DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs HPE System Management Homepage comparison

Broadcom and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Server Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #24, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in SM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Read 121 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews

346 Views
206 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE System Management Homepage

Read 8 HPE System Management Homepage reviews

564 Views
454 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

HPE System Management Homepage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

HPE System Management Homepage and DX Unified Infrastructure Management compete in the infrastructure management category. DX Unified Infrastructure Management seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and better performance, while HPE System Management Homepage is appreciated for its pricing and support.

Features: HPE System Management Homepage users highlight its effective monitoring tools, centralized management of hardware and software, and responsive customer support. DX Unified Infrastructure Management users value its extensive integration capabilities, proactive monitoring, scalability, broader range of integrations, and better suitability for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: HPE System Management Homepage users suggest enhancements in reporting features, user experience, and advanced customization options. DX Unified Infrastructure Management users look for improvements in the initial setup process, advanced analytics, and interface intuitiveness. DX’s feedback focuses on setup complexities whereas HPE’s feedback is centered on user experience and reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE System Management Homepage is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a more complex deployment but compensates with excellent support once operational. HPE offers easier onboarding while DX provides robust post-deployment assistance.

Pricing and ROI: HPE System Management Homepage is favored for its cost-effectiveness and faster ROI. DX Unified Infrastructure Management, though higher in price, is considered worth the investment for its comprehensive feature set and long-term benefits. Users find HPE more budget-friendly with quick returns, while DX is recognized for its extended value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. HPE System Management Homepage Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. HPE System Management Homepage

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,712 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...

Ranking in Server Monitoring

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (75th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)

HPE System Management Homepage

Ranking in Server Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M

Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support

There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.

Read full review

Juan Esteban

Consultant at Freelance

Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part

The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."

"Latest version of tool comes integrated with Jaspersoft reporting solution, giving excellent reports."

"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."

"Great customized dashboards and drill down reports with auto serve analytics."

"I definitely appreciate the flexibility and ease of use. We've been using UIM for almost three years now. It's pretty much point and click, very easy to use. And we've had no problems scaling it to our own environment."

"The benefit is easy installation. Thus, the model approach of the product and out-of-the-box probes, which deliver direct value."

"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."

"Great out-of-the-box capability."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

Cons

"A useful feature to have would be automatic configuration per standard by new robots that check in for any particular customer."

"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."

"I'd also like to see more probes. More probes in the sense that we were coming across devices that we're expected to monitor and manage for which, out of the box, there isn't a nice, clean solution. There are probes that are dedicated for certain devices and certain device types, which is great. But then there are times we come across nuanced products that we have to develop our own solution for. There are probes that exist in there that allow us to make a customized solution, but it takes a lot more time."

"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."

"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."

"Better support and more accessible resources are crucial. Customers have expressed that support is not as flexible, and it is difficult to obtain necessary information quickly."

"The biggest feature that I've been hoping they would enhance on is inventory management: things like adding/removing nodes."

"CA UIM needs some improvement with performance reporting (if we compare it to CA eHealth)."

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."

"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."

"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."

"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."

"CAD $400,000 annually."

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."

"Customers pay for the license and the support."

"The price of this product is fair."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,712 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?

We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?

The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE System Management?

The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?

My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE System Management?

The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 23% of the time

Nagios XI vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 18% of the time

Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 82% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management

April 2025

DX Unified Infrastructure Management report

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

March 2025

Download HPE System Management Homepage product report

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager

HP System Management

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex

Infotec

Buyer's Guide

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. HPE System Management Homepage

March 2025

Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. HPE System Management Homepage

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. HPE System Management Homepage and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,712 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. HPE System Management Homepage report.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.