Digital.ai Deploy vs GitLab comparison

"This product is an innovative market leader in the field of application deployment."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is vendor-agnostic and it has a file called Manifest, which makes it possible for developers, ops people, and system admins to cooperate."

"The solution creates a manifest file that caps the bridge between the developer and the system admin."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

"The stability is good."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"A user friendly solution."

"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."

"We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people."

"The scalability is good."

"The tool needs to improve on cloud-native GitOps."

"While it is a flexible product and provides a means of integrating with virtually anything, the company should make a better effort to keep up with new platform integrations."

"The solution currently has a bug that causes performance issues. They need to resolve this in a future release."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"GitLab's UI could be improved."

"Atlassian offers more products than GitLab. GitLab offers source control management, version control and collaboration between developers. Atlassian offers features on top of this as well as more integration points for developers."

"There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

"Reporting could be improved."

"GitLab could improve by having more plugins and better user-friendliness."

"I would like to see security increased in the future. A secure environment is very important."

"The product’s pricing is acceptable. We get volume discounts."

"Pricing costs are based on annual subscriptions."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."