Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atera vs N-able N-central comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Atera's support is highly rated for being responsive, knowledgeable, proactive, and professional, with frequent updates and effective security measures.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.3
Atera requires better identity management, integrations, mobile features, network monitoring, automation, interface updates, and enhanced security for a superior user experience.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Atera is a scalable, versatile tool suitable for all company sizes, effectively managing diverse endpoints and clients with ease.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Atera's fixed per-technician fee offers predictable, scalable pricing with affordable integrations, making it cost-effective compared to competitors.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Atera is highly stable and reliable with minimal downtime, frequent updates, and rare issues, often external in origin.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Atera offers robust PowerShell commands, seamless remote access, effective automation, cross-platform support, intuitive interface, and proactive issue resolution tools.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Atera
Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
3rd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
IT Service Management (ITSM) (14th), Patch Management (8th)
N-able N-central
Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 13.5%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 12.8%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
 

Featured Reviews

CB
Pay just one price for unlimited devices and remote features enable easy access to all end points regardless of their location
When it comes to ease of use and the user interface I would give Atera a nine out of 10. The platform responsiveness to everything is solid. The updates Atera has put out have been second to none. Moreover, I find that if it wasn't for Atera, I wouldn't be gaining the number of clients I have and growing my business as I do. Atera provides ease of access to all devices no matter where they're located. It makes no difference if the client is in a work group or if he is on a certain domain. Atera enables me to access our clients' devices with ease and to provide them with feedback across the board. It benefits both me and my clients. When it comes to pushing out anything, such as antivirus features, it's second to none. As I'm more of a hands-on person, I visit many of my clients. Often, while visiting a client site, another client will call. With Atera, I am able to remotely handle whatever needs to be done to his machine, be it installing a printer or helping with a password. When a client calls and needs something handled quickly, Atera is a big help. On a daily basis, it saves me time and approximately seven to 10 hours per week. Were I not always going around to all my clients, it would save me even more time.
Brian Hershey - PeerSpot reviewer
We were able to scale from 1,000 devices to more than 20,000
We had several run-level platforms, including Continuum, but the only other one I've run is Nagios. That was custom-built for Unix devices. Our previous RMMs weren't scalable like N-central. We ran into problems we created for ourselves, not knowing enough about what we were doing in the beginning. Ultimately, we found that we had gotten to a place that we couldn't come back from, and it was easier to change RMMs rather than trying to fix what we had.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Retailer
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
24%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
5%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?
Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.
What needs improvement with Atera?
It should improve its processes.
What is your primary use case for Atera?
Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.
What needs improvement with N-able N-central?
N-central has limited mobile device management (MDM) support, specifically for Android devices. This limitation affected a deal with a client who had numerous Android devices to manage. It would be...
What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?
N-able N-central has various use cases and can be utilized for monitoring systems, servers, and infrastructure like routers and firewalls, as well as for automation, patch management, remote manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera. 
Premier Technology Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.