compatibility, ensuring uninterrupted user experiences.
Sentiment score
7.5
Mimecast Email Security is reliable and stable, with minimal glitches, occasional delays, and high user ratings for performance.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is very stable and reliable for me.
Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is stable because the false positive rate is lower compared to others.
Program Lead at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
They confirm it's a good solution where only one or two rare emails get through, while the rest are properly blocked without any issues.
Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point's Anti-Spam software struggles with interface complexity, configuration, support, pricing, reporting features, and platform integration improvements.
Mimecast Email Security needs improvements in pricing, detection, complexity, user interface, support, and reducing false positives and attachment issues.
The interface is a bit overwhelming with information overload for someone new to it.
Security Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees
More documentation for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade would be helpful to help new users get started more easily.
Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
A more real-time dashboard would make it easier, and while the detection is strong, false positive tuning is sometimes needed as occasional legitimate emails get flagged as spam and phishing.
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
A lot of emails were missed despite being known samples.
Senior Tech. Lead at WE
Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competition in the Indian market.
Co-Founder & VP-Sales at QuantumShield Technologies LLP
We discussed the phishing aspect, the DNS system, and the key rotation.
Senior Security Engineer at ManpowerGroup
 

Setup Cost

Check Point offers cost-effective, scalable email security with flexible pricing, easy deployment, and potential discounts for multi-year commitments.
Mimecast Email Security is often seen as costly due to user-based licensing and added fees, despite potential discounts.
The setup cost is a little expensive.
Security Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees
The setup cost was minimal beyond the gateway itself.
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit on the higher side, but it gives a strong return on investment.
Program Lead at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
The pricing is higher for Mimecast, particularly for the Indian market, where it is considered expensive.
Senior Tech. Lead at WE
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Anti-Spam Software enhances email security with threat detection, phishing protection, and user-friendly interfaces, boosting productivity.
Mimecast Email Security offers strong threat protection, easy setup, seamless Microsoft 365 integration, and excellent scalability and support.
The most valuable feature for me is real-time detection and remediation.
Security Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees
The real-time threat intelligence and advanced phishing detection make a big difference in our day-to-day work because since deploying them, we have seen a noticeable drop in the phishing emails reaching end-user inboxes, which reduces the number of security incidents that we need to investigate and saves time for the SOC team.
Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
This solution helps us stop spams, phishing, malicious attachments, email-based threats, and attacks on mail infrastructure.
Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
A distinct advantage of Mimecast is its ability to block phishing and impostor attacks, which are significant threats currently.
Senior Tech. Lead at WE
One of the most useful features is the threat remediation module, which can be used to remove malicious emails that may have been delivered or manually remove them.
Information Security Analyst at Enfield Central Library
Mimecast Email Security includes the best gateway solution across all Cisco, Trend Micro, and other solutions.
Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Anti-Spam and E...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (8th)
Mimecast Email Security
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Office 365 Protection (3rd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Messaging and Collaboration solutions, they serve different purposes. Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is designed for Email Security and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, down 0.7% compared to last year.
Mimecast Email Security, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Email Gateway (SEG), holds 14.4% mindshare, up 12.5% since last year.
Email Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade0.7%
Microsoft Defender for Office 3659.6%
Proofpoint Email Protection7.9%
Other81.8%
Email Security
Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Mimecast Email Security14.4%
Microsoft Defender for Office 36524.2%
Proofpoint Email Protection20.3%
Other41.099999999999994%
Secure Email Gateway (SEG)
 

Featured Reviews

AimanSayyed - PeerSpot reviewer
Program Lead at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
Has significantly reduced phishing threats through proactive monitoring and centralized visibility
A specific example of how Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade helps protect my organization from spam or phishing is when I log in to my management console of the Check Point tool and I open the email security blade logs, and I see all the overnight status of spam, what was the spam message volume, how many phishing attempts were made, and what kind of attachments were quarantined. This gives a real-time threat intelligence and advanced detection of phishing attacks. Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade offers a very easy-to-use dashboard and a proactive approach. Whatever trends are observed will directly inform us. The dashboard is very easy to understand. It gives a spam detection summary where it provides a visual representation through pie or bar graphs for spam suspected or clean mails. I also really appreciate the quarantine summary as it is very descriptive and gives a quick insight into the user complaints, compliance, and backlog. The system health, such as the CPU and update types of status of signatures, is also very well represented, so it does not cause any overload. Integration with SIEM or SOC dashboards, such as QRadar which we use in the organization, is very easy via Syslog exports. This gives centralized visibility, so you do not need to check with all the other devices as one device will give you a centralized overview. Smart events are also very configurable and will give us notifications or mitigation actions, which is beneficial.
RP
Senior Tech. Lead at WE
Block significant threats with enhanced phishing prevention
In terms of efficacy, Proofpoint is better than Mimecast, though it's a little difficult to manage. A distinct advantage of Mimecast is its ability to block phishing and impostor attacks, which are significant threats currently. Security is a major feature where email security tools like Mimecast have delivered value by identifying and preventing phishing emails.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Wholesaler/Distributor
5%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?
At this time, I do not see anything lacking in Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade. It is working fine for my organization and providing an excellent solution and security.
What is your primary use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?
My main use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is to protect document or file links attached through emails, and I have applied a security rule so that no malicious ma...
What advice do you have for others considering Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?
Any organization looking for the best email security solution should consider Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade as one of the leading solutions currently present in the IT dom...
What do you like most about Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?
The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy.
What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?
Mimecast Email Security can be improved by adding some API integrations. Instead of remaining a traditional gateway, Mimecast Email Security needs to provide API solutions similar to Check Point.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SF Police Credit Union (SFPCU)
Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs. Mimecast Email Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2024.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.