Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance vs RSA Archer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Communica...
Ranking in GRC
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Digital Risk Protection (5th), Microsoft Security Suite (32nd)
RSA Archer
Ranking in GRC
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
IT Governance (1st), IT Vendor Risk Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 16.3%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

SK
Nov 28, 2023
Helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework
Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework.  The product should incorporate more automation with the help of AI. I have been working with the product for more than one year.  We get good support from Microsoft.…
JD
Feb 1, 2023
Great for tracking risks and policy creation but is a little outdated
The technology's a little outdated. They need to get a little bit more updated. AuditBoard and Workiva, as examples, are built on later or newer versions of the technology stacks and just have a little bit more to offer and a little bit easier to implement and integrate. Archer's just a little bit, in the current structure, older. that said, obviously, it has the most sophistication of any of the platforms out there. There are no features that need to be added. It's really making the technology more current and upgrading the technology stack to where it works a little bit more seamlessly and efficiently. Being an older technology, some of the integrations and some of the things you need to do are a little harder and a little bit more old school, if you will, than a little bit of the open-style integrations that you have today with some of the newer tools.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework."
"Solution is scalable."
"RSA Archer has reduced the time and effort required for meetings."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"It has the best workload management features."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
 

Cons

"The product should incorporate more automation with the help of AI."
"The product is expensive."
"Recently, we made a suggestion for cross references, like for one application to another. There were limitations there, so we're hoping that will be included in the next upgrade."
"In a future release, there should be an option to upload the main data."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."
"Performance could be improved."
"Slow turnaround time from support team."
"The technology's a little outdated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is okay. The licensing costs are very reasonable; it is very affordable to us."
"It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing."
"As I am a developer and responsible for providing production support, I do not have personal knowledge of the pricing. However, my colleagues claim that it is very expensive in comparison with other tools."
"I am not sure about other companies, but it's quite expensive."
"Fairly highly-priced, especially for smaller companies."
"The solution is not at all a cheap product."
"The solution's price should be reduced. You only have to pay the license and there are no additional fees."
"The price of RSA Archer is good. The price isn't too high considering it is a leading tool in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
806,727 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
50%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance?
Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance?
The product should incorporate more automation with the help of AI.
What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance?
Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance's integration with other devices is helpful since most people are always on their mobiles. The product must consider different regulations since you canno...
What do you like most about RSA Archer?
It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance.
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you ...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
We primarily use the system control module and specific IT control models for ongoing risk assessment activities. We use it on a day-to-day basis.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Archer
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, OneTrust and others in GRC. Updated: August 2024.
806,727 professionals have used our research since 2012.