Fugue vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Snyk and Tenable are both solutions in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category. Snyk is ranked #37, while Tenable is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Snyk holds a 0.1% mindshare in CSPM, compared to Tenable’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Snyk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Fugue

Read 2 Fugue reviews

167 Views
97 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Security Center

Read 54 Tenable Security Center reviews

1,530 Views
1,173 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Fugue

Tenable Security Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Tenable Security Center and Fugue are leading solutions in the cybersecurity market. Fugue appears to have the upper hand due to its robust compliance automation which users highly value.

Features: Tenable Security Center offers comprehensive vulnerability management, detailed reporting, and integration with various security tools. Fugue provides compliance automation, infrastructure visibility, and proactive compliance maintenance.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center needs improved scalability, better cloud integration, and a more intuitive interface. Fugue could benefit from reducing its learning curve, offering more user-friendly documentation, and enhancing the setup process for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center's deployment is detailed but can be complex and time-consuming, with reliable customer service. Fugue's deployment is faster and straightforward, with responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is seen as having a high initial setup cost but provides good ROI through extensive security insights. Fugue's competitive pricing and strong compliance management result in a compelling ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Fugue vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fugue vs. Tenable Security Center

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fugue

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

37th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (45th)

Tenable Security Center

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (4th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) category, the mindshare of Fugue is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Featured Reviews

BorisVishnevsky

Sr.Dir/Managing Principal Technology Consulting at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Easy to use and consume, stable with excellent customization

It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities. Fugue is cybersecurity, an operational monitoring solution, which has a broad set of capabilities. However, one needs to have substantial know-how in the cybersecurity domain to be able to identify and zero in on specific Fugue capabilities that may be relevant to a particular project or workstream pursuit. Being a system integrator, for us, it isn't an issue. For a client that is new to Fugue or relatively new to cybersecurity, it would be quite challenging to zero in on a specific sweet spot or capability.

Read full review

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."

"The customization is excellent."

"It allows financial institutions to compare their vulnerability management to others in the same sector."

"The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping."

"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."

"This product has the best results in terms of the lowest number of false-positives and false-negatives."

"Tenable.sc's best features are the availability model, accident management, and scoring."

"Support is knowledgeable."

"The most valuable feature of the product is the Assurance Report Card, which gives us an overview of the security poster in just a simple glance."

"One of the most valuable features is their distributed scan model for allotting engines to work together as a pool and handle multiple scans at once, across multiple environments. Automatic scanning distribution is a distinguishing feature of their toolset."

More Tenable Security Center pros

Cons

"It would be ideal if there was customization with a focus on specific cybersecurity areas or capabilities."

"The general input I have is that there is an opportunity for them to better align with other similar tools and better align with similar capabilities that cloud suppliers deliver natively."

"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."

"Though the solution's technical support is responsive, they do take a lot of time, making it one of the solution's shortcomings that needs improvement."

"The solution needs to improve the vulnerability assessment because we have experienced some challenges with accuracy."

"The web application is not very functional."

"The solution is expensive."

"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"

"The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool."

"Tenable SC can improve by adding more integrations with HCI-type tools and more accurate vulnerability detection."

More Tenable Security Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other companies or other products it could maybe be a little bit less, but the price is okay. I would say it's not very expensive."

"The price can start at €10,000 ($13,000 USD) for between 500 and 1,000 assets, and the price can climb into the millions as more assets are added."

"Tenable SC is priced per asset, with the basic solution starting around US$12,000 for 500 assets."

"Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."

"The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."

"Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."

"It is a bit expensive. Everything is included in the license."

"I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing. The licensing requirements can be prohibitive for managed security service ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs Fugue

Compared 50% of the time

Wiz vs Fugue

Compared 50% of the time

More Fugue Competitors

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 16% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2025

Download Fugue product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

March 2025

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Also Known As

Luminal

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Overview

Fugue is an infrastructure-level cloud operating system. It builds, operates, and terminates cloud infrastructure and services and automates the continuous enforcement of declared infrastructure configurations. Fugue completes the DevOps workflow by automating cloud lifecycle management via enforced and versionable infrastructure as code. Fugue is a single source of truth and trust for the cloud.

Snyk

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Sample Customers

SAP, PBS, TrueCar, TravelBank

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Buyer's Guide

Fugue vs. Tenable Security Center

March 2025

Free Report: Fugue vs. Tenable Security Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Fugue vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fugue vs. Tenable Security Center report.

See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.