Coverity vs Kiuwan comparison

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,402 Views
1,079 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Coverity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and Coverity are notable tools in the code analysis category. Coverity has an upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior functionality.

Features: Kiuwan provides a cloud-based architecture, facilitating integration and workflow streamlining. It offers responsive support and competitive pricing. Coverity is praised for its static analysis, detailed reporting, and a robust feature set, enhancing its value proposition.

Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could improve detailed reporting, expand customization options, and enhance user interface usability. Coverity might focus on developing better documentation, increasing update speed, and improving accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is easy to deploy, supported by excellent customer service, aiding swift issue resolution. Coverity has a more complex installation process but also offers strong customer support. There is potential for Coverity to refine its deployment model for a smoother experience.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is seen as cost-effective, providing high ROI through lower setup costs and efficient operations. Coverity, with a higher initial cost, justifies its pricing with advanced features and long-term benefits, offering a favorable ROI based on its capability set.

To learn more, read our detailed Coverity vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: March 2025).

Coverity vs. Kiuwan

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coverity

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kiuwan

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Coverity is 7.9%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Md. Shahriar Hussain

Information Security Analyst at Banglalink

Offers impressive reporting features with user-friendliness and high scalability

The solution can be easily setup but requires heavy integration due to the multiple types of port and programming languages involved. Comparing the resource requirements of the solution I would say it can be installed effortlessly. I would rate the initial setup an eight out of ten. A professional needs some pre-acquired knowledge to manage Coverity's deployment process, but the local solution partners provide support well enough for trouble-free deployment. The overall deployment process of Coverity took around two and a half hours in our organization. The deployment duration depends upon the operating system and resources including high-end RAM and CPU processors.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It help us identify the latest security vulnerabilities."

"The app analysis is the most valuable feature as I know other solutions don't have that."

"It has the lowest false positives."

"The product is easy to use."

"The solution effectively identifies bugs in code."

"This solution is easy to use."

"Coverity is scalable."

"I like Coverity's capability to scan codes once we push it. We don't need more time to review our colleagues' codes. Its UI is pretty straightforward."

More Coverity pros

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The solution needs to improve its false positives."

"Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations."

"They could improve the usability. For example, how you set things up, even though it's straightforward, it could be still be easier."

"I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse."

"Coverity is not a user-friendly product."

"The setup takes very long."

"We use GitHub and Gitflow, and Coverity does not fit with Gitflow. I have to create a screen for our branches, and it's a pain for developers. It has been difficult to integrate Coverity with our system."

"Ideally, it would have a user-based license that does not have a restriction in the number of lines of code."

More Coverity cons

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."

"Offers varying prices for different companies"

"The tool's price is somewhere in the middle. It's neither cheap nor expensive. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is low, and ten is high price."

"I rate Coverity's price a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

"This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."

"Coverity’s price is on the higher side. It should be lower."

More Coverity pricing and cost advice

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Check with your account manager."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

What do you like most about Coverity?

The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coverity?

I do not know about the pricing.

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Coverity

Comparisons

Compared 51% of the time

Klocwork vs Coverity

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Coverity

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Coverity

Compared 5% of the time

More Coverity Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 53% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

GitLab vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Coverity

Download Coverity product report

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

Synopsys Static Analysis

No data available

Overview

Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts.

Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports more than 20 languages and 200 frameworks and templates.

Black Duck

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Sample Customers

SAP, Mega International, Thales Alenia Space

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Coverity vs. Kiuwan