Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fusion Framework vs RSA Archer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fusion Framework
Ranking in GRC
32nd
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
22nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RSA Archer
Ranking in GRC
1st
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
IT Governance (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of Fusion Framework is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 16.3%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fusion Framework?
Share your opinion
Raviteja Nekkanti - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 17, 2023
User-friendly, minimal learning curve and good for security assessment
My use case is for security assessment. It's my daily task. I use it for security assessment in Azure. We have tickets where users need to submit details about an application, computer, or server. For Archer, my direct task is to assess the security risk of an application, infrastructure, or…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"RSA Archer's price is justifiable and not as expensive, compared to ServiceNow. I have heard that the licensing for ServiceNow is much more expensive. I'm unaware whether there are any additional costs after licensing fees."
"Fairly highly-priced, especially for smaller companies."
"At the higher end of the price scale, but provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"I am not 100% familiar with that, especially with their new model. I just know that the way they've licensed per user to scale is good."
"As I am a developer and responsible for providing production support, I do not have personal knowledge of the pricing. However, my colleagues claim that it is very expensive in comparison with other tools."
"The solution is not at all a cheap product."
"I am not sure about other companies, but it's quite expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
38%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Educational Organization
51%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RSA Archer?
It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance.
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you ...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
We primarily use the system control module and specific IT control models for ongoing risk assessment activities. We use it on a day-to-day basis.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Archer
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aureon, ETS, Discount Tire, Box,
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, OneTrust and others in GRC. Updated: October 2024.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.