Amazon Textract vs UiPath IXP comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and UiPath are both solutions in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while UiPath is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in IDP, compared to UiPath’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Amazon Textract

Read 4 Amazon Textract reviews

712 Views
662 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

UiPath IXP

Read 57 UiPath IXP reviews

2,822 Views
2,822 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon Textract

UiPath IXP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Amazon Textract and UiPath IXP compete in the document processing solutions category. UiPath IXP holds the upper hand with its comprehensive automation features, appealing to buyers seeking extensive capabilities, whereas Amazon Textract is favored for its cost-effectiveness and quality customer support, attracting budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Amazon Textract is effective in extracting structured data from diverse document formats and provides accurate information with coordinated data points. It's known for its simplified API use, reducing manpower needs. UiPath IXP offers extensive machine learning capabilities, allowing integration with third-party applications, machine learning extractors for processing unstructured data, and automated document classifications.

Room for Improvement: Amazon Textract can improve on its accuracy in complex document layouts, enhance OCR quality for handwritten documents, and expand integration with additional tools. UiPath IXP could benefit from reduced setup requirements, improved documentation clarity, and enhanced effectiveness in processing handwritten data.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Textract offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment, praised for its user-friendly setup and efficient scalability. Its customer service provides timely, reliable support. UiPath IXP, available on-premises and in the cloud, offers flexible deployment but might require more resources for setup. Its robust support is less cost-effective relative to Textract.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon Textract has a lower initial setup cost and quick ROI for basic needs. It is designed for cost efficiency. UiPath IXP, with higher upfront costs, provides value through its extensive feature set, showing significant long-term ROI in comprehensive automation tasks. Textract is appealing for cost-efficiency whereas UiPath IXP is ideal for those focusing on scalability and feature richness.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Textract vs. UiPath IXP Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Textract vs. UiPath IXP

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Textract

Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath IXP

Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Amazon Textract is 2.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath IXP is 6.6%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath IXP	6.6%
Amazon Textract	2.3%
Other	91.1%

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

Featured Reviews

SomdipRoy

Solution Architect at Skillnetinc

Have faced limitations due to integration complexity but have processed documents efficiently and reduced manual effort

Bedrock is basically a framework that can manage multiple large language models. Another useful tool is Amazon Textract which extracts text from documents. It helps with compliance because Amazon Textract itself doesn't store anything. When hundreds of documents are uploaded in an S3 bucket, the S3 bucket will store the documents, but Amazon Textract itself doesn't store anything. It pulls the contents of the documents and then passes them on to the next system, making it compliant. It helps in a great way by reducing the load on LLM and reducing the cost.

Read full review

Gangadhar Wali

Founder and COO at InVibes

Pre-trained models work well, but it is very expensive

We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is missing, it gives a completely incorrect number. These discrepancies should be fixed because if the OCR itself doesn't work properly, then AI doesn't help with that. When AI is used for training models, the AI Center works precisely, but if the data itself is wrong, we can't do anything. If the extraction of data is proper, it definitely helps. However, 20% errors could be reduced if the OCR engine were better. In future updates, I would like to see better handling of issues such as when a dot is missing in currency, for example, with dollars, it should handle that automatically. It's very expensive. If the volume increases, we can't afford to use Document Understanding. We are thinking of moving to another solution because we are expecting 80,000 to 100,000 invoices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Textract is superior because it has features that allow you to use analytics or intelligent automation with the OCR; it will automatically identify key and value pairs, so you can use the data easily."

"Amazon Textract was easy to use."

"With the help of Amazon Textract, we are reducing labor and manpower because with just one API call, we can get all the extracted information with its coordinates."

"In a project, I integrated Amazon Textract with Bedrock and passed the extracted document text to the LLM using Bedrock."

"The support is actually very good; I've worked with Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, but compared to the others, AWS support is excellent."

"UiPath Document Understanding is user-friendly, with an easy-to-use self-trained model, and the OCR it provides does a good job even with scanned PDFs."

"Invoice processing is the most valuable feature. Most of my customers use Document Understanding for invoice processing. That's one of the most common use cases. Typically, each customer starts their RPA journey with the finance department because that's the area where you can see the most benefit."

"We are working with 40,000 different vendor templates. Document Understanding can understand and process various formats without much manual effort to configure the templates. That wasn't the case when we were using Microsoft."

"UiPath Document Understanding cuts down a lot of order processing time and agents' time, saving both human effort, which in turn translates to better cost efficiency."

"Document Understanding has better machine learning or ML capabilities, and that is why I prefer Document Understanding."

"The entity-level extraction is very good. The workflow is also very good."

"The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined."

"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of UiPath Document Understanding."

More UiPath IXP pros

Cons

"Some easy integration with other systems could be improved."

"They should provide an offline solution because in many areas in India and outside, there are clients facing Internet issues."

"The product has not given correct results for me. It was not accurate, especially with handwritten items and documents with pencil marks, which Amazon Textract failed to identify correctly."

"They should provide an offline solution because in many areas in India and outside, there are clients facing Internet issues."

"Some easy integration with other systems could be improved."

"Sometimes the tabular data does not process properly for complex tabular structures or complex tables."

"The results of classifying patient documents within UiPath Document Understanding need to be more accurate."

"The coding machine learning could be a little bit better."

"Sometimes we have challenges when we need to read something like a barcode, so we must use the Cisco algorithm to solve the issue, or I have to ask developers for help specifically to capture this kind of information. There are other processes, such as refunds, that we still must do manually because there is no way to use automation to solve this issue."

"Extending the trial period for UiPath Document Understanding from three to six months would allow organizations to evaluate their capabilities thoroughly."

"One area of improvement for UiPath Document Understanding is the accuracy of handwritten documents. While the solution supports handwritten documents, the accuracy percentage is not as high as desired."

"If the volume increases, we can't afford to use Document Understanding. We are thinking of moving to another solution because we are expecting 80,000 to 100,000 invoices."

"I would like more flexibility in Document Understanding's validation center."

"There could be a feature similar to ChatGPT where when you ask about a document, you get an answer about what is there in that document. If possible, this kind of feature can be incorporated so that you do not need to open a file and take the value. It should directly detect that instead of opening and validating the document. Such a feature will speed up the process."

More UiPath IXP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"UiPath is a pricey tool for small customers."

"UiPath Document Understanding compared to the competitors is high."

"Our clients are concerned about the volume-based pricing model, as UiPath charges more than other vendors in the market."

"UiPath Document Understanding is priced high compared to its competition."

"UiPath Document Understanding carries a premium price tag, but its current technological capabilities may not yet fully justify the cost."

"For the licensing part, in our company, we initially started off with a monthly plan, but yearly plans are also there. Cost-wise, UiPath Document Understanding is good since it provides flexibility in its pricing."

"One of the biggest challenges we face with UiPath is the pricing structure."

"I have only been using its free version."

More UiPath IXP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Textract?

Organizations typically build the CI/CD pipeline. The main application could be hosted anywhere - it could be hosted on a machine, EC2, or it could be containerized. Some organizations do manual de...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Textract?

Some easy integration with other systems could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Textract?

In an organization with an opening for a developer position, the organization receives hundreds of resumes. Instead of manually evaluating those resumes, Amazon Textract can be used to pull the con...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?

The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?

Both UiPath and Blue Prism are expensive. Customers are trying to move to some other Agentic space because of high pricing, so the new initiatives are put on hold, and they're looking for alternati...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?

The challenge is more on handwriting and language-specific document extraction. There is some room for improvement when it comes to understanding handwriting. Document Understanding at the current ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Capture vs Amazon Textract

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Datacap vs Amazon Textract

Compared 16% of the time

Resistant AI Document vs Amazon Textract

Compared 15% of the time

Instabase vs Amazon Textract

Compared 9% of the time

ABBYY Vantage vs Amazon Textract

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon Textract Competitors

Tungsten TotalAgility vs UiPath IXP

Compared 16% of the time

ABBYY Vantage vs UiPath IXP

Compared 13% of the time

Instabase vs UiPath IXP

Compared 11% of the time

Hypatos vs UiPath IXP

Compared 5% of the time

Rossum vs UiPath IXP

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath IXP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Textract

February 2026

Download Amazon Textract product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath IXP

January 2026

Download UiPath IXP product report

Overview

Amazon Textract is a service that automatically extracts text and data from scanned documents. Amazon Textract goes beyond simple optical character recognition (OCR) to also identify the contents of fields in forms and information stored in tables.

Many companies today extract data from documents and forms through manual data entry that’s slow and expensive or through simple optical character recognition (OCR) software that requires manual customization or configuration. Rules and workflows for each document and form often need to be hard-coded and updated with each change to the form or when dealing with multiple forms. If the form deviates from the rules, the output is often scrambled and unusable.

Amazon Textract overcomes these challenges by using machine learning to instantly “read” virtually any type of document to accurately extract text and data without the need for any manual effort or custom code. With Textract you can quickly automate document workflows, enabling you to process millions of document pages in hours. Once the information is captured, you can take action on it within your business applications to initiate next steps for a loan application or medical claims processing. Additionally, you can create smart search indexes, build automated approval workflows, and better maintain compliance with document archival rules by flagging data that may require redaction.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

UiPath IXP leverages machine learning and OCR technology to streamline document processing. Its intelligent field recognition and prebuilt algorithms enhance accuracy, offering integration capabilities to meet demands across industries, while addressing pricing and handwriting recognition challenges.

UiPath IXP provides robust automation for document management with features like efficient document classification and the ability to process different formats, including handwritten and image-based inputs. The AI and Action Centers facilitate validation processes, making it adaptable for multiple use cases. Although handwriting recognition and integration with other systems need improvement, its pre-trained templates ensure swift deployment. Pricing concerns remain, particularly for smaller organizations, but IXP continues to be an advantageous solution in document automation when accuracy and efficiency are prioritized.

What are the key features of UiPath IXP?

Machine Learning: Automates and optimizes data processing.
Easy Integration: Seamlessly connects with other systems.
OCR Technology: Accurately captures text from images and scanned documents.
Intelligent Field Recognition: Identifies and processes diverse document elements.
Prebuilt Algorithms: Reduces manual interventions, enhancing precision.

What benefits or ROI should be expected from UiPath IXP?

Document Automation: Streamlines complex document workflows.
Accuracy: Minimizes errors with advanced recognition capabilities.
Efficiency: Lowers operational costs via reduced manual tasks.
Rapid Deployment: Pre-trained templates ensure quick setup.

In finance, UiPath IXP automates invoice handling and data extraction, crucial for reducing manual effort. Healthcare leverages it for managing patient records with high accuracy. Manufacturing benefits from processing order forms and compliance documents, handling substantial volumes efficiently and effectively.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Cambia, Change Healthcare, ClearDATA

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Textract vs. UiPath IXP

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon Textract vs. UiPath IXP

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Textract vs. UiPath IXP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Textract vs. UiPath IXP report.

See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.

We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.