GitHub vs OfficeSuite comparison

"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"We were able to route calls to mobile devices as well as hard phones."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

"The merging features can be improved."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code."

"The mobile app, desktop app, and hardware was outdated and clumsily integrated."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"Their pricing and "automatic contracts" are abhorrent."