N-able N-central vs NinjaOne comparison

Read 25 NinjaOne reviews

15,529 Views
3,261 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

N-able N-central and NinjaOne are competing products in the IT management space. N-able N-central has the upper hand in terms of advanced functionality and customization, while NinjaOne is noted for its ease of use and quick deployment.

Features: N-able N-central offers extensive automation capabilities and robust asset tracking, enabling detailed network monitoring and proactive issue resolution. Its remote control functions allow seamless access to various devices. Meanwhile, NinjaOne provides integrated remote monitoring and management, as well as strong support for SaaS applications, making patch management efficient and straightforward. Additionally, NinjaOne's scripting capabilities allow for automated task scheduling.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-central could improve in ease of use, particularly for less experienced users, and speed up their deployment process. Enhancements in its mobile app would also be beneficial. NinjaOne could enhance its patch management configuration options and improve automation features for better efficiency. Greater customization in remote monitoring would also benefit users needing tailored solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NinjaOne is known for its quick deployment and responsive customer support, minimizing disruptions. N-able N-central, while comprehensive, involves a more complex setup intended for seasoned IT teams. Its support excels in providing tailored solutions suitable for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-central's pricing is designed for larger enterprises with upfront costs but promises long-term savings through extensive capabilities. NinjaOne's transparent pricing structure aligns well with small to mid-sized businesses, often providing a quick return on investment within the first six months.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able N-central vs. NinjaOne Report (Updated: August 2026).

N-able N-central vs. NinjaOne

Download the complete report

Helped 910,409 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NinjaOne

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (6th), Network Monitoring Software (10th), Server Monitoring (2nd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Remote Access (8th), Vulnerability Management (19th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (4th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (8th), Patch Management (3rd), MSP Backup (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (5th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of N-able N-central is 5.5%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NinjaOne is 10.4%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NinjaOne	10.4%
N-able N-central	5.5%
Other	84.1%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Nyiko Malapane

Senior Operations Specialist at Tagit cc

Transition has been smooth and integration supports compliance with ease

The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth. We were confident that our migration would not affect any operations. It was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions. What we have experienced is that only branding has changed along with the way reports are structured. The solution is more advanced and the transition was well thought out. The process is managed properly. Regarding the integration capabilities of N-able N-central, my colleagues who work with this solution recently completed an ISO quality audit. The auditor could understand and manage how we handle our assets and environment because it's quite simple, even for someone who doesn't use the platform daily. This demonstrates that we are using a solution that meets our compliance requirements. N-able N-central is easy to use. Once licenses are provisioned, it's simple for my team to deploy the solution from anywhere remotely, provided there is internet access or remote access to the device.

Read full review

Not Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support

NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth; we were confident that our migration would not affect any operations, and it was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

More N-able N-central pros

"Since NinjaOne was implemented, I would say it represents a huge positive change."

"The standout feature of NinjaOne is that we do not have to open any ports for access, which is great for security."

"The most valuable features of NinjaOne include remote desktop management, support and assistive tools, and screen sharing."

"NinjaOne saves me time and improves my troubleshooting process by providing information automatically so I don't have to search for it."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"The installation is easy, it only took two minutes."

"NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance."

"NinjaOne helped us address our user complaints regarding the system as well as providing us the ability to push software updates directly from NinjaOne to the user's device."

More NinjaOne pros

Cons

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"It was previously expensive and tedious to manage different licenses."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"N-central has limited mobile device management (MDM) support, specifically for Android devices. This limitation affected a deal with a client who had numerous Android devices to manage. It would be beneficial if N-central could expand its MDM support to include Android devices."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

More N-able N-central cons

"To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki."

"Maximizing the screen during an SSH connection is not possible, which hampers usability on Linux servers."

"The reporting is lackluster. NinjaOne is great for maintaining systems, but it's hard to use it to understand the state that systems are in without going in and mining the information myself. I rate the reporting two out of 10."

"There was a lot of delay with NinjaOne's ticketing system. For example, when a user creates a ticket and raises an issue, it would take 30 to 40 minutes to appear on the IT side. So the time delay issue is the main point."

"I want NinjaOne to improve the reports."

"The ability to not have a NinjaOne agent or multiple NinjaOne agents on a singular device is a big pain point for the device, and secondly, the macOS support is also what keeps it from being a higher score."

"The one feature that I believe needs improvement is the software patching."

"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne."

More NinjaOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

"It roughly costs $400 a month. It provides a good value because of the number of tools that you get in the solution. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing. There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"NinjaOne's price is fine since my workplace is an educational institution, so we get the product at a really good price considering that we do not pay taxes, making the prices very fair and worth the product."

"Its pricing is great."

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,409 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that I think it is very reasonable for the product that we get.

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

To improve NinjaOne, there should be better integration between multiple different software including Cisco and Meraki.

What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?

My main use case for NinjaOne is managing machines over multiple networks and locations. For managing machines across those networks or locations, we have NinjaOne deployed on all our machines, and...

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 9% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 8% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 6% of the time

Avast Business Hub vs N-able N-central

Compared 6% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Atera vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

Tanium vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

Kaseya 365 vs NinjaOne

Compared 3% of the time

ServiceNow vs NinjaOne

Compared 2% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Product Reports

N-able N-central

Download N-able N-central product report

Download NinjaOne product report

Also Known As

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

No data available

Overview

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.

NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.

What are the most important features?

Remote Monitoring: Essential for real-time insights into network and device performance.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency in IT management.
Patch Management: Timely updates for software and system security.
Mobile App: Ensures alerts and management capabilities on the go.
Third-Party Integrations: Enhances functionality by working with tools like Bitdefender.

What benefits can users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Appeals to small companies seeking budget-friendly IT solutions.
Performance Tracking: Improved SLA system aids in efficient performance monitoring.
Enhanced Management: Effective use of scripts and policies streamline operations.
Client Interaction: Better remote session management and asset control.

NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.

Sample Customers

Premier Technology Solutions

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

N-able N-central vs. NinjaOne