Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiNAC vs ThreatLocker Protect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
Fortinet FortiNAC's support is responsive with effective community forums, but faces issues with expertise, documentation, and communication.
Sentiment score
8.8
ThreatLocker Protect's customer support is fast, efficient, highly rated, but occasionally offers hasty responses needing further clarification.
It could be better, especially with response times.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Fortinet FortiNAC faces challenges in user-friendliness, integration, learning curve, support, compatibility, pricing, and configuration complexity.
Sentiment score
5.8
ThreatLocker Protect needs improved training, support, integration, customization, and flexibility to enhance user experience and network efficiency.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Fortinet FortiNAC is highly scalable, adaptable for various environments, and praised for flexible licensing and system integration.
Sentiment score
8.3
ThreatLocker Protect excels in scalability, adapting to various business sizes and efficiently managing numerous endpoints with reliable performance.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Fortinet FortiNAC pricing is high but competitive, offering feature-rich value, with reasonable maintenance for prioritized visibility and control.
Sentiment score
5.3
ThreatLocker Protect is cost-effective, appreciated for value and transparency, with flexible tiered pricing and some negotiation inconsistencies.
The pricing is reasonable and normal.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Fortinet FortiNAC is generally stable, with occasional issues during updates and HA setups, improving in recent versions.
Sentiment score
6.8
ThreatLocker Protect is stable with rare, quickly resolved issues, and appreciated for minimizing downtime and enhancing stability.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Fortinet FortiNAC delivers IoT visibility, compliance checks, automation, security, user-friendly interfaces, and integration, enhancing device management flexibility.
Sentiment score
8.6
ThreatLocker Protect offers effortless access and management with strong security features, training, and support to meet cybersecurity standards.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiNAC
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatLocker Protect
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (13th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (8th), Application Control (4th), ZTNA (8th), Ransomware Protection (6th)
 

Featured Reviews

Batu Akalin - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor
I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices. FortiNAC has improved our security posture because we made some use-case scenarios for unauthorized devices. When unauthorized device IDs enter our network, and the associated team sees a new device, they can block the attackers.
Roy Richardson - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online
We use ThreatLocker's Allowlisting to whitelist specific applications and prevent unauthorized software from running. We utilize Ringfencing to establish guardrails around implementations, ensuring that applications operate within defined boundaries. We leverage network access control to granularly control interactions between computer systems and servers. This enables us to restrict communication between specific applications, even within a locked-down environment. We employ storage control to impose additional security measures on data storage. This includes controlling access to network shares, network files, and folders, as well as USB storage devices. We can whitelist specific devices based on their serial numbers or allow access based on predefined conditions. We rely on ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support, which provides exceptional assistance and responsiveness. At any time, we can initiate a chat session and receive immediate support. If the issue requires escalation, it is promptly handled. Cyber Hero support also plays a crucial role in vetting application updates. When a user attempts to install or update an application, and the update has not been approved from a security standpoint, it is blocked by ThreatLocker. A notification is presented to the user, informing them of the block and providing an option to justify the application's need. These requests are then reviewed by ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support team, who evaluate them against our security criteria and make an informed decision to allow or deny the application. We utilize ThreatLocker's elevated control feature for applications that require administrator-level access. We avoid granting full administrative privileges to end users, as this elevates the risk of compromise if the device is infiltrated. Instead, elevated control allows us to precisely define the execution conditions for specific applications, such as QuickBooks updates. By verifying the application's signature and certificate, we can enable the update to run with administrative privileges while restricting the user's overall administrative access. Integrating ThreatLocker with other products is simple and only requires a few clicks. ThreatLocker's deployment is also very straightforward. The company provides extensive and well-written online documentation, which is continuously being improved. They also offer a variety of training resources, including university courses, training videos, webinars, and conferences. I have no complaints about the level of support and knowledge transfer provided by the company. ThreatLocker is also developing a new reporting tool, which I had the opportunity to beta test. The company has also been showcasing the new reporting tool at conferences. The new reporting tool provides a level of detail that is unmatched by any other product on the market.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
37%
Retailer
7%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Aruba ClearPass and FortiNAC?
I've done quite a lot of work with ClearPass, and not a lot with FortiNAC/Bradford. ClearPass incorporates a number of different functions including ClearPass Guest for creating complex wireless g...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiNAC?
The support responds to our queries within two to four hours.
What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
I handle the technical aspects, while my manager deals with pricing. Although the pricing seems good, there have been inconsistencies in contract negotiations. What we are told during calls sometim...
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
A valuable addition to ThreatLocker would be a column in the audit page displaying a VirusTotal score for each file. This would allow for quick identification of potentially malicious files during ...
 

Also Known As

FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
ThreatLocker Allowlisting, ThreatLocker Network Control, ThreatLocker Ringfencing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiNAC vs. ThreatLocker Protect and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.