Datamatics TruBot vs Microsoft Power Automate comparison

"Ability to calculate the ROI on the jobs that are running."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward and easy to use."

"The solution is inexpensive compared to many other solutions in the market."

"The feature most useful for integrating different applications is its ability to create flows. Specifically, we use flows to integrate with finance and operations."

"The initial setup was easy. It was very easy for people to pick up. The deployment took a few hours."

"In just in one click, we can see any documentation, etc., that we need. It makes it very easy to navigate."

"Microsoft Power Automate is very easy to use."

"From my personal experience of using Microsoft Power Automate, I think that the automatic document processing feature is helpful for many organizations in streamlining administrative processes. It is a very good feature. It has helped many enterprises to process documents without spending much time on them."

"AI Builder is a good add-on."

"The initial setup isn't too difficult."

"The connectors are a very good feature."

"Would like to see more additions to the library."

"There is a learning curve, and some training could be included to bring users up to speed."

"The stability of the product has certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"When comparing with Automation Anywhere, there are a couple of things that this product doesn't have. One of the major things is the key management system. It would be great if they improve this. Its documentation can also be improved."

"It would be good to have some kind of on-premises solution for BPMN users, but I don't think Microsoft will ever go back to the on-premises solution. They all train their clients to use their online services. It is easy, but it doesn't follow the industry-wide standards. I can only use the processes that Microsoft gives us. I can't map a business process by using other standards or notations, such as Business Process Management (BPM). I have to use whatever Microsoft gives us. I would like to have support for some standards because if we decide to use another BPM tomorrow, we will have to remap everything in notation to transfer from this solution. This is the only block or obstacle that I see in using this solution. It is closed in its infrastructure."

"The tool should improve its price."

"The connectors and the integration capability can be improved. Microsoft RPA is a growing platform, and it is not yet particularly mature."

"WinAutomation is scalable to a certain extent. I would rate it seven for the scalability, which could be better. Softomotive is better scalable than WinAutomation in this regard."

"Microsoft Power Automate requires some knowledge and understanding of nuances for setup and security approvals."

"Some automation features on some programs did not work smoothly."

"When compared to other workflow automation tools out there, it's just not as mature."

"The tool is expensive."

"The pricing of this solution is very good and for me, it's the best option there is."

"The license cost could be better."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"There is zero licensing cost. It comes with our Microsoft Office subscription."

"I give the cost a three out of ten."

"The licensing price should be more cost-effective."

"Its license is a part of our enterprise agreement. It is a three-year contract, but we pay yearly. So, it is a yearly license. There are no additional costs."

"This solution can save money when used for simple tasks specifically using only Microsoft products."