GitLab and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform compete in the realm of DevOps and IT automation solutions. Based on feature comparisons, GitLab stands out for its CI/CD and repository management capabilities, while Ansible is favored for its simplicity and maintenance in hybrid environments.
Features: GitLab offers efficient CI/CD pipeline management, comprehensive repository control, and superior integration capabilities. Ansible is notable for its agentless architecture, ease of configuration in YAML, and strong automation capabilities, particularly in hybrid environments.
Room for Improvement:Ansible could benefit from enhanced speed when managing large server numbers, better orchestration capabilities, and richer documentation. GitLab needs to improve cloud service integration, especially with AWS, strengthen its project management tools, and expand its repository management to support larger files.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Ansible is versatile across various cloud environments, supported by a strong community and minimal formal technical support. GitLab is generally used in public cloud settings, with a mix of free and paid support options; however, cost is a concern for some users at premium tiers.
Pricing and ROI:Ansible's open-source nature ensures affordability and a solid ROI through efficiency savings. Its Tower pricing is higher, but often justified by its automation benefits. GitLab's premium tiers are costly but valued for their extensive features, with the community edition being economically accessible.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
Ansible can face scalability issues, such as limitations when trying to scale up infrastructure.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features.
The UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
More library support for microservices architecture and Kubernetes would be helpful.
More detailed dashboards would be beneficial because there is a lack of dashboards on Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The pricing is high, and since I'm not using all functionalities, it would be better if the price depended on the functionalities used.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The feature I appreciate the most about GitLab is its ease of use and compatibility, which allows for straightforward building and deployment processes.
The automation capabilities streamline deployment processes, providing reliability and reducing manual intervention and errors.
It makes it simple to develop Ansible playbooks and roles, which aids in simplifying my daily administrative tasks.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a powerful network automation solution that allows organizations to handle every aspect of their application launch process within a single product. It enables users to share their automations so that teams within an organization can collaborate on various projects with ease. Ansible Automation Platform is designed to be used by all employees involved in the network automation process.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform include:
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Features
Reviews from Real Users
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its automation manager and its comprehensive centralized GUI-based management interface.
MD J., a solution architect at STBL, says, “The automation manager is very good and makes things easier for customers with multi-cloud platforms.”
Aankit G., a Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS, writes, “We like the GUI-based interface for the tower. Before, we only had a command-line interface to run all the Ansible tasks. Now, the Ansible tower provides the complete GUI functionality to run, manage, and create the templates and the Ansible jobs. This includes the code and YAML file we can create. The GUI interface is the added advantage of this solution, including some integration with the different plugins.”
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
