GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

GitHub and IBM are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.0. GitHub holds a 5.3% mindshare in VC, compared to IBM’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,282 Views
1,022 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Rational ClearCase

Read 6 IBM Rational ClearCase reviews

671 Views
494 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Both IBM Rational ClearCase and GitHub compete in version control and collaboration. GitHub takes the lead with its user-friendly approach and extensive integration options that align with modern development needs.

Features: IBM Rational ClearCase offers robust configuration management, dynamic views, and file versioning, tailored for complex enterprise projects. GitHub provides streamlined collaboration, extensive open-source integrations, and social coding features, appealing to agile teams.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational ClearCase could enhance its modern usability and integration with newer tools. Improvements in user experience and deployment simplicity could also broaden its appeal. GitHub could benefit from offering more advanced enterprise features, enhanced offline capabilities, and improved management of large binary files.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational ClearCase requires extensive setup suitable for complex enterprise needs, with structured support reflecting a traditional approach. GitHub's cloud-based deployment is straightforward and fast, minimizing setup efforts. Its flexible support model is well-suited for dynamic teams.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational ClearCase involves significant initial costs and high operational expenses due to infrastructure demands. Its ROI is aligned with capabilities in managing large projects with strict change control. GitHub's tiered pricing is seen as more cost-effective, supporting diverse team sizes and budgets. The ROI is enhanced by promoting development efficiency and adaptability in agile projects.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,737 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

IBM Rational ClearCase

Ranking in Version Control

8th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 5.3%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational ClearCase is 3.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Yong Seok Kang

Technical Consultant at MTRiver Consulting

Useful for version control but UI is slow

I would recommend IBM Rational ClearCase based on customer requirements. Ultimately, the decision should be based on individual circumstances and budget considerations. Some organizations have transitioned away from the tool due to its slow performance and high costs, opting for more powerful systems. I rate it a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

"Our code is secure."

"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

More GitHub pros

"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."

"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."

"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

Cons

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

"Scalability is an area with a shortcoming, because of which it has room for improvement."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

More GitHub cons

"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."

"The protection needs to be improved."

"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive."

"This is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,737 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

30%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Rational ClearCase?

The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational ClearCase?

IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ClearCase?

The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Surround SCM vs GitHub

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Git vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 39% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 24% of the time

Bitbucket vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Rational ClearCase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

February 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

February 2025

Download IBM Rational ClearCase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rational ClearCase

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

IBM

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Atos SE, FEI, STM

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

January 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,737 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.