Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Arista is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5. Cisco holds a 11.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Wireless

Read 153 Cisco Wireless reviews

15,312 Views
14,009 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

564 Views
293 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Wireless

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Cisco Wireless and Mojo Networks, now part of Arista, both compete in the wireless networking category. Cisco seems to have the upper hand due to its reliability and integration with other Cisco products, though Mojo Networks offers a more innovative cloud-based solution.

Features: Cisco Wireless includes advanced security, seamless roaming, and centralized management, with reliable coverage and flexible frequency configuration. Mojo Networks excels with its WIPS technology for security, cognitive analytics for insightful data, and a cloud-based architecture for easy deployment.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Wireless could benefit from enhanced cloud capabilities, a simplified GUI, and a more competitive pricing model. Users also seek better third-party product compatibility. Mojo Networks could improve its coverage range and integrate features into a single interface, alongside expanding its API for diagnostics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Wireless operates mainly on-premises with technical support that varies by region. Its customer service is responsive, though regional improvements are needed. Mojo Networks offers flexibility with a hybrid cloud model and is generally well-rated for accessible and knowledgeable technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Wireless is seen as expensive due to licensing complexities, yet offers cost-saving potential through reduced provisioning needs. Mojo Networks is considered a cost-effective alternative with competitive pricing for cloud solutions, providing substantial savings without compromising on quality or features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

153

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless is 11.5%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

GulfrazAhmad

Division Head Enterprise Infrastructure (SVP) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Integrates with ISE, and is secure, reliable, and easy to deploy

The main concern is the length and overlapping. We have to put on four to six access points on the same floor, and we face the issue of overlapping areas. If Cisco can extend the range of their indoor APs, we would need to install just one or two access points, and it would eliminate the problem of the overlapping area. They should provide built-in features for safe authentication. Right now, we integrate with ISE and FortiClient for this feature. We first check the NAC, and after the NAC and before the domain, a token password installed on their mobile or a physical token is required to join the network. If Cisco had built-in authentication, we would be able to eliminate one product from our network.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The installation process is very easy."

"Cisco Wireless is mostly stable with a low downrate and the signal rate is good. It is also easy to use."

"From my experience, I have found Cisco Wireless to be scalable."

"Device profiling allows us to have different policies applied by ISE to wireless clients."

"The features that I have found most valuable with Cisco Wireless is that the average connectivity for this WIFI access point is 2.5 gigabytes. That's the highest technology and highest connectivity. They started using the new technology and WIFI to get you a faster connectivity."

"The solution is easy to use and its stable."

"Cisco Wireless technology allows us to logically segregate networks, to segregate the traffic between multiple types of endpoint devices, connected to the network. For example, corporate laptops are connected to one network, corporate iPhones will go through a different network."

"The product’s stability is great."

More Cisco Wireless pros

"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."

"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."

"The solution is very stable."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."

"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."

"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."

"It has given us a huge leg-up when competing with other managed service providers who use different vendors because of the visibility it gives us to customers' traffic for troubleshooting purposes."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"It's expensive."

"The main concern is the length and overlapping. We have to put on four to six access points on the same floor, and we face the issue of overlapping areas. If Cisco can extend the range of their indoor APs, we would need to install just one or two access points, and it would eliminate the problem of the overlapping area."

"The installation is not too difficult but the solution could improve by making the configuration easier."

"And from an administration point of view, it is a very tedious job to check on each and every control. We have around 30 or 40 controls in our network."

"There is no technology without room for improvement. The main setback with Cisco solutions, not only with Cisco Wireless, is having to update the OS manually. We are now migrating to Miraki, so we've been able to work that out."

"The solution's pricing should be improved."

"The solution doesn't have much coverage area."

"The bind configuration between a physical port and an IP address is missing."

More Cisco Wireless cons

"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"They could use more additional application security and network security features. They could add on to the WiFi as a selling point. It would be nice to be able to say to the WiFi users, "We will protect you against viruses and malware, so you don't have to purchase that.""

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is reasonable."

"There is a need to renew the licenses for Cisco Wireless every three years. My company needs to pay around 25 percent of the budget meant for the tools we purchase towards the price of Cisco Wireless."

"There are no subscription fees."

"Its licensing is not simple. There are additional license costs for features, which is frustrating for us. There are some features that are included for free in the base Aruba product, but they are available at additional costs in this solution."

"The solution is a little expensive compared to other brands."

"The price of Cisco Wireless is expensive and there is an additional cost for support."

"The licensing system is very rigid. I work for a school and we are just treated like big companies. At some point, there's a limit to what we can do about that."

"The price is a little high. However, you get what you pay for. The quality of the product is high, you will find it is worth the money. There is some additional cost, for example, customer support."

More Cisco Wireless pricing and cost advice

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user212721

President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 24, 2015

Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions

Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are availabl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mojo Networks?

It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 30% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 26% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Wireless Competitors

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 42% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 29% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Mojo Networks

Compared 29% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless

April 2025

Download Cisco Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

March 2025

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

Cisco WLAN Controller

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Wireless is a comprehensive suite of wireless solutions designed to deliver secure, high-performance connectivity for enterprises of all sizes. Offering a range of access points, controllers, and advanced management tools, Cisco Wireless ensures seamless and reliable network access, enhancing mobility and productivity.

Cisco Wireless solutions provide robust, scalable wireless networks capable of supporting high-density environments and diverse applications. With features such as seamless roaming, advanced security protocols, and detailed analytics, Cisco Wireless addresses the needs of modern businesses. The solutions include the Cisco Catalyst and Aironet series access points, wireless LAN controllers, and the Cisco DNA Center for centralized management and automation.

What are the key features of Cisco Wireless?

High-Density Performance: Optimized for environments with a high number of devices, ensuring reliable connectivity and performance.
Advanced Security: Incorporates robust security measures such as WPA3, Secure Boot, and segmentation to protect data and devices.
Seamless Roaming: Enables uninterrupted connectivity as users move across different areas within the network.
Centralized Management: Cisco DNA Center provides a single pane of glass for managing and automating wireless networks, enhancing operational efficiency.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports various deployment models, including on-premises, cloud-managed, and hybrid solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Cisco Wireless?

Improved Mobility and Productivity: Users often highlight how Cisco Wireless enhances user mobility and productivity through reliable and consistent connectivity.
Scalability: Reviews frequently mention the scalability of Cisco Wireless, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Ease of Management: Many users appreciate the centralized management capabilities, which simplify network administration and troubleshooting.
Enhanced Security: The advanced security features are often noted for providing peace of mind and compliance with industry standards.
User Experience: The overall user experience, including ease of use and seamless integration with other Cisco products, is a common point of praise.

Cisco Wireless solutions are implemented across various industries, including healthcare, education, retail, and manufacturing. In healthcare, they support critical applications like patient monitoring and electronic health records. Educational institutions use Cisco Wireless to provide reliable internet access for students and staff. Retailers benefit from enhanced customer experiences through in-store connectivity, while manufacturers use wireless networks to improve operational efficiency and automation.

Pricing and licensing for Cisco Wireless solutions are typically based on the scale of deployment and specific product selections. Cisco offers various support plans, including 24/7 customer service, technical support, and access to software updates and patches.

In summary, Cisco Wireless provides robust, scalable wireless networking solutions that enhance connectivity, security, and management for diverse enterprise environments.

Cisco

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.