We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I primarily use this solution for hybrid deployment, security, securing resources and for integration purposes. In terms of security, we have been using the B2B/B2C hybrid integration with the certificate authentication."
"Multi-factor authentication really secures our environments and gives us the flexibility to use location-based policies. Azure AD also gives us a lot of flexibility in our scope of integration."
"Azure AD allowed us to get rid of servers and other hardware running at our offices. We moved everything to the cloud. Once we set up roles and permissions, it's only a matter of adding people and removing people from different groups and letting permissions flow through."
"It is pretty good in terms of stability."
"The visibility and control for permission management are excellent."
"Technical support has been great."
"Azure Active Directory features have helped improve our security posture. The remote working has been a massive help during the pandemic."
"We use BitLocker for policy enforcement. And now, because of the Microsoft 365 Business Premium package, we get Intune as a part of it. That's very useful for us for setting policies and managing the systems. The biggest strength of Azure AD is Intune."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The licensing and support are expensive and have room for improvement."
"They should put the features of P1 and P2 into a single license."
"Better integration with external governance products would be a welcome addition to Azure AD."
"The ability to manage and authenticate against on-premises solutions would be beneficial."
"Customers should be informed that public review features are not intended for production use."
"Azure Active Directory could improve the two-factor authentication."
"The product needs to improve its support."
"The Azure AD Application Proxy, which helps you publish applications in a secure way, has room for improvement. We are moving from another solution into the Application Proxy and it's quite detailed. Depending on the role you're signing in as, you can end up at different websites, which wasn't an issue with our old solution."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO). Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Auth0. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.