Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Comindware Tracker vs OpenText Operations Orchestration comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.4
Comindware Tracker simplified workflow creation, enhanced efficiency, reduced risks, and saved costs with its user-friendly and transparent system.
Sentiment score
8.6
OpenText Operations Orchestration saves costs and time, reducing workloads and increasing productivity with a 40% efficiency improvement.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Comindware Tracker is praised for excellent, professional customer service, with quick issue resolution and minor scope for improvement.
Sentiment score
6.1
OpenText Operations Orchestration's customer and technical support can be inconsistent, with users experiencing varying levels of service quality.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.1
Comindware Tracker is praised for its scalability, flexibility, and seamless handling of organizational growth, ideal for large teams.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText Operations Orchestration is praised for scalability, handling large architectures seamlessly, and supporting diverse, extensive server networks without downtime.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Comindware Tracker is exceptionally stable, with high uptime, quick issue resolution, and praised for enterprise-wide applications.
Sentiment score
7.0
OpenText Operations Orchestration's stability has improved, achieving over 90% success despite minor customization and event remediation challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

Comindware Tracker needs frequent updates, easier integration, improved design, better documentation, enhanced analytics, and a mobile app option.
OpenText Operations Orchestration needs better integration, scalability, a modern interface, cloud options, open-source support, and pre-built workflows.
 

Setup Cost

Comindware Tracker offers cost-effective, user-friendly licensing with comprehensive features, but requires improved documentation for easier setup.
OpenText Operations Orchestration is seen as costly but offers significant value through cost and time-saving automation capabilities.
 

Valuable Features

Comindware Tracker offers user-friendly, low-code deployment with mobile access, enhancing workflow efficiency and collaboration at a budget-friendly cost.
OpenText Operations Orchestration streamlines automation with easy integration, centralized management, and flexible features, reducing deployment time significantly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Comindware Tracker
Ranking in Process Automation
41st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (51st)
OpenText Operations Orchest...
Ranking in Process Automation
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Operations Orchestration is 0.6%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop
Comindware is great for workflow management. It's user-friendly and trustworthy. You don't need technical skills to develop, maintain and update workflows. Using the intuitive web-based user interface of the visual workflow builder, you can design and set up workflows. Comindware Tracker is a good…
Ahmed Salman - PeerSpot reviewer
Increases productivity with automation and robust orchestration capabilities
The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available. There are ready-made workflows, integration with other products, a nice user interface, and reporting. The tool is flexible, agent-based or agentless. It allows significant automation and has robust orchestration and reporting capabilities. It is easy to configure and use, leading to increased efficiency across our IT processes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?
The pricing is medium, and the automation helps in cost and time savings, resulting in substantial value for money.
What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?
I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios. This would save time by not starting from scratch each time.
What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?
This tool serves as a central management hub, allowing seamless control of various IT processes via one console. I rate this solution eight out of ten.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.
Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. OpenText Operations Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.