Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Easy2Patch vs NinjaOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Easy2Patch
Ranking in Patch Management
44th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NinjaOne
Ranking in Patch Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (23rd), Server Monitoring (9th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (11th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), MSP Backup (4th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Easy2Patch?
Share your opinion
Aziz Lyazami - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly
I had recently dealt with something that was frustrating in NinjaOne, but I don't remember what it was. I would love it if I could deploy automation processes for locations because, currently, at my workplace, we can't deploy automation processes for locations. In NinjaOne, there is a need to create groups. I already have 12 or 14 locations, where sometimes I just want to deploy some updates, software, or something for specific locations, but I can't do so since I have to go and create a group for that location, which is a lot more work, which I don't like. I would love it if the aforementioned area is considered for improvement. The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best. I think NinjaOne has been working on its ticketing system. I have seen how there has been a huge improvement in the tool recently, but it is still not as good as the ticket systems in the market. At my workplace, we don't use ticketing systems. I am waiting for NinjaOne to improve its ticketing system so that I can use it. There is a lot of room for growth and adding more features in NinjaOne. I love how NinjaOne gives its users the possibility to create a custom field, allowing them to create whatever they want. I haven't used NinjaOne a lot, so I don't have anything in mind as to what extra features it needs to have. If I just sit down and look at NinjaOne, I will get a list of things I would love to have in it.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
7%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about NinjaOne?
NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?
The pricing for NinjaOne is appropriate for small companies. Customers feel that the cost is not too high for the features they need but might be unwilling to pay more for additional features such ...
What needs improvement with NinjaOne?
Improvements could be made to reduce NinjaOne's functionalities to focus more on inventory or remote help tools. Many features are not needed for our purposes currently. Security and reporting, inc...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Google 4. IBM 5. Intel 6. Microsoft 7. Oracle 8. SAP 9. VMware 10. Adobe 11. Autodesk 12. CA Technologies 13. Check Point 14. Citrix 15. EMC 16. F Networks 17. FireEye 18. Gartner 19. HP 20. IBM 21. Juniper Networks 22. Kaspersky 23. McAfee 24. NetApp 25. Palo Alto Networks 26. Qualcomm 27. Red Hat 28. SolarWinds 29. Symantec 30. Trend Micro 31. Verizon 32. Western Digital
Status Pros, Mitchell and Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.