Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiNAC vs ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.5
Fortinet FortiNAC enhances security and ROI by efficiently managing device access, reducing costs and configuration time significantly.
Sentiment score
8.2
ThreatLocker enhances security and productivity with real-time protection, leading to revenue growth and improved efficiency in one year.
The measurable benefits of using ThreatLocker include ensuring real-time protection of organizational resources and maintaining user authentication and protection levels to reduce risks.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.2
Fortinet FortiNAC's support is helpful but has delays, knowledge gaps, and lacks UK coverage; satisfaction varies around 7-9/10.
Sentiment score
8.4
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection offers highly-rated, efficient customer service, with rapid response times and knowledgeable support, achieving user satisfaction.
They provide sessions to help with various questions.
ThreatLocker's technical support process could be streamlined by reducing the number of steps required to reach a human agent.
It could be better, especially with response times.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Fortinet FortiNAC is scalable and adaptable, effectively managing various enterprise sizes, though licensing costs can be challenging.
Sentiment score
8.3
ThreatLocker efficiently scales for all business sizes, seamlessly managing thousands of endpoints without issues, supporting diverse infrastructures.
The pricing model makes it challenging as the cost is substantial due to the per-node licensing model.
It is scalable to an extent, depending on where it is used.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Fortinet FortiNAC receives mixed stability reviews, with performance improving over time but some users preferring alternative solutions.
Sentiment score
6.8
ThreatLocker offers stable endpoint protection, with minimal issues that are quickly resolved, enhancing reliability and performance for users.
Stability can be improved as there are times it goes down or requires management to adjust policies.
 

Room For Improvement

Fortinet FortiNAC users face challenges with integration, user interface, support, and cost, citing a high learning curve.
ThreatLocker could enhance its platform with flexible training, user interface improvements, better integrations, and more comprehensive support.
Improvement in the interface design would make FortiNAC a better solution.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
 

Setup Cost

Fortinet FortiNAC offers competitive pricing with various licensing options, providing good value despite initial high costs per device.
Enterprise users value ThreatLocker's cost-effective Zero Trust Platform for its comprehensive features, excellent support, and customizable tiered pricing.
 

Valuable Features

Fortinet FortiNAC excels in network visibility, integration, security, user-friendliness, and adaptability, with strong support and automation.
ThreatLocker offers mobile access, zero trust protection, granular control, and support, enhancing security and reducing management costs.
I appreciate the feature where it can connect with different vendor equipment, regardless of the network devices from other vendors.
ThreatLocker's most valuable feature is its scanning capability, which executes all types of executable files.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiNAC
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatLocker Zero Trust End...
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (8th), Application Control (4th), ZTNA (8th), Ransomware Protection (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiNAC is 18.2%, up from 15.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
 

Featured Reviews

Batu Akalin - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor
I like FortiNAC's integration with other Fortinet devices. They work together well, but the solution also works with other network devices. FortiNAC has improved our security posture because we made some use-case scenarios for unauthorized devices. When unauthorized device IDs enter our network, and the associated team sees a new device, they can block the attackers.
Roy Richardson - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online
We use ThreatLocker's Allowlisting to whitelist specific applications and prevent unauthorized software from running. We utilize Ringfencing to establish guardrails around implementations, ensuring that applications operate within defined boundaries. We leverage network access control to granularly control interactions between computer systems and servers. This enables us to restrict communication between specific applications, even within a locked-down environment. We employ storage control to impose additional security measures on data storage. This includes controlling access to network shares, network files, and folders, as well as USB storage devices. We can whitelist specific devices based on their serial numbers or allow access based on predefined conditions. We rely on ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support, which provides exceptional assistance and responsiveness. At any time, we can initiate a chat session and receive immediate support. If the issue requires escalation, it is promptly handled. Cyber Hero support also plays a crucial role in vetting application updates. When a user attempts to install or update an application, and the update has not been approved from a security standpoint, it is blocked by ThreatLocker. A notification is presented to the user, informing them of the block and providing an option to justify the application's need. These requests are then reviewed by ThreatLocker's Cyber Hero support team, who evaluate them against our security criteria and make an informed decision to allow or deny the application. We utilize ThreatLocker's elevated control feature for applications that require administrator-level access. We avoid granting full administrative privileges to end users, as this elevates the risk of compromise if the device is infiltrated. Instead, elevated control allows us to precisely define the execution conditions for specific applications, such as QuickBooks updates. By verifying the application's signature and certificate, we can enable the update to run with administrative privileges while restricting the user's overall administrative access. Integrating ThreatLocker with other products is simple and only requires a few clicks. ThreatLocker's deployment is also very straightforward. The company provides extensive and well-written online documentation, which is continuously being improved. They also offer a variety of training resources, including university courses, training videos, webinars, and conferences. I have no complaints about the level of support and knowledge transfer provided by the company. ThreatLocker is also developing a new reporting tool, which I had the opportunity to beta test. The company has also been showcasing the new reporting tool at conferences. The new reporting tool provides a level of detail that is unmatched by any other product on the market.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
825,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
38%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is the biggest difference between Aruba ClearPass and FortiNAC?
I've done quite a lot of work with ClearPass, and not a lot with FortiNAC/Bradford. ClearPass incorporates a number of different functions including ClearPass Guest for creating complex wireless g...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiNAC?
The support responds to our queries within two to four hours.
What do you like most about ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
I handle the technical aspects, while my manager deals with pricing. Although the pricing seems good, there have been inconsistencies in contract negotiations. What we are told during calls sometim...
What needs improvement with ThreatLocker Allowlisting?
ThreatLocker would benefit from incorporating an antivirus feature or comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring, a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
 

Also Known As

FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiNAC vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
825,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.