GitLab vs Octopus Deploy comparison

"A user friendly solution."

"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."

"We're only using the basic features of GitLab and haven't used any advanced features. The solution works fine, so that's what we like about GitLab. We're party using GitHub and GitLab. We have a GitHub server, while we use GitLab locally or only within our team, and it works okay. We don't have any significant problems with the solution. We also found the straightforward setup, stability, and scalability of GitLab valuable."

"The best thing is that as the developers work on separate tasks, all of the code goes there and the other team members don't have to wait on each other to finish."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"Deployment is valuable. It deploys well."

"The UI is very intuitive."

"The rollback feature has been most valuable. We can write scripts from scratch. Octopus maintains an independent package for every deployment."

"I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors."

"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"You need to have a good knowledge of the product in order to use it."

"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

"We'd always like to see better pricing on the product."

"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating."

"You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity."

"This solution could be improved by making it easier to divide variables in YAML file or JSON files."

"There could be scope for more integration with other platforms."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"We are using the open-source version."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"I don't know the exact cost, but it's not exorbitant. It may be a couple of thousand dollars a year or something like that. I'm not sure, but it's reasonable. We get value for money out of it."