Cisco Intersight vs NetApp Cloud Insights comparison

Cisco and NetApp are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.2, while NetApp is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Cisco holds a 2.1% mindshare in IM, compared to NetApp’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 13 Cisco Intersight reviews

2,569 Views
2,046 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Insights

Read 12 NetApp Cloud Insights reviews

907 Views
353 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

NetApp Cloud Insights

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Cisco Intersight and NetApp Cloud Insights compete in IT management and monitoring. Cisco has an advantage with its integrated management across multiple environments, while NetApp provides strong analytics and optimization capabilities.

Features: Cisco Intersight includes integrated infrastructure management, orchestration across hybrid environments, and automated device onboarding. NetApp Cloud Insights offers in-depth resource utilization analytics, cost optimization tools, and comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Intersight could enhance its analytics features, improve reporting capabilities, and increase integration options with third-party tools. NetApp Cloud Insights could benefit from better integration with non-NetApp products, streamlined alert management, and enhanced real-time monitoring features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Intersight allows seamless cloud-based deployment with excellent hybrid support, offering flexible customization options. NetApp Cloud Insights provides easy setup and a rich set of monitoring features, with customer service focusing on rapid issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Intersight is appreciated for its competitive pricing, providing value in managing diverse environments. NetApp Cloud Insights, although possibly more expensive, demonstrates significant ROI with its focus on cloud infrastructure optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Intersight vs. NetApp Cloud Insights Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. NetApp Cloud Insights

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (12th)

NetApp Cloud Insights

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 2.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Insights is 0.2%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

ItzikLiberman

System Presale at Bezeq

Provides data center management and full infrastructure visibility

Cisco Intersight is a very effective tool for data center infrastructure management. It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure. We have visibility to other products and storages, some networking. It is also valuable for its integration capabilities with other products.

Read full review

Scott Lauters

Associate IT Director at Wolters Kluwer

It provides a single pane of glass, giving us visibility into the environment

All our production clusters are in Cloud Insight. It provides a single pane of glass, giving us visibility into the environment, which allows us to understand if any issues are going on across any of our clusters. The main issue we were looking to address was the lack of visibility across all the clusters in one single view. We're using Cloud Insight's Unified Manager. It has improved our ability to support and see the immediate status of the entire environment. If we have a critical incident, we can quickly see these issues and loop in monitoring teams and other teams. For example, if our app team thinks there are issues in the environment, we can quickly see if anything related to storage is part of the problem. It improved our organization by unifying all the various support teams. We all have the same view of what's happening in the environment. The dev team knows what storage is used or not, and we can quickly move on to other activities. Cloud Insights provides a single tool for containers and other cloud-based architectures, but we're not using some of those things, such as Kubernetes. We're primarily leveraging the monitoring and reporting. The solution does a great job of inventorying our resources. It allows us to put the tags on the devices. The process is fast. It also gives you the dependencies. I can dig down into all the related components. Cloud Insight's advanced analytics feature does a good job of highlighting the areas where there might be issues in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about Cisco Intersight is its manageability."

"I rate it a ten out of ten. I don't have any issues with it."

"It offers visibility and optimization of workloads, which are very important features for a company."

"The tool helps to manage Cisco servers."

"Provides an overall view using a single portal."

"Intersight offers many features that provide great value to companies."

"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure."

"I like Intersight because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud because Intersight is the IO module."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"The visibility and assistance with security vulnerabilities are valuable."

"NetApp Cloud Insights helps with login monitoring and troubleshooting. Previously, if we had performance concerns or needed to interface with other groups and their products, a task that should require only one or two people turned into a six-person job."

"Among the most valuable features are the queries and reporting that allow us to look at the utilization of resources, at how well the storage is performing, and to report on which resources are being used by which business units. We can track usage across the entire environment, across applications, business units, cost centers, etc."

"One feature we appreciate the most is its ability to take snapshots, which adds an extra layer of security and allows us to protect our data effectively."

"The solution is easy to deploy."

"Cloud Insights' best features are visibility and the connector to move the workloads."

"Cloud Secure is definitely the most valuable feature and being able to see file level activity. It gives real-time alerting on possible ransomware attacks and provides file security review. It helps us to see if something abnormal is happening on the system before it's too late."

"All our production clusters are in Cloud Insight. It provides a single pane of glass, giving us visibility into the environment, which allows us to understand if any issues are going on across any of our clusters."

More NetApp Cloud Insights pros

Cons

"Technical support from Cisco has been mixed. For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX."

"An area for improvement in Cisco Intersight is automation. It needs more automation capabilities. Apart from enhanced automation, I want Cisco Intersight to integrate with third-party monitoring tools in its next release."

"The usability must be better."

"I do not have notes for improvement."

"The product's setup should be easier."

"When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs."

"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."

"There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"In a perfect world we would have something built, right out-of-the-box, that can identify what we call "noise," and reduce the amount of data. You're presented with so much data when you first start the data collectors. For example, it brings back a lot of change rates that happen just because of standard computing, like profile changes and that sort of thing. Being able to identify things like that and categorize them and strip it down—and it probably can do that, I just haven't gotten there yet—would be very beneficial."

"Ease of reporting is one thing that they're trying to tackle. If you have a specific set of data you want from Cloud Insights, you can ask NetApp to help you build the reports from the ground up. The dashboards are intuitive, but finding the report you want is sometimes a challenge. If you don't have the report already loaded, pulling it in and letting it build its data can be cumbersome."

"The support is not very quick."

"The visualization needs some improvement because there are occasional delays while the system queries information."

"When I did need support because I was having problems with the solution, the first or the second line just didn't understand it. They were providing this only on a software as a service basis. So, they were asking all the wrong questions."

"The first level of NetApp's technical support could be improved."

"There is room for improving the creating and managing or modifying of reports. That is still a difficult task to do and requires knowledge beyond the storage itself. I would love to see reporting improved so that we can create reports by dragging and dropping pieces into a report form and publish a report that way."

"Their pricing model needs improvement."

More NetApp Cloud Insights cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cost-effective."

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"We are billed based on management units, so we can purchase units based on six months, twelve months, twenty-four months, or thirty-six months upfront or pay as you go depending on our requirements."

"The licensing model could be improved. We love that you can use it for free for looking at NetApp products. You only need licenses to look at non-NetApp products, but as soon as you do that, you start utilizing licenses that actually would have been free in the public. So, there is a bit of an anomaly in the licensing model."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is based on the device you purchase and includes support services."

"Be aware of the capacity licensing and understand how that works, because it is based on capacity. Getting an understanding of that is the biggest thing."

"The licensing is complex. The calculation depends on what you're ingesting. A terabyte of one product is not a terabyte of another product. Virtual machines don't equate so easily. It's all about the end-use managed units and having an easy place to reference how far those units go."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

36%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

32%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?

Intersight can validate our environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

I do not have notes for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

I use it mostly for managing servers and updating their hardware licenses to get the hardware status in the cloud. Mostly, my customers develop Intersight on-premises because there are many restric...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Insights?

NetApp Cloud Insights helps with login monitoring and troubleshooting. Previously, if we had performance concerns or needed to interface with other groups and their products, a task that should req...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Insights?

The licensing is complex. The calculation depends on what you're ingesting. A terabyte of one product is not a terabyte of another product. Virtual machines don't equate so easily. It's all about t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Insights?

Ease of reporting is one thing that they're trying to tackle. If you have a specific set of data you want from Cloud Insights, you can ask NetApp to help you build the reports from the ground up. T...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco UCS Manager vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 48% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 7% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

Dell CloudIQ vs NetApp Cloud Insights

Compared 62% of the time

Datadog vs NetApp Cloud Insights

Compared 38% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Insights Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

April 2025

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Insights

March 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Insights product report

Also Known As

Intersight

No data available

Overview

Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.

Cisco

NetApp Cloud Insights is an infrastructure monitoring tool that gives you visibility into your complete infrastructure. With Cloud Insights, you can monitor, troubleshoot and optimize all your resources including your public clouds and your private data centers.

NetApp

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. NetApp Cloud Insights

March 2025

Free Report: Cisco Intersight vs. NetApp Cloud Insights

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. NetApp Cloud Insights and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Intersight vs. NetApp Cloud Insights report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.