Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Intersight vs ServiceNow IT Operations Management comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Users quickly achieved ROI with IBM Turbonomic by optimizing resources, reducing costs, and improving performance and efficiency.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
ServiceNow IT Operations Management is cost-effective within months, offering improved asset management and workflow acceleration despite initial expenses.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.8
IBM Turbonomic's customer service is praised for prompt, knowledgeable support and efficient issue resolution, maintaining high overall satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Intersight's customer service is accessible 24/7 and professional but inconsistent in complex issue resolution without specific contracts.
Sentiment score
6.3
ServiceNow IT Operations Management is deemed knowledgeable but needs improvement in response times and consistency for complex issues.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
The response time of technical support could be improved.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM Turbonomic scales effectively, managing large environments and thousands of virtual machines with flexible licensing and strong support.
Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco Intersight is highly rated for scalability, enabling seamless scaling without maintenance; some organizations plan to increase usage.
Sentiment score
7.5
ServiceNow IT Operations Management is scalable and adaptable, ideal for large enterprises, but challenging to downscale geographically.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
IBM Turbonomic is highly stable, with minor issues quickly resolved, maintaining strong performance and reliable recovery from disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.0
Cisco Intersight is mostly stable, but upgrades may cause issues; some versions are preferred for their reliability.
Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow IT Operations Management is stable and reliable, though performance can vary due to configuration and external factors.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Turbonomic needs an updated user interface, enhanced reporting, better documentation, and improved integration with third-party tools.
Cisco Intersight users seek improved integration, hybrid cloud support, hyperscale capabilities, automation, and better usability for diverse infrastructures.
ServiceNow IT Operations Management needs cost reduction, improved integrations, enhanced customization, and a more user-friendly deployment process.
More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware.
We are facing difficulties with service mapping of CIs from the end users, and are seeking help from third-party vendors.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Turbonomic offers flexible, cost-effective pricing, with significant savings over additional VMware hosts; negotiate for tailored deals.
Cisco Intersight provides cost-effective, straightforward licensing with generally positive user feedback, requiring purchase for enhanced control features.
ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers customizable licenses, but perceived high costs lead clients to seek price negotiations.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency through automation, resource optimization, workload management, integration, and efficient cost-performance balance.
Cisco Intersight enhances manageability with seamless integrations, workflow automation, data visibility, and hybrid environment management via a centralized portal.
ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers intuitive asset management, seamless integration, automation, scalability, and user-friendly data visualization.
Intersight offers a simple monitor feature, which can be integrated with other Cisco products, while still providing a solution with another brand.
ServiceNow IT Operations Management is beneficial for the discovery of all CIs in our environment.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Turbonomic
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Management
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (5th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (5th)
Cisco Intersight
Ranking in Cloud Management
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (19th)
ServiceNow IT Operations Ma...
Ranking in Cloud Management
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (8th), AIOps (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 6.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 3.4%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow IT Operations Management is 1.7%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

SubashSubbiah - PeerSpot reviewer
It can tell us where performance is lagging on the hardware layer, but the reporting on the application layer is lacking
The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer. I would like them to add some apps for physical device load resourcing and physical-to-virtual calculation. It gives excellent recommendations for the virtual layer but doesn't have the capabilities for physical-to-virtual analysis. Automated deployment is something else they could add. Some built-in automation features are helpful, but we aren't effectively using a few. We want a few more automated features, like autoscaling and automatic performance optimization testing would be useful.
David Fartouk - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps know whether a solution is deployed correctly, but the automation capabilities are difficult to use
We used the solution's automation capabilities, but it wasn’t easy. It was part of why we took some time to deploy the solution. It didn't give us much value. It wasn't that good. Intersight is a pretty complex solution. It can give you a lot of things, but nothing is simple. The usability must be better.
Archana Menon - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use and has great orchestration and automation capabilities
The solution's initial setup is straightforward. Complexity always comes when the company requirements are added. There is a reason why ServiceNow is a market leader. If they would also bring in the complex nature like their peers, force companies to stick to out-of-the-box all the time, and bring in product customizations or product revisions, which would force other users not to use customization, then it would not stay like that. ServiceNow should not go the same route as other vendors and restrict their products from being scaled up or scaled down.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
41%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is...
What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
The implementation could be enhanced.
What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting...
What do you like most about Cisco Intersight?
Intersight can validate our environment.
What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?
More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware. There is also a need to inc...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?
The most common use case was the HyperFlex deployment in the past. However, with HyperFlex being discontinued, I now ...
What do you like most about ServiceNow IT Operations Management?
From my perspective as an asset manager, the most valuable feature of the solution is the configuration management po...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow IT Operations Management?
I can rate the pricing at six out of ten, as the pricing is reasonable.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow IT Operations Management?
We are facing difficulties with service mapping of CIs from the end users, and are seeking help from third-party vend...
 

Also Known As

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
Intersight
ServiceNow ITOM
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
EXMAR, RapidScale
servicenow, TransAlta, NATS, Symantec
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.