Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fireblocks vs ID Quantique comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

Fireblocks
Ranking in Digital Asset Security Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ID Quantique
Ranking in Digital Asset Security Platforms
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Digital Asset Security Platforms category, the mindshare of Fireblocks is 44.0%, up from 41.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ID Quantique is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Asset Security Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Esmat Nawahda - PeerSpot reviewer
Manages everything related to blockchain transactions with security and stability
Security is the most important factor. Fireblocks are not inexpensive, but the cost is justified by the security it provides. The second key aspect is stability. Fireblocks handles the infrastructure for wallet management and transactions, which allows us to focus on preparing the necessary hooks and integrations on our end. This setup ensures we can connect and work effectively with Fireblocks while relying on their robust service and infrastructure. We explored other options previously, primarily due to cost concerns. We found some lower-cost alternatives, but we already have experience with Fireblocks, and they effectively handle our fund management needs. Fireblocks addresses all the issues we had before, and we are satisfied with their service.
Use ID Quantique?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Asset Security Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Fireblocks?
Currently, we face issues using other technologies and operating systems since the documentation is very restrictive. Here, the bank uses Red Hat, and there's a lack of flexibility to adapt Fireblo...
What is your primary use case for Fireblocks?
Fireblocks is primarily used for custody. We use it as a custody wallet where we manage all our funds within Fireblocks. Our user-facing interactions are handled through our APIs. We deal with Fire...
What advice do you have for others considering Fireblocks?
I would recommend Fireblocks to any organization looking to create its own exchange or custody service for cryptocurrency. It is an excellent choice for creating wallet transactions and holding tok...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
IDQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, National Australia Bank, BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon, Revolut, Kriptomat, Independent Reserve, Bit2Me, Genesis Capital, Galaxy Digital, QCP Captial, BlockFills, Woorton, Worldpay
University of Geneva