Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Devo vs Logpoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
Devo enhances root cause remediation by 50%, offering cost savings, scalability, fast cloud deployment, and diverse client flexibility.
Sentiment score
6.7
Logpoint ensures compliance, cost predictability, and security, offering 40% ROI and fulfilling Department of Defense contract needs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Devo's customer service is responsive and efficient, but improvements are needed in documentation and onboarding support.
Sentiment score
7.3
Logpoint's customer service is improving, but response times and communication barriers lead to varied user experiences worldwide.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Devo's cloud-based structure ensures seamless scalability, supporting diverse roles and extensive deployments for effective data handling and monitoring.
Sentiment score
7.2
LogPoint's modular design ensures effective scalability across enterprise environments, integrating seamlessly and handling growth efficiently with high user ratings.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Devo is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues and efficient management, evolving positively as a cloud-native service.
Sentiment score
6.4
Logpoint offers stable performance on adequate hardware but faces issues with limited resources, occasional bugs, and diverse log handling.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
 

Room For Improvement

Devo faces performance, customization, integration, and pricing challenges, needing improvements in AI, reporting, and dashboard capabilities.
Logpoint faces challenges in integration, user experience, and support, requiring improvements in detection, deployment, and interface customization.
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
 

Setup Cost

Devo offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing, though metadata costs and subscription models may affect overall expenses.
Logpoint offers affordable, transparent pricing with fixed and subscription options, remaining competitive compared to other SIEM solutions.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
 

Valuable Features

Devo's Activeboards offer intuitive, fast data visualization with high-speed queries, real-time analytics, and seamless integration for effective insights.
Logpoint excels with advanced logging, user-friendly interface, cost-effective pricing, and integrates UEBA and SOAR in one package.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
Exabeam's advantage is its AI-driven network AI; this AI feature is available, and Exabeam is powerful.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in Log Management
43rd
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
36th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (11th), AIOps (20th)
Logpoint
Ranking in Log Management
34th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
31st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (12th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (45th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Logpoint0.9%
Devo1.0%
Other98.1%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn - PeerSpot reviewer
Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations
When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.
Rifat Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication
I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
25%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with Devo?
They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
Devo is a SIEM replacement technology used to run security operations. It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC. This system is the central cyber...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
What needs improvement with LogPoint?
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not. Additionally, there should be compliance mapping, where the features and actions within Logpoint map to security compliance standards.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Logpoint and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.