Gluu Flex vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

Gluu Inc and IBM are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Gluu Inc is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. Gluu Inc holds a 1.0% mindshare in IAMS, compared to IBM’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gluu Inc users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Gluu Flex

Read 2 Gluu Flex reviews

207 Views
168 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 7 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

706 Views
476 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gluu Flex

IBM Security Verify Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

IBM Security Verify Access and Gluu Flex address identity and access management needs. IBM Security Verify Access typically dominates enterprise environments due to a comprehensive feature set, as seen when comparing the two in enterprise environments. Gluu Flex is preferred for its adaptability and customization in diverse settings, giving it an edge in instances where flexibility is key.

Features: IBM Security Verify Access offers robust security protocols, extensive integration capabilities, and strong compliance support, making it ideal for large enterprises with complex security needs. Gluu Flex values customization, providing a flexible architecture that meets a variety of organizational requirements while maintaining security and integration functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Verify Access features a structured deployment model with comprehensive documentation and support services beneficial to large organizations. Gluu Flex offers a more adaptable deployment process that allows for greater customization but may require more in-house expertise and an active approach. IBM stands out for its structured support, while Gluu Flex requires more technical engagement.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Verify Access requires a higher initial investment with a structured ROI model appropriate for organizations aiming at leveraging long-term security benefits. Gluu Flex typically involves a lower starting cost, appealing to those prioritizing immediate and flexible cost-effectiveness, with IBM's setup costs potentially offering substantial long-term benefits. Gluu Flex's pricing is more accessible and adaptable, promising a quicker ROI for those seeking cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gluu Flex

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

20th

Ranking in Access Management

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

19th

Ranking in Access Management

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (14th), Identity Management (IM) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Gluu Flex is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

EtienneVenter

Owner at Process2product

Facilitates improvement through feedback collection, quizzes, and event data generation

Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system. Gluu filters and displays relevant information based on the user's role in the processes. Users can set it up to view as a viewer, worker, manager, or controller of the area. The front end offers different views but provides an easy dashboard for employees. On the dashboard, users can configure it to show tasks, related work instructions, and connected processes. It's very user-friendly, allowing end-users to understand their tasks and processes without needing in-depth knowledge.

Read full review

AsifIqbal

Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has good scalability and is stable with no glitches; has a multi-factor authentication feature

What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system."

"Most of the features are related to banking within this particular IT industry. Security and the market are also important features."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

Cons

"The tool integrates AI into the process modeling aspect. I believe this addition will significantly enhance usability. Additionally, it might be beneficial to have the capability to import content from other tools into this platform. Our platform follows its business process modeling notation standard, which differs from BPM. It uses a simpler notation, making it easier. The ability to import content from other tools could accommodate users accustomed to different standards."

"I would like to see features around federation, authentication, authorization, and AI APIs with a ChatGPT interface."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheaper compared to typical German products. I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten."

"The price is reasonable."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

35%

Government

13%

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

23%

Insurance Company

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gluu?

Gluu has a mobile app catering to field workers. Normal workers use the web app, a complete cloud-based solution. They log in on any device and access the system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gluu?

The tool is cheaper compared to typical German products. I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten. The cost depends on the model you choose. If you go bigger, like a thousand or more users, t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gluu?

The tool integrates AI into the process modeling aspect. I believe this addition will significantly enhance usability. Additionally, it might be beneficial to have the capability to import content ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Gluu Flex

Compared 37% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Gluu Flex

Compared 35% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Gluu Flex

Compared 27% of the time

More Gluu Flex Competitors

Oracle Access Manager vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 23% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

ForgeRock vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

April 2025

Download Gluu Flex product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

April 2025

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

Gluu Flex is an enterprise-level tool designed for identity and access management, offering advanced security and flexibility tailored to meet demanding IT environments. Focusing on high-performance capabilities, Gluu Flex caters to complex authentication needs for businesses.

This platform provides scalable solutions for businesses looking to integrate efficient identity management. It is designed with adaptability in mind, enabling seamless integration with existing infrastructure. The core features support a robust authentication framework that ensures secure user access across IT systems. With the flexibility to handle complex configurations and provide comprehensive support, it meets the modern demands businesses face.

What are the key features of Gluu Flex?

Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Advanced Authentication: Supports multifactor authentication for enhanced security.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT environments.
Comprehensive Support: Offers thorough documentation and responsive customer service.

What benefits should you expect from using Gluu Flex?

Enhanced Security: Delivers robust protection against unauthorized access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces overhead by streamlining identity management processes.
Operational Agility: Provides faster response to evolving IT requirements.
Increased Compliance: Ensures alignment with regulatory standards for data protection.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Gluu Flex is implemented to safeguard sensitive information and streamline access management. Its ability to offer bespoke security solutions makes it a preferred choice for sectors with stringent compliance needs, allowing businesses to achieve greater efficiency and control.

Gluu Inc

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Sample Customers

Dubai Municipality

POST Luxembourg

Buyer's Guide

Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access

March 2025

Free Report: Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Find out what your peers are saying about Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gluu Flex vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.