Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Coverity vs Jscrambler comparison

The compared Black Duck and Jscrambler solutions aren't in the same category. Black Duck is ranked #4 in SAST , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 8.4% mindshare in the category. Jscrambler is ranked #45 in AS , and holds a 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Black Duck users are willing to recommend the solution.
Coverity
Read 41 Coverity reviews
  • 14,372 Views
  • 9,729 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Jscrambler
  • 256 Views
  • 114 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Coverity and Jscrambler based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,660 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Coverity is praised for scalability, although some face cost issues; it efficiently serves both small and large organizations.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Coverity enhances code quality with low false positives, security analysis, customizable options, and seamless integration into development workflows.
No sentiment score available
The most valuable feature of Coverity is its interprocedural analysis.
For more quotes and insights, download the Coverity report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Jscrambler report
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.7
Coverity users seek improved UI, better IDE integrations, reduced false positives, expanded language support, and enhanced reporting features.
No sentiment score available
The Coverity license fee is very high, making it tricky for individual developers.
For more quotes and insights, download the Coverity report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Jscrambler report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Coverity is praised for its stability and reliability, with users rating its performance highly and noting minimal configurations needed.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Coverity's customer service is generally responsive and professional, but some users encounter communication delays and inconsistent expertise.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
3.0
Coverity's pricing is perceived as expensive and complex, despite providing multi-language access without code limitations.
No sentiment score available
Coverity is considered expensive compared to other tools like SonarQube, which is much cheaper.
For more quotes and insights, download the Coverity report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Jscrambler report
 

Categories and Ranking

Coverity
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th)
Jscrambler
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (45th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Coverity and Jscrambler aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Coverity is designed for Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and holds a mindshare of 8.4%, up 7.2% compared to last year.
Jscrambler, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.1% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability
The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.
Read full review
Use Jscrambler?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
32%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
4%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
What do you like most about Coverity?
The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?
Coverity is considered expensive compared to other tools like SonarQube, which is much cheaper.
See all answers
Cequence Security vs Jscrambler: What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?
From a Cequence perspective: There are several reasons to consider Cequence. First, we're an API security solution. We protect APIs that act as the glue that makes your applications work. Since API...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity
Compared 54% of the time
Klocwork vs Coverity Logo
Klocwork vs Coverity
Compared 7% of the time
Fortify on Demand vs Coverity Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Coverity
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmarx One vs Coverity Logo
Checkmarx One vs Coverity
Compared 6% of the time
Veracode vs Coverity Logo
Veracode vs Coverity
Compared 5% of the time
More Coverity Competitors
Mend.io vs Jscrambler Logo
Mend.io vs Jscrambler
Compared 100% of the time
More Jscrambler Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Coverity
November 2024
Coverity reportDownload Coverity product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Jscrambler reportDownload Jscrambler product report
 

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis
No data available
 

Learn More

Black Duck
Jscrambler
 

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts. 

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

JSCRAMBLER ENABLES THE DETECTION AND MITIGATION OF COMPROMISED WEB SESSIONS IN REAL-TIME BY...

1. Instantly detecting any malicious code injection in the client-side of your application, whether it comes from a compromised user device/browser or rogue third-party code (supply chain attacks like Magecart);
2. Getting detailed information about the malicious code and attack delivery system (malicious browser extension, hacked form, etc.);
3. Reacting in real-time with custom countermeasures such as blocking the malicious script, raising the user session's risk or notifying the fraud department.
Webpage Integrity is trusted by enterprise customers in several sectors, including Banking, Financial Services, E-Commerce, and Government.

 

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space
Neobanks, Arkose Labs
Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.