GitHub vs OfficeSuite comparison

"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."

"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

"I find GitHub's pull request strategies and GitHub Actions to be very valuable."

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"We were able to route calls to mobile devices as well as hard phones."

"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."

"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."

"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"The mobile app, desktop app, and hardware was outdated and clumsily integrated."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"Their pricing and "automatic contracts" are abhorrent."