Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access comparison

Entrust Datacard and Thales Cloud Security are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Entrust Datacard is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6, while Thales Cloud Security is ranked #27. Entrust Datacard holds a 0.9% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Thales Cloud Security’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Entrust Datacard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales Cloud Security users who would recommend it.

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

374 Views
267 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Read 3 Thales SafeNet Trusted Access reviews

432 Views
260 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Entrust Identity Enterprise and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access compete in the identity management sector. Entrust may attract users with its better pricing and support, while Thales stands out for its advanced features, justifying higher costs.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers robust identity and access management capabilities, seamless integration with legacy systems, and extensive platform compatibility. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access provides comprehensive multi-factor authentication, strong analytics for security insights, and depth of security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers exceptional deployment flexibility and responsive support, aiding smooth transitions. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is known for straightforward deployment and specializes in customizing solutions for complex environments, supported by technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise is recognized for reasonable setup costs and delivering solid ROI through its versatile solutions. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, while potentially more expensive initially, justifies costs with notable security enhancements and enterprise-level features.

To learn more, read our detailed Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (10th)

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (20th), Access Management (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

GauravMathur

Vice President Information Technology at Mind

Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well

I'm not saying that we want to switch the product, however, since the requirement has increased, we are looking at other options that may be better suited. The scalability may not there. We have a few specific use cases where we have to avoid the cloud. Especially in Europe, we're not allowed to carry their phone in factories. We need some sort of secure access solution. There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure. I am paying to SafeNet and in parallel, I also need to pay Microsoft to use the same service. That makes no sense, to pay double. If they could do something about it, that would be very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"The interface is easy to use."

"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."

"The solution is simple to use."

Cons

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."

"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."

"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It's worth the money."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

44%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Venafi vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Entrust Identity Essentials vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 33% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 26% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 21% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Compared 20% of the time

More Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

April 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

March 2025

Download Thales SafeNet Trusted Access product report

Also Known As

IdentityGuard

SafeNet Trusted Access, Gemalto SafeNet Trusted Access

Overview

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust Datacard

Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is a comprehensive access management solution that provides secure and seamless access to cloud and web applications. It offers a range of features, including multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and adaptive authentication. With SafeNet, organizations can easily manage user access, enforce security policies, and monitor user activity to prevent cyber threats.

The solution is highly scalable and can be customized to meet the unique needs of any organization. Overall, SafeNet is a reliable and effective solution for preventing cyber threats and ensuring secure access to critical applications and data.

Thales Cloud Security

Sample Customers

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

IBM, Western Union, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Novartis, and AT&T.

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

March 2025

Free Report: Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.