Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cybersixgill vs Intel 471 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cybersixgill
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
22nd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (63rd), Digital Risk Protection (5th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (21st)
Intel 471
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Cybersixgill is 4.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Intel 471 is 5.3%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1528356 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 10, 2021
Provides early detection of imminent attacks, and speeds up addressing of vulnerabilities internally because it makes them real
They're a newer company, so they're working on their UI a lot. Sometimes the UI is a little glitchy. They're working on different things and making efforts, so that's totally forgivable. But regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries. Step-by-step videos would be useful, instead of a book of instructions, because they're a new tool. They're now getting to the point where video training would be useful, or even live training. More digestible video instructions or opportunities for training, so that you actually learn hands-on, would help.
Use Intel 471?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors."
"The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good."
"The pricing and licensing are good. It is expensive for us because the US dollar is quite strong compared to our dollar. Otherwise, it is quite reasonable for what it is. All the tools in the market are around the same price from my experience."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Current customers include large enterprises, financial services, manufacturing, GSIs, MSSPs, government and law enforcement entities.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, CrowdStrike, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.