Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Google holds a 8.2% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Microsoft’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Read 8 Google Cloud Storage Nearline reviews
  • 1,716 Views
  • 1,524 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Read 45 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews
  • 4,234 Views
  • 3,484 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage Nearline and Microsoft Azure File Storage both offer cloud storage solutions with distinct advantages. Google Cloud Storage Nearline seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness for less frequently accessed data, while Microsoft Azure File Storage excels in versatility and integration with Windows environments.

Features: Google Cloud Storage Nearline provides cost-effective storage for infrequently accessed data, seamless integration with Google Cloud services, and robust data reliability. Microsoft Azure File Storage offers strong file sharing capabilities, SMB access, and easy integration with Windows environments.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage Nearline could improve its retrieval times, offer more comprehensive documentation, and enhance customer support. Microsoft Azure File Storage could better support larger-scale deployments, reduce latency periods, and simplify deployment in non-Windows environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers straightforward deployment processes but needs better customer service support. Microsoft Azure File Storage provides smooth deployment within Windows-based systems and reliable customer service, although it faces complexities in non-Windows environments.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage Nearline has a highly competitive pricing model, making it ideal for cold data storage. Microsoft Azure File Storage, priced higher, delivers better ROI through its array of features and integration capabilities, justifying the cost for organizations needing these functionalities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.1
Google Cloud Storage Nearline requires pricing, GUI, security, SEIM integration, documentation, search, and flexible pricing improvements with customizable UI themes.
Sentiment score
4.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage needs enhanced ease of use, pricing clarity, integrations, security features, and improved user experience.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers exceptional scalability and flexibility, seamlessly handling various user numbers and integrating well into projects.
Sentiment score
8.3
Microsoft Azure File Storage is scalable and adaptable for various organization sizes, efficiently handling user needs with dynamic cloud capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Google Cloud Storage Nearline costs vary widely, considered both expensive and affordable, with flexible storage classes and pay-per-use fees.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing is variable and less transparent, with potentially higher costs and various additional fees for support and licensing.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Google Cloud Storage Nearline is notably stable with a 99.99% SLA, minimal issues, and highly reliable performance in South America.
No sentiment score available
Microsoft Azure File Storage is praised for stability and reliability, with users reporting minimal issues and high stability ratings.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
The service offers secure, scalable, and user-friendly API integration with reliable monitoring, monthly updates, and convenient data access.
Sentiment score
8.5
Microsoft Azure File Storage offers flexible, secure, and cost-effective file storage with high availability, seamless integration, and convenient file transfer capabilities.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.2
Microsoft Azure File Storage support varies in responsiveness and quality, influenced by customer status, location, and type of partnership.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is 8.2%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 12.9%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Darasimi Ajewole - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides APIs for everything and has good protection through encryption
As a lead developer, I struggled with the documentation for GCP. This could be improved by being made more clear. Also, the interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved, together with improved search and filter options. For the next release, I would like to see the solution behave more like a regular file-based system. Google Cloud Storage depends on OS, or it's supposed to be on Google Drive or another storage service. Google Storage files are sometimes very different. The solution should be expanded to be like a file-based system so that you can build a fast tool that stores files in Google Drive.
Read full review
Pmurki@Micron.Com Praveen - PeerSpot reviewer
Setup takes minimal efforts and good product to keep files for our ETL process
We use it for ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. We get files from different tools related to our micro-processing, copy them into Azure File Storage, and then consume them for parsing and loading It's good overall. We just use Azure File Storage as a way to keep files for our ETL process.…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage Nearline?
The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?
The pricing of the different storage classes is hard to compare. The higher the zone, the higher the price. The advantage is that you can access the data frequently, and the speed of the response i...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage Nearline?
The UI could be a little bit more effective. Now, the UI is just a white background, but it's really helpful if there are options to change the theme. I prefer that.
See all answers
Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The product is a reliable cloud solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
As for the current licensing and payment structure, it's almost pay-as-you-go. Monthly is okay. But maybe we'll get a better price if we have a long-term contract and pay monthly.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Compared 98% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline Logo
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Compared 2% of the time
More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Competitors
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 49% of the time
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 17% of the time
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 7% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 7% of the time
More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage Nearline
November 2024
Google Cloud Storage Nearline reportDownload Google Cloud Storage Nearline product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage
November 2024
Microsoft Azure File Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure File Storage product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Azure File Storage
 

Learn More

Google
Microsoft
 

Overview

A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

  • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
  • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
  • Integrate modern applications with File storage
  • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Talon, Camden
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
October 2024
Free Report: Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.