Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #16. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 77 Google Cloud Storage reviews

2,473 Views
1,637 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews

684 Views
384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud offer competing cloud storage solutions. Users find Google Cloud Storage more satisfying in terms of cost and support, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service stands out for its advanced features, making it appear worth the higher price according to user reviews.

Features: Google Cloud Storage is appreciated for its high reliability and integration capabilities. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is valued for its performance and data management features. Hence, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service has an edge due to its specialized capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Google Cloud Storage could improve its performance consistency and provide more robust security features. For NetApp Cloud Volumes Service, the main areas of improvement include better documentation and enhanced simplicity in operations. Google Cloud Storage shows weakness in performance, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes Service could benefit from operational simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is noted for its straightforward deployment but has mixed reviews concerning customer service. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is praised for its seamless deployment process and superior customer service. Thus, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is regarded as better in both deployment and customer service aspects.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is generally considered more cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is viewed as more expensive but justifies the higher cost with better ROI due to its advanced features. Google Cloud Storage is preferable for budget-conscious users, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is favored for its higher ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Cloud Storage

2nd

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Cloud Storage

16th

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

19th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (14th)

Featured Reviews

Naresh Kumar

Founder & Director at Hiindsight Group

Offers great reliability to users

Protection is an area in the product where improvements are required. If big companies want to use the tool for protection purposes, like security, which is a big thing people are looking for nowadays. Sometimes, the tool's user interface automatically puts all the files in a different place, making it a bit difficult to go deep and figure out in which folder a file is present. I need to search for a file and drill down to be able to find it. There are a few bugs in the tool, as with all content management tools, since the solution is usually used to deal with huge amounts of content. If the flow of the documents is huge, the tool might get slow for the end users, or when the data is being migrated or imported into the tools.

Read full review

Colin Constable

Co-Founder at Atsign

Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time

NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy to use object storage solution that's scalable and stable. Its technical support team is customer-friendly."

"The solution's most valuable features are availability, feasibility, and reachability."

"The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information."

"On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."

"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are the ease of use and I can share files with my colleagues."

"The most valuable features are stability and ease of use."

"Google Cloud Storage is highly reliable."

"You do not need to install anything."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."

"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."

"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

Cons

"The solution should improve its security and accountability."

"I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics."

"When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution."

"The price of Azure products is high. In my opinion, the prices of Google solutions should be lowered for businesses."

"I would like the storage to be less expensive."

"The solution only allows so much space for free."

"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."

"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."

"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."

"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license needed to use Google Cloud Storage at our university."

"I pay monthly for Google Cloud Storage. It could be cheaper, but for now, it's okay."

"I pay for a monthly subscription."

"The solution is free unless you want to increase the GB data allowance. There is a cost if you want to increase the size of storage space which is expensive."

"There are no licensing fees."

"The product is subscription-based. When you pay, you will get more storage."

"Its price is fine."

"The product is not expensive. If you are in India, the tool charges around six to eight USD if I consider the discounts offered by the product."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

73%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

61%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability. We use it for backup, so the storage that is not used often is affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

So far, when it comes to security, it meets our needs and requirements, so I have nothing to say about improvements to their services. I do not find any areas needing improvement currently.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 23% of the time

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 9% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 40% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 38% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

December 2024

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

December 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP

Learn More

Google

NetApp

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

NetApp^® Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud is a fully managed or self-managed file service that is integrated into Google Cloud with the multiprotocol support, performance, and availability required to run business-critical applications. It is designed to provide massively parallel shared access to thousands of Google Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine instances, enabling your applications to achieve high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with consistent low latencies.

Use cases. Customers can use the service to migrate existing enterprise applications to Google Cloud. Other use cases include hybrid deployments, multicloud mobility, big data analytics, web serving and content management, application development and testing, media and entertainment workflows, database backups, container storage, and more.

Features. Multiple performance tiers, standard file interfaces, advanced data management, metered service, fully managed service, native service experience, integrated support, and integrated billing.

For more information:

NetApp: https://cloud.netapp.com/cloud-volumes-service-for-gcp

Google: https://cloud.google.com/netapp

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

November 2024

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.