Coralogix vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Coralogix and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Coralogix holds a 0.9% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,527 Views
1,157 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 25 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,554 Views
754 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Coralogix

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Coralogix are well-regarded monitoring solutions. Coralogix holds an edge in overall satisfaction due to advanced features, whereas OpenText SiteScope excels in pricing and support.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, ease of integration with other systems, and robust pricing options. Coralogix provides real-time analytics, sophisticated alerting mechanisms, and advanced data analytics capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope needs better performance, a more modern design, and enhanced support documentation. Coralogix requires better documentation, improved customer support, and more robust integration solutions.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. Coralogix offers seamless deployment and a user-friendly approach but lags behind in customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope is favored for competitive pricing and substantial ROI. Coralogix, though more costly, offers powerful features deemed worth the price. OpenText SiteScope stands out for its affordability, while Coralogix justifies its cost through advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (39th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (42nd), API Management (29th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence

The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient. By using templates for systems or databases, I can monitor various needs easily, which saves time and increases productivity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."

"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."

"Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good."

"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."

"It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."

"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."

"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."

"The tool has capabilities other than managing web-based applications, like URL Monitor and EPI Script. It is also easy to use the tool."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

More Coralogix cons

"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities."

"Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"Licensing is a little steep."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

34%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues. Overcoming control restrictions for different applications could be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 29% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

Prometheus Group vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 12% of the time

OmniPeek vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

April 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

March 2025

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.