Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudBees vs TeamCity comparison

CloudBees and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CloudBees is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while JetBrains is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.8. CloudBees holds a 1.1% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudBees users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.
CloudBees
Read 20 CloudBees reviews
  • 770 Views
  • 148 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TeamCity
Read 28 TeamCity reviews
  • 2,185 Views
  • 1,937 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

TeamCity and CloudBees compete in the CI/CD space, catering to automation and deployment needs for development teams. CloudBees seems to have an upper hand due to its enterprise-level support and advanced security features, making it a strong choice for larger enterprises.

Features: TeamCity offers robust build chain configuration, seamless integration, and flexibility with plugins and multi-VCS support, excelling in automated deployments with extensive customization. CloudBees offers scalability for large teams, advanced security features, and manages Jenkins instances effectively with pipeline orchestration and comprehensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could improve its REST API, streamline its complex configuration process, and enhance documentation for new users. CloudBees should address performance issues in large pipelines, simplify its setup process, and improve user-friendliness to enhance overall user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity is effective in on-premises and private cloud environments with strong technical support via forums. CloudBees offers greater flexibility in public cloud setups with professional and enterprise-level customer service channels, providing a robust support network.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity provides a freemium model ideal for scaling, being cost-effective for growing needs despite its relatively higher price. CloudBees, though costly, justifies the expense through comprehensive features and robust security, making it suited for large enterprises with extensive CI/CD needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CloudBees vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CloudBees vs. TeamCity
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,485 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees licensing offers robust ROI with security, support, and automation, enhancing efficiency and trust in production environments.
Sentiment score
8.0
TeamCity enhances build efficiency and deployment across time zones, supporting automation for optimized resource allocation and ROI evaluation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
CloudBees support gets mixed reviews, often praised for responsiveness but criticized for frequent issues and plugin upgrade suggestions.
Sentiment score
7.6
TeamCity's customer service is praised for professionalism, responsive support, comprehensive documentation, and effective community resources despite time zone challenges.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CloudBees efficiently supports scalable multi-environment operations, integrating with architectures like Kubernetes, despite notable resource consumption.
Sentiment score
7.3
TeamCity enables scalable deployments with multiple agents, requiring regular maintenance, effectively supporting large-scale projects and numerous users.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees is generally stable but can encounter issues during upgrades, plugin compatibility, and in complex server environments.
Sentiment score
7.7
TeamCity offers high reliability and stability, with minimal disruptions and effective resource management, despite occasional minor lags.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek CloudBees improvements in speed, integration, GUI, plugins, authentication, reliability, AI integration, and standardized templates.
TeamCity's complex setup, poor UI navigation, and integration issues hinder efficiency, with needs for API, reporting, and alert improvements.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprises favor CloudBees for its core product and security features, accepting high costs due to substantial benefits.
TeamCity offers a developer-focused solution with scalable costs but requires an initial server setup expense despite a free version.
 

Valuable Features

CloudBees enhances CI/CD efficiency with scalability, tool integration, advanced security, cloud support, and seamless Jenkins management.
TeamCity excels in build step flexibility, plugin support, cross-platform capabilities, Git integration, and intuitive usability for efficient pipeline management.
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (3rd), DevSecOps (5th)
TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 7.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
Read full review
Omakoji Idakwoji - PeerSpot reviewer
Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans
I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user184734 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 22, 2015
I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Legal Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
See all answers
What do you like most about TeamCity?
One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?
Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TeamCity?
TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

GitLab vs CloudBees Logo
GitLab vs CloudBees
Compared 56% of the time
Harness vs CloudBees Logo
Harness vs CloudBees
Compared 27% of the time
Tekton vs CloudBees Logo
Tekton vs CloudBees
Compared 16% of the time
More CloudBees Competitors
GitLab vs TeamCity Logo
GitLab vs TeamCity
Compared 35% of the time
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity
Compared 18% of the time
Harness vs TeamCity Logo
Harness vs TeamCity
Compared 15% of the time
CircleCI vs TeamCity Logo
CircleCI vs TeamCity
Compared 9% of the time
Tekton vs TeamCity Logo
Tekton vs TeamCity
Compared 9% of the time
More TeamCity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CloudBees
March 2025
CloudBees reportDownload CloudBees product report
Buyer's Guide
TeamCity
March 2025
TeamCity reportDownload TeamCity product report
 

Overview

CloudBees DevOptics is a robust software utilized primarily to enhance CI/CD processes by offering real-time visibility into Jenkins pipelines. It facilitates effective monitoring, incident management, and decision-making through comprehensive data analysis. Users value its features like DevOps performance metrics and seamless tool integration, leading to improved operational efficiency and productivity in organizations.

CloudBees

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains
 

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Buyer's Guide
CloudBees vs. TeamCity
March 2025
Free Report: CloudBees vs. TeamCity
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CloudBees vs. TeamCity report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.