Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Code42 Incydr vs Teramind comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr is highly scalable and integrates seamlessly, with minor setup issues but reliable performance for growing and established businesses.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr is user-friendly, offers continuous backups, excellent visibility for remote workforces, and customizable risk-scoring with minimal resource use.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr could enhance support, efficiency, and features, especially for newcomers and those relying on content-specific filtering.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr is highly reliable and stable, with users rarely encountering any issues, bugs, crashes, or glitches.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Code42 Incydr's customer service is highly praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, clear communication, expert support, and comprehensive resources.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Code42 Incydr
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
26th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (55th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (53rd)
Teramind
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
39th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (5th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Code42 Incydr is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teramind is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support
In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.
Dinesh Kaarthik - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution that provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console
If a person wants to use a DLP product, they must know what data they want to protect and how to block, allow, and monitor data. We will not have any issues if the policies are correct and the user is authorized to perform the actions. Uninstalling is also pretty quick. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
If you come with the perception that this solution uses the same policies that are used in traditional DLP products, you might find Code42 doesn't work for you. You have to adapt to their philosoph...
What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?
The solution has been designed for a different approach than the one followed by other DLP solutions in the market. Most of us who come from the mindset of filtering out incidents using a content-s...
What do you like most about Teramind?
The product provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Teramind?
The license is based on the systems we use. We can also get a license based on the user base. It is an advantage.
What needs improvement with Teramind?
The solution must improve the UI. Searching for things on the UI is difficult. The user experience should be improved. I can understand it as a technical person, but our customers’ administrators h...
 

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
Government, Healthcare, Finance, Retails, Energy, Utilities and more. Example: Orange, Holiday Inn, Azteca
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.