Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete comparison

Deep Instinct and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Deep Instinct is ranked #40 with an average rating of 9.0, while SentinelOne is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Deep Instinct holds a 0.7% mindshare in EPP, compared to SentinelOne’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Deep Instinct users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Read 18 Deep Instinct Prevention Platform reviews

2,958 Views
1,799 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Singularity Com...

Read 191 SentinelOne Singularity Complete reviews

26,848 Views
13,827 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

SentinelOne Singularity Com...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Deep Instinct Prevention Platform are two leading cybersecurity solutions. While SentinelOne is better in support and pricing, Deep Instinct stands out for its advanced features, offering a significant edge in proactive threat prevention.

Features: SentinelOne provides comprehensive endpoint protection with automation and AI capabilities, making it highly efficient. Deep Instinct offers pre-execution threat prevention with its deep learning technology, offering unmatched proactive threat detection. While sharing advanced technological foundations, Deep Instinct's deep learning focus gives it an advantage.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne users seek enhancements in reporting and analytics, better analytical capabilities, and refined integration possibilities. Deep Instinct needs improved integration with other security tools, enhanced ecosystem compatibility, and more seamless interoperability with existing systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service, giving it an edge over Deep Instinct. Despite its easy deployment, Deep Instinct occasionally faces integration challenges, making SentinelOne a slightly better choice in this regard.

Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne is competitively priced, providing high ROI with noted cost-effectiveness and value. Deep Instinct, although more expensive, delivers substantial ROI due to its unique preventive capabilities. While SentinelOne is more budget-friendly, the significant ROI of Deep Instinct validates its higher cost for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Deep Instinct Prevention Pl...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

40th

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SentinelOne Singularity Com...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

2nd

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

191

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is 4.4%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Aaron Branson

Head of Marketing, Cybersecurity Solutions at Netsurion

Bolsters prevention with great detection and response capabilities

Due to the nature of deep learning, it’s sometimes difficult to determine why the AI model has blocked a specific file, although this has improved over time. The downside of its intelligence and automation is we could use more logging details of what happened behind the scenes. Enhancements for multi-tenant use cases will be a plus as we scale up usage. We're able to work around it within our own multi-tenant XDR platform, but the improved delineation of parties within an instance is beneficial. Continuous improvement to the admin UI naturally will help improve the experience and allow us to work faster. Sometimes it can be chalked up to training, however, great UX makes a big difference in saving time. Wider Linux flavors coverage also would be a plus.

Read full review

Prince Joseph

Group Chief Information Officer at NeST Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Reduces organizational risk, low on machine load, and helps prevent ransomware

The most important aspect of the solution is that the load on the machine is not very high. It doesn't take up battery resources. The solution prevents ransomware and other threats. So far, it is working brilliantly. The dashboards and UI are user friendly, as is the ability to configure as needed. It seems to have a lot more capabilities. The XDR capabilities, in particular, look very strong. We're currently looking into that. If we want to do integrations with third parties, we don't have very many challenges around that. The ability to ingest and correlate across our security solutions is very useful. It's impressive. The AI engine it has is excellent. It helps us consolidate our security solutions. While it does not allow us to reduce alerts per se, it does a good job of correlating. The way it's integrated into the SIM, it's working to the expectations we have. The solution helps free up people so that they can work on other tasks. We don't have to grow our team too much now. My security team is actually quite small - about five people. We all get more time to handle other tasks. We've noted that it does help reduce mean time to respond. We can identify events easier and those that are most critical are brought to the forefront. Previously, we were in the dark. Now we have so much more visibility. It's been a huge improvement. It's effectively helped to reduce organizational risk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Deep Instinct was a strategic complement to our Open XDR platform."

"When we were looking at Carbon Black and Sophos, the prevention pieces weren't as strong when compared to DI, which is why we decided to go with DI... I would rather have a product that does the prevention up front and saves me the effort of having to wipe someone's workstation."

"The most valuable features are the static/dynamic analyses. Deep Instinct's predictive model has very high accuracy and provides threat information for unknown malware, such as malware classification, static analysis information, and sandbox information."

"The CPU consumption is low compared to what I have been using in my current environment, which is Sophos. The footprint is a lot smaller, about a quarter of Sophos. It is very small."

"The product offers integration capabilities and is also easy to use."

"The detection rate is very high. In all the testing with around 20 partners in different environments, quite a lot of them had installed with other anti-malware applications, like Sophos. This software can co-exist with those applications in the same machine. This is impressive."

"I really like the behavioral analysis feature, because it looks at all the different things, like arbitrary shellcode and reflective DLL. It looks at a lot of things that threat actors use as threat vectors to get into the environment."

"The most important thing is that it is for prevention. It prevents attacks of any type of malware. Normally, what we've seen in other products is that they are not for prevention. They isolate a possible threat that they don't understand or know about, and then they check it with our database to see if it needs any correction or elimination. This means that the threat is already inside a customer's base, whereas Deep Instinct prevents a threat from getting in. Prevention is basically done by an agent in each installation, PCU, or product. An agent has its own intelligence to be able to detect if it should stop a threat or not. It has been taught. It is like a brain that has been taught to react according to any possible threat. Deep Instinct is very light. It doesn't take too much CPU attention or memory. It doesn't slow down the performance. You don't really realize any change in the performance, which makes it very different from other solutions. They are usually heavy for the users."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pros

"The most valuable aspect, in any scenario, was the rollback feature."

"It identifies what applications are vulnerable. If I go to the applications, such as Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Reader, I can see our current list of vulnerabilities: How many are vulnerable and how many need to be updated with patching. One of the most valuable aspects is the ease of finding specific vulnerabilities."

"Unlike other endpoint solutions like Kaspersky or Trend Micro, SentinelOne's agents are exceptionally lightweight, updating seamlessly without consuming significant network or system resources."

"The most valuable features are forensic investigation and ransomware prevention."

"I work in vulnerability management, and for me, at the moment, its automation is most valuable. For the SOC team, incident visibility would be most valuable, but for me, it is automation."

"The initial setup is very straightforward and easy."

"Singularity's rollback feature is one of the primary reasons we bought the product. If there's an attack on the machine, the system can automatically roll back the data and the hard drive of the machine that was attacked."

"It is a robust solution. It provides great visibility."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete pros

Cons

"I am looking forward to them adding Linux in Q1 or Q2 of 2019, as this is often requested by my partners and customers. Currently, Deep Instinct only has Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS."

"Its support for Linux and Unix operating systems can be improved. Currently, they cover macOS and Windows, but they don't cover Linux and some of the Unix products. Pricing is also an issue. Its pricing is not as aggressive as it could be, and its price makes it difficult to sell. Customers feel that they can get an antivirus for a lower price, even though it is not a similar product. It is technically different. Their SLAs can be better. They have to give you 24/7 support, but their SLAs are not very good. They should be better documented, and the offerings should also be a little bit better. What happens is that the SLAs end up in the hands of the intermediary, seller, or the local partner of Deep Instinct in a country. The customers want very fast SLAs in a very short time, but Deep Instinct doesn't give them at the same speed. Having said that, SLAs are important when you have a lot of issues, but this product doesn't have too many issues, so it is not a big concern. However, for a customer who doesn't know the product, it could be a concern."

"The interface on the endpoint could be a little more descriptive and more valuable. It doesn't always tell you the data you need to see. Improvement there would be very helpful."

"When things get done automatically, I would appreciate more logging of what's happening in the background... we should be able to backtrack from the log that gets uploaded to our cloud instance and see, forensically, what the root cause was."

"They have a manual, but it is not excessive."

"Some features are too resource intensive."

"I think it's probably the administration, especially the administration platform, which could be improved in the solution. It's clunky and hard to navigate, especially for inexperienced technicians."

"There's an issue in the installation process where you can't install it unless you disable the built-in Windows Bitdefender antivirus. So, you have to manually disable Microsoft Bitdefender in order to install Deep Instinct. So, that makes it impossible to do a network rollout unless you manually visit each computer, which is ridiculous."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform cons

"The solution can improve by adding more granular firewall capabilities."

"Email security should also integrate with it to get more visibility on it."

"The solution should include USB blocking for specific machines."

"They can just continue adding more integrations with these big brands and software security products."

"It primarily operates on local machines, monitoring processes, and not always providing detailed insights, relying on external information to determine the nature of a file."

"SentinelOne should include Ranger Pro out of the box with Singularity Complete."

"Ranger does provide me with visibility of the network, but not completely because the assets it scans are often mistakenly identified regarding what type of device they are."

"Although the SentinelOne firewall seems to offer potential benefits, in reality, it hasn't proven to be very helpful."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are a nonprofit. The MSP had provides pretty decent nonprofit rates for us. This was one of the key factors that made us choose Deep Instinct over its competitors who were significantly more expensive."

"Its pricing is too high, but that is not because of the product. It is expensive because of the cost of the console. You need a console to control the whole thing, but the console is expensive. You have to split this cost among all possible users. Normally, to be able to make it economically attractive, you need at least 1,000 agents, PCs, or users. If you have a customer with 300 to 500 agents, PCs, or users, it becomes too pricey."

"Their pricing is very competitive. It is good, fair, and a lot cheaper than what we were doing with Cylance."

"In comparison to the other products out there, it's exceptionally competitively priced. When you consider the lower administrative overhead that it facilitates, it's an absolute value."

"The pricing is a little bit expensive but we are satisfied with DI's performance."

"If I include the false positive rate and the detection rate in the comparison, Deep Instinct is worth its price."

"There are no additional costs on the price, and our company has a support contract, which bundles in those services anyway."

"One thing about their licensing program that I like is that just one covers the server as well as on the endpoint as well as mobile devices. There is no complexity in calculating how many SKUs I need for mobile, for laptop, for desktop, and for servers. It's very simple and that makes it much easier to budget."

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform pricing and cost advice

"You have to look at the kinds of problems you can end up with and the fact that you want security against them, and then SentinelOne is not expensive."

"The pricing of SentinelOne is less than McAfee."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete's pricing is affordable."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete is expensive, but we must be willing to pay for it if we want a high level of protection."

"The license is paid annually and is competitive."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete meets all enterprise requirements and is priced accordingly."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete's price point is excessive compared to the functionality it provides."

"SentinelOne makes licensing easy by reducing the number of modules or packages that they have to offer. A lot of other vendors make licensing very complicated with separate modules or separate costs. By bundling necessary features, SentinelOne ensures that security leaders are not left confused by options. This bundling of necessities has served our needs well."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Deep Instinct?

The product offers integration capabilities and is also easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deep Instinct?

There is a need for customers of the product to pay towards the licensing costs of the tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Deep Instinct?

The solution's stability is good. If the tool was able to provide fine-tuning capabilities from the product's end depending on the environment of its user, then it would be a good improvement in th...

See all answers

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...

See all answers

Which is better - SentinelOne or Darktrace?

Which solution is better depends on which is more suitable specifically for your company. Darktrace, for example, is meant for smaller to medium-sized businesses. It is also a good option for organ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SentinelOne?

The AI solution makes it easy for customers to detect and manage policies, as well as documents that help customers manage their platform.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 9% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Deep Instinct Prevention Platform Competitors

Darktrace vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 8% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 4% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform

December 2024

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform report

Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

November 2024

Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sentinel Labs, SentinelOne Singularity

Learn More

Deep Instinct

SentinelOne

Overview

Deep Instinct PREVENTS >99% of UNKNOWN threats like ransomware and zero-days before they land inside your environment – not after. With both an agentless and agent-based approach, we ensure file-based and fileless attacks are prevented. To achieve this, Deep Instinct is pioneering the use of deep learning AI to prevent threats in <20ms, without requiring calls to the cloud for threat intelligence. Our ability to scale to the needs of the enterprise is unprecedented as is our delivery of the industry’s lowest false positive rate of <0.1%.

The Deep Instinct Prevention Platform combines industry-leading static analysis based on the only deep learning framework dedicated to cybersecurity and includes two solutions:

Deep Instinct Prevention for Applications is a flexible, containerized and highly scalable solution, deployed via API or ICAP, to scan million so files per day and prevent malicious files from entering storage environments.

Deep Instinct for Endpoints complements EDR solutions by preventing threats pre-execution, minimizing false positives, improving the productivity of SOC teams, and increasing the efficiency of the security stack.

To learn more, visit: https://www.deepinstinct.com.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides AI-driven threat detection and response with features like ransomware protection and rollback, offering endpoint protection with minimal system impact and deep forensic analysis.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete combines machine learning and artificial intelligence to offer robust endpoint protection. It delivers real-time insights and advanced threat detection through seamless integration with third-party tools, allowing for efficient endpoint management. With an emphasis on user-friendliness, it ensures reduced false positives. Room for improvement includes better integration options, enhanced reporting, and more precise analytics to tackle false positives. Users seek improved interoperability with systems and comprehensive support for legacy systems.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete?

Rollback Feature: Enables restoration of affected systems to a healthy state after an attack.
Ransomware Protection: Advanced mechanisms to prevent and mitigate ransomware threats.
Machine Learning and AI: Utilizes cutting-edge technology for precise threat detection and response.
Seamless Integration: Works well with third-party tools for enhanced endpoint protection.
Real-Time Protection: Proactively defends against advanced threats with minimal delays.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced False Positives: Accurate threat detection limits operational disruptions.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Ensures security with low system impact.
User-Friendly Experience: Simplified management and ease of use aid productivity.
Deep Forensic Analysis: Assists in effective threat investigation and response.
Cost-Effective Security: Positions as a worthwhile alternative to traditional antivirus solutions.

Organizations from industries like finance, healthcare, and technology deploy SentinelOne Singularity Complete to safeguard endpoints such as PCs, servers, and virtual machines. Equipped with EDR, it effectively replaces traditional antivirus systems and integrates with cloud technology for real-time security insights.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Havas, Flex, Estee Lauder, McKesson, Norfolk Southern, JetBlue, Norwegian airlines, TGI Friday, AVX, Fim Bank

Buyer's Guide

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

November 2024

Free Report: Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Find out what your peers are saying about Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.