GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

GitHub and IBM are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.0. GitHub holds a 5.4% mindshare in VC, compared to IBM’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,722 Views
1,162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Rational ClearCase

Read 6 IBM Rational ClearCase reviews

734 Views
533 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

IBM Rational ClearCase and GitHub are two prominent version control systems competing in the software development space. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its modern features and user-friendly interface.

Features: IBM Rational ClearCase is known for its powerful integration with other IBM tools, advanced branching, and access control features. GitHub stands out with its collaboration tools, support for continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD), and extensive integration with third-party applications.

Room for Improvement: Users of IBM Rational ClearCase point out that its learning curve is steep, outdated UI, and lack of modern features. GitHub users suggest improvements in security, performance with large repositories, and enhanced enterprise management tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational ClearCase has a reputation for being complex to deploy and configure, despite strong customer support. GitHub is praised for its straightforward deployment process and extensive, community-driven support.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational ClearCase involves significant setup costs and ongoing maintenance expenses. GitHub provides various pricing tiers, including free options for small projects, and offers higher ROI through reduced setup time and comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,145 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

IBM Rational ClearCase

Ranking in Version Control

8th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational ClearCase is 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Yong Seok Kang

Technical Consultant at MTRiver Consulting

Useful for version control but UI is slow

I would recommend IBM Rational ClearCase based on customer requirements. Ultimately, the decision should be based on individual circumstances and budget considerations. Some organizations have transitioned away from the tool due to its slow performance and high costs, opting for more powerful systems. I rate it a six out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've found the technical support to be very helpful."

"We use GitHub as a repository."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"The solution is scalable."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

More GitHub pros

"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."

"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."

"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

Cons

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

More GitHub cons

"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."

"The protection needs to be improved."

"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive."

"This is a very expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

29%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Rational ClearCase?

The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational ClearCase?

IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ClearCase?

The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Git vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 31% of the time

Bitbucket vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 7% of the time

Endevor vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Rational ClearCase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2024

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

November 2024

Download IBM Rational ClearCase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rational ClearCase

Learn More

GitHub

IBM

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Atos SE, FEI, STM

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

December 2024

Free Report: GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.