Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ConnectWise SIEM vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

ConnectWise and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. ConnectWise is ranked #32 with an average rating of 10.0, while Trellix is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.5. ConnectWise holds a 0.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
ConnectWise SIEM
Read 2 ConnectWise SIEM reviews
  • 275 Views
  • 215 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews
  • 1,723 Views
  • 1,064 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response and ConnectWise SIEM are both highly regarded tools in the cybersecurity marketplace. Trellix EDR stands out for its ease of use and robust support, whereas ConnectWise SIEM takes an upper hand with its comprehensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: Trellix EDR is valued for its threat detection, automated response capabilities, and the efficiency it brings to security teams. ConnectWise SIEM has extensive integrations, real-time monitoring features, and scalability. Users note its customizability, adding to its feature completeness over Trellix EDR.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR can improve in reporting and alert accuracy, with some seeking more detailed analytics. ConnectWise SIEM users prefer a more intuitive configuration process, enhanced customer support experience, and fewer setup issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. ConnectWise SIEM offers a more complex deployment, but the robust support system offsets initial setup issues. Trellix's easier use and faster implementation time are strong points against ConnectWise's intricate setup.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR offers competitive pricing with good ROI due to its effective protection mechanisms. ConnectWise SIEM is more expensive initially but is considered worth the investment for its long-term benefits and comprehensive features. Users favoring ROI tend to prefer ConnectWise SIEM despite the higher cost.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ConnectWise SIEM
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
32nd
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (29th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (20th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (21st)
Trellix Endpoint Detection ...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of ConnectWise SIEM is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Giulio Valeri - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently monitoring and detecting suspicious activities
One valuable feature of ConnectWise Fortify is the ability to add other teams and receive notifications when customers make changes or remove multi-factor authentication in Microsoft or SAP environments. For instance, once we were connecting different parts in China, and we had to reserve resources for the blue source of the login of task no v. ConnectWise Fortify successfully mitigated the issue and monitored any suspicious activity in the Microsoft environment. Despite the inconvenience, the Microsoft environment is still active and susceptible to cyber threats. We do a lot of research and utilize ConnectWise Fortify to restart and restore the system. It's essential to have a solution like ConnectWise Fortify to protect against cyber threats.
Read full review
CESARCASTRO - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses
This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One valuable feature of ConnectWise Fortify is the ability to add other teams and receive notifications when customers make changes or remove multi-factor authentication in Microsoft or SAP environments."
"We have found the solution has great functionality and it is easy to use."
"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."
"When Trellix detects some threats, the device is isolated in a quarantine zone for examination."
"It is a scalable solution and very easy to use."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."
"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."
"The product provides a one-click recovery of encrypted files."
"The most valuable feature I found in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the guided analytics or guided EDR investigation."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the solution's technical support team a nine and a half or ten out of ten."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros
 

Cons

"ConnectWise Fortify could work on covering more areas, like phishing messages, which have become more complicated to detect."
"The manage portion of the solution is complicated and should be simplified by having different versions to meet the needs of different size companies."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Trellix does not support Linux and Mac."
"The solution's downside stems from the fact that Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and McAfee MVISION Endpoint are not combined into a single solution, so from an improvement perspective, they need to be combined into a single solution."
"I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements."
"Trellix needs to focus on gaining traction with partners and building trust among users."
"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."
"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."
"The console has a lot of bugs, and it creates many issues."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"The price is reasonable."
"The cost is okay, compared to other products."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."
"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Speaking about the price, you must use the product to find the product's cost for you."
"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."
"The pricing is always high."
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ConnectWise Fortify?
One valuable feature of ConnectWise Fortify is the ability to add other teams and receive notifications when customers make changes or remove multi-factor authentication in Microsoft or SAP environ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ConnectWise Fortify?
The pricing is good. I would say it's at a reasonable price point.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ConnectWise Fortify?
Currently, the virtual process is working fine, as it is able to detect Webex when intentional messages are sent. However, there is still room for improvement in this area. We could find a new way ...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
Trellix has a user-friendly interface.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?
This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowa...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Huntress Managed EDR vs ConnectWise SIEM Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs ConnectWise SIEM
Compared 41% of the time
Wazuh vs ConnectWise SIEM Logo
Wazuh vs ConnectWise SIEM
Compared 34% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs ConnectWise SIEM Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs ConnectWise SIEM
Compared 25% of the time
More ConnectWise SIEM Competitors
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 52% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 6% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Trend Vision One vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 5% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Compared 5% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
April 2025
ConnectWise SIEM reportDownload ConnectWise SIEM product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
March 2025
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report
 

Also Known As

ConnectWise Security Management, ConnectWise Fortify, Continuum Fortify, ConnectWise SIEM, ConnectWise SASE
McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response
 

Overview

IT solution providers are the first—and often only—line of defense for every kind of business in every part of the world. Whether managing mom-and-pop businesses or high-profile clients, providing preventive security measures is a must-have in today’s cybersecurity landscape. Security information and event management (SIEM) solutions offer an additional layer of security for your clients; however, most SIEM solutions are routinely difficult to manage, expensive to deploy, and require a significant amount of in-house cybersecurity expertise.

ConnectWise SIEM offers a powerful alternative to expand your security perspective to both prevention and detection. The solution includes comprehensive, flexible SIEM software that streamlines safety and security across your network without additional full-time employee costs or complicated implementations.

ConnectWise

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Techvera, Syrex, Clark Integrated Technologies
Sutherland Global Services
Buyer's Guide
ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
March 2025
Free Report: ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Find out what your peers are saying about ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ConnectWise SIEM vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.