Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Datamatics TruCap+ vs UiPath Document Understanding comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Datamatics TruCap+
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Document Understanding
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Datamatics TruCap+ is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Document Understanding is 14.3%, up from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

IS
Comes with API services and data analytics features but needs to improve stability
We use the product for API and interface collections.  The tool's most valuable features are API services and data analytics.  Datamatics TruCap+ needs to improve its stability.  I have been working with the product for a month.  I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten.  The product is…
ManinderSodhi - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution can process a large volume of invoices with a high success rate and little human validation
We are working with 40,000 different vendor templates. Document Understanding can understand and process various formats without much manual effort to configure the templates. That wasn't the case when we were using Microsoft. UiPath can read handwritten signatures with a success rate of around 70 percent. We've even processed pay slips in German. The language translations are around 90 percent accurate. The AI/ML component offers great flexibility in creating custom models. Its built-in models are also highly mature. The integration is seamless. We have RPA talking between our ERP systems and sharing information on the UiPath cloud.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's most valuable features are API services and data analytics."
"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding."
"I believe the most valuable feature is the prebuilt algorithm for extracting information from foreign invoices."
"The solution removes manual processes and reduces human dependency. It takes a lot of effort to go through each physical mail or email, extract the data and transfer it to Excel. However, the solution automates the process and works 24/7. The tool gives a complete package to process and understand documents. The valuable features include taxonomy modification, classification, workstation, etc. There are out-of-the-box features like ML models which you can custom build. We have saved time with UiPath Document Understanding. We have seen a 50 percent improvement in scanning processes. Compared to humans, the tool runs 24/7. The human error rate has also been reduced. Our human error rate is five percent now compared to the previous 15 percent. UiPath Document Understanding has also freed up our staff who now spend more time on critical tasks."
"The most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding is the AI Center."
"Document classification is very good."
"Has a very good machine learning feature."
"UiPath Document Understanding offers valuable features like Arabic language support, which is crucial for effective communication and automation in the Arabic-speaking world."
"The prebuilt algorithm for extracting foreign invoices is the most valuable feature because it eliminates the need for us to build anything from scratch."
 

Cons

"Datamatics TruCap+ needs to improve its stability."
"Right now, we are trying to use Instabase, which is another tool for document understanding."
"Document Understanding would be improved with more AI platforms."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Document Understanding is data extraction from scanned documents. It could be better because I've observed a ten percent failure or flaw whenever the vendor scans and converts documents into PDFs."
"I would like to see more integration of artificial intelligence. That's being implemented, but it would be a massive improvement to the solution's document processing. If UiPath achieves intelligent document processing, it will be far better than anything on the market. There are currently some limitations with the fields that could be addressed using a GPT engine. With an integrated AI model, you wouldn't need to create your taxonomy. You would only need to provide some prompts, such as "What is the property name?" It will store that as a variable."
"The signature comparison feature of UiPath Document Understanding could be improved."
"The documentation should be more clear, or better training should be provided."
"UiPath Document Understanding's ability to handle diverse document formats, including scans and signatures, needs improvement."
"There is also room for improvement in long-running table extraction. If a table continues for more than 10 pages, in some cases, we have observed that it only extracts six or seven pages and skips the last pages."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I rate UiPath Document Understanding an eight on cost."
"UiPath Document Understanding is priced high compared to its competition."
"The last time we implemented UiPath Document Understanding the price was high."
"UiPath has a higher upfront cost, but its Document Understanding feature is not a significant additional expense compared to the overall platform."
"I have only been using its free version."
"It's expensive, but you can reduce the price per license by getting more licenses. Overall, the pricing is okay."
"We received a 60-day free trial before having to purchase a license to continue using UiPath Document Understanding."
"The pricing is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Datamatics TruCap+?
The tool's most valuable features are API services and data analytics.
What needs improvement with Datamatics TruCap+?
Datamatics TruCap+ needs to improve its stability.
What is your primary use case for Datamatics TruCap+?
We use the product for API and interface collections.
What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?
The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?
I am not aware of the pricing details. My manager handles that, and as far as I know, Instabase is more expensive.
What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?
Right now, we are trying to use Instabase, which is another tool for document understanding. It may be one one step ahead. It is faster than UiPath.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ARI Global Fleet Management, Ashapura Minechem Ltd, Blue Star, BUPA, Memphis Area Transit Authority (MATA)
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). Updated: March 2025.
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.