Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ElectroNeek vs Nintex RPA comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
ElectroNeek is considered moderately to highly scalable, supporting modular programming in JavaScript and Python for diverse applications.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.0
ElectroNeek needs improved integration, pricing, custom activities, remote desktop support, Edge compatibility, OCR, and web scraping features.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
ElectroNeek offers affordable, user-friendly automation with no-code features, unlimited bots, intuitive design, and comprehensive learning resources.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
ElectroNeek is stable and cost-effective, though users report interface challenges and stability issues across platform versions.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
ElectroNeek customer service is generally responsive and effective, with high ratings despite occasional delays in addressing issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
ElectroNeek offers affordable enterprise solutions with initial costs offset by low recurrent fees, receiving a satisfaction rating of 7-8/10.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

ElectroNeek
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
16th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (10th)
Nintex RPA
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of ElectroNeek is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Ishmael Munyai - PeerSpot reviewer
With an easy initial setup phase in place, the tool needs to provide functionalities like web scraping to users
It is a very scalable solution. In ElectroNeek, you can build your project in modular programming or with the use of sub-programs. You can have a lot of sub-programs that make up a whole project. If you don't wanna use the drag-and-drop activities, you can use JavaScript or Python instead. So it's very useful when you are working with things such as SPS. Actually, you can write scripts to support all the product functionalities with Python and manage the product's functions. You will find a company named Apollo Studios on the website of ElectroNeek. I think they are one of the best companies in South Africa that entered into a partnership with ElectroNeek.
JonathanNg - PeerSpot reviewer
Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows
To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ElectroNeek?
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ElectroNeek?
My company has made a payment towards the purchase of a license from ElectorNeek.
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 5250 emulator, in addition Datamatics TruBot is an alternative solution.
What do you like most about Nintex RPA?
Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nintex RPA?
Although Nintex RPA is expensive, it is somewhat affordable considering its features. I would rate the cost aspect as an eight out of ten.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ElectroNeek RPA
Kryon RPA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UFP, Clariant, Ricoh, FMBCapital, RePower
Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart
Find out what your peers are saying about ElectroNeek vs. Nintex RPA and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.