Coralogix vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

Coralogix and Kong are both solutions in the API Management category. Coralogix is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kong is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.6. Coralogix holds a 0.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to Kong’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Kong users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

100 Views
68 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 24 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

8,512 Views
6,571 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Coralogix and Kong Gateway Enterprise are key players in the tech industry, each excelling in different areas while competing in pricing, support, and features. Data shows that Coralogix has an edge in pricing and support, whereas Kong Gateway Enterprise provides a compelling feature set worthy of investment.

Features:Coralogix specializes in real-time data analysis, scalability, and seamless integration with DevOps tools. It provides advanced analytics and convenient filtering options. The alerting system, which includes detailed metric analysis and correlation between logs, metrics, and traces, is also a strong point. Kong Gateway Enterprise offers robust API management, traffic control, and security features. It supports plugin-based security and boasts excellent rate limiting. The ability to integrate APIs with enterprise directories and customizable setups using Lua scripts adds to its flexibility.

Room for Improvement:Coralogix can enhance its API management capabilities and improve detailed documentation for non-tech users. Expanding its traffic control and security options could increase its appeal. Optimizing the user interface for broader usability beyond tech users might be beneficial. Kong Gateway Enterprise could simplify its setup process and provide better out-of-the-box configurations for easier deployment. While documentation is detailed, less technical explanations for complex integrations would support wider user adoption. Reducing the complexity of custom plugin development could also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Coralogix offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient data handling capabilities and reliable support, making it user-friendly for tech and non-tech users. Kong Gateway Enterprise requires a more involved setup but provides detailed documentation and extensive customization options. It offers flexibility in deployment environments and supports a wide range of use cases, praised for its scalable infrastructure solutions.

Pricing and ROI:Coralogix is known for its competitive pricing, offering substantial ROI with its scalable services, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Kong Gateway Enterprise, with a higher initial setup cost, provides significant ROI due to its comprehensive feature set and advanced API management capabilities. Its investment is seen as justified given the robust security, scalability, and performance enhancements available with the platform.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in API Management

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (33rd), Log Management (39th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 6.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

AmitKanodia

Cloud & Integration CoE Head at Capgemini

Provides role-based access control and can be easily customized with Lua script

Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

More Coralogix pros

"Kong's most valuable features are its lightweight performance when handling millions of requests and the ability to write custom plugins to enhance security, such as end-to-end encryption, even in the open-source version."

"There are a few features that I like about Kong when it comes to authentication and authorization. Specifically, being able to use Kong for role-based access control (RBAC), and then further being able to integrate the RBAC mechanism with our enterprise directory, was very useful."

"The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other companies and must ensure they adhere to their allocated usage limits. Without rate limiting, there's a risk of excessive usage, which could result in significant costs."

"Kong Gateway helped to improve performance. It's good enough for our users."

"The solution provides good performance."

"In our buying companies' perspective, it was easier to use compared to other platforms. The markets were pretty familiar with the solutions."

"Kong Enterprise has excellent plugin support."

"The most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise is its capability to integrate with various security tools."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

More Coralogix cons

"Kong Enterprise has decided not to support the web portal feature anymore, but I think that feature should stay in the on-premises solution."

"The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful."

"It becomes difficult if you try to scale it up to multiple clusters."

"The ease of billing is lost when Kong is not available directly on the Azure marketplace. This is one area where they can improve."

"We would like to see an automatic data API when we have a table in the database."

"Kong Enterprise can improve the customization to be able to do the integration properly."

"Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well."

"The developer portal needs to be improved."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."

"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."

"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."

"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."

"The licensing fees are paid yearly."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?

The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful. We use an open-source tool called Konga for basic dashboard needs, but it lacks support. It would be bette...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 30% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

April 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

April 2025

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

Kong

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

March 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.