Cisco Identity Services Engine and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform compete in the network access control and endpoint security space. ThreatLocker seems to have an upper hand with its simplified endpoint protection and responsive customer service.
Features: Cisco ISE is designed for network access control and integrates well with Cisco's ecosystem and security protocols. It offers posture assessment, policy management, and 802.1X support, making it ideal for environments with existing Cisco infrastructure. ThreatLocker focuses on zero trust security, providing application control, ring-fencing, and streamlined application allowlisting.
Room for Improvement: Cisco ISE users report complex deployment and a steep learning curve, along with a cumbersome GUI. Simplified upgrades and better cross-platform integration are desired. ThreatLocker needs improved training options and staggered policy updates to prevent network saturation, along with a more refined user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco ISE supports on-premises and hybrid deployments but faces challenges with its complex setup. While it benefits from Cisco’s extensive support network, customer service experiences vary. ThreatLocker offers flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud, earning praise for its quick responsiveness and expert support, though its availability could be broader.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco ISE's pricing is considered high with a complicated licensing model moving toward subscriptions, potentially limiting for smaller organizations. Despite the cost, it delivers strong ROI through network security and compliance. ThreatLocker offers reasonable pricing, significant value, and ROI by minimizing security risks and simplifying endpoint management.
Direct comparisons with Forescout reveal up to 30% to 40% difference in cost savings.
The measurable benefits of using ThreatLocker include ensuring real-time protection of organizational resources and maintaining user authentication and protection levels to reduce risks.
I rate the technical support as one out of ten.
Sometimes it's challenging to identify which support team is responsible for certain issues, which is a significant concern.
ThreatLocker's technical support process could be streamlined by reducing the number of steps required to reach a human agent.
It could be better, especially with response times.
Factors like architecture, business nature, and legal limitations such as GDPR affect it.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
The stability of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is poor for certain use cases, like authentication.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is considered very reliable and stable.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
Additionally, the product is vulnerable and has many bugs.
Pricing can be more expensive compared to other vendors, and there is a significant price gap observed, which doesn't seem justified by some specific features.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
Compared to other solutions like HPE ClearPass, Cisco is more costly, and the conversation suggests a possible forty percent price gap compared to competitors.
Cloud solutions are expensive, while on-prem setups with shared environments are cheaper but not effective.
The pricing is reasonable and normal.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is very good at device administration.
The solution is integrated with other Cisco devices and can offer automation for an organization, making deployments more dynamic and providing real-time visibility.
ThreatLocker's most valuable feature is its scanning capability, which executes all types of executable files.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) offers comprehensive network access control and visibility, supporting features like 802.1X authentication, profiling, and posturing. It integrates with Microsoft and other Cisco products, facilitating robust security policies across distributed networks.
Cisco Identity Services Engine is a key player in network access control, offering centralized management and a user-friendly interface. It supports zero trust principles and provides strong authentication for wired and wireless networks. ISE's capabilities include granular security policies, enhanced device posturing, and seamless integration, bolstering security infrastructure. Users benefit from its dual authentication through EAP, simplifying access management across networks.
What are the key features of Cisco ISE?In industries like finance, healthcare, and education, Cisco ISE is pivotal for securing wired and wireless networks, implementing BYOD policies, and managing user access. Organizations leverage ISE for effective authentication and authorization, while maintaining compliance with industry security standards.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
