GitLab vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

GitLab and JFrog are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. GitLab is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while JFrog is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. GitLab holds a 12.0% mindshare in DSO, compared to JFrog’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 82 GitLab reviews

730 Views
637 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

7 Views
4 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

GitLab and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform are competitors in the DevOps landscape. GitLab often has the upper hand due to its comprehensive CI/CD and cost-effectiveness, while JFrog attracts attention for its superior artifact management.

Features: GitLab is recognized for its built-in CI/CD pipeline, project management tools, and collaboration features that enhance the efficiency of DevOps processes. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is notable for its artifact management capabilities, binary lifecycle management, and robust integration with multiple development tools. The distinction lies in GitLab's broader functionality compared to JFrog's specialized approach in managing artifacts and binaries.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab stands out with its user-friendly deployment, offering clear documentation and effective support that smoothens the deployment process. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, on the other hand, requires more technical expertise for full integration, making its deployment potentially more challenging. Nevertheless, it is supported by detailed and complex documentation.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is considered more affordable with attractive ROI through its integrated DevOps tools which are generally economical. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, while having higher initial costs, brings significant value with its advanced artifact management, which can be advantageous for large environments that benefit from its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,475 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in DevSecOps

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd)

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in DevSecOps

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Supply Chain Security (16th), AWS Marketplace (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of GitLab is 12.0%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."

"It is scalable."

"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools."

"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."

"I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus."

"GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure."

"It is very flexible and easy because you can store data on cloud."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

More GitLab pros

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see GitLab expand its integration capabilities to include platforms like DigitalOcean, which developers widely use for cloud infrastructure. Enhancing CI/CD automation features specifically tailored for DigitalOcean would be beneficial."

"I would like to see AI support in GitLab."

"The initial setup was quite challenging because it takes some time to understand how to pull out or push the code."

"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."

"You need to have a good knowledge of the product in order to use it."

"I rate the support from GitLab a four out of five."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."

More GitLab cons

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"The solution is free."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,475 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Certain features in Jira are not available in GitLab, such as the functionality to have weights at the milestone and epic levels. Hopefully, these features will be resolved with work items in GitLa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

Overall, the solution has been a great asset to our team. I advise investing time in the initial setup and training to leverage its capabilities fully. Ensure you clearly understand your needs and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts. Licensing options are flexible, but ensure you understand the terms and any additional costs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 28% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

April 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Marketplace

April 2025

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

No data available

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

April 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,475 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.