Clarity SM vs SCSM comparison

SCSM and Clarity SM compete in the IT service management category. Although both have strengths, SCSM seems to have an upper hand in integration with Microsoft products, while Clarity SM offers superior customization capabilities.

Features: SCSM integrates seamlessly with Microsoft products, enhancing its orchestration and automation capacity and providing a strong ticketing system. It supports several ITIL framework modules such as incident and change management. Clarity SM stands out with a highly customizable setup, a robust service catalog, and embedded business process management, making it suitable for complex SLA and KPI calculations. Its service portal is mobile-responsive and comprehensive, ensuring full service management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: SCSM's self-service portal lacks mobile access, and integration with cloud services requires enhancement. Customization of reports and CMDB management also need attention. Clarity SM faces challenges in scaling and real-time reporting, with an outdated user interface that can diminish user experience. There's a need for better cohesion across its modules.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both SCSM and Clarity SM are mainly deployed on-premises, with SCSM offering more flexibility with hybrid and public cloud options. SCSM benefits from strong Microsoft support, albeit sometimes criticized for ineffective resolutions. Clarity SM provides robust customer service but struggles with integration complexity due to its multi-component architecture.

Pricing and ROI: SCSM's pricing is bundled, leading to confusion and potential extra costs from supplementary products despite its affordability compared to competitors. However, it offers a good ROI when fully leveraged. Clarity SM offers both perpetual and subscription licensing models, appearing expensive for small environments but competitive for large organizations due to its scalability and customization abilities. It provides significant ROI when fully utilized.