Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #16. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.
Google Cloud Storage
Read 76 Google Cloud Storage reviews
  • 2,609 Views
  • 1,744 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews
  • 734 Views
  • 424 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud offer competing cloud storage solutions. Users find Google Cloud Storage more satisfying in terms of cost and support, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service stands out for its advanced features, making it appear worth the higher price according to user reviews.

Features: Google Cloud Storage is appreciated for its high reliability and integration capabilities. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is valued for its performance and data management features. Hence, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service has an edge due to its specialized capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Google Cloud Storage could improve its performance consistency and provide more robust security features. For NetApp Cloud Volumes Service, the main areas of improvement include better documentation and enhanced simplicity in operations. Google Cloud Storage shows weakness in performance, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes Service could benefit from operational simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is noted for its straightforward deployment but has mixed reviews concerning customer service. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is praised for its seamless deployment process and superior customer service. Thus, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is regarded as better in both deployment and customer service aspects.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is generally considered more cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is viewed as more expensive but justifies the higher cost with better ROI due to its advanced features. Google Cloud Storage is preferable for budget-conscious users, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is favored for its higher ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Most users manage independently, but those using Google Cloud Storage support find it professional and efficient, despite occasional delays.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.2
Google Cloud Storage needs enhancements in speed, user experience, security, integration, and flexible storage plans with lower costs.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud needs better documentation, transparent pricing, high-availability support, smoother integration, and consistent performance.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Google Cloud Storage provides scalable and flexible storage solutions, efficiently handling varying workloads and user numbers, though cost concerns exist.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is praised for efficient, flexible scaling and consistent performance with dynamic storage needs.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Google Cloud Storage's pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, offers free tiers, and appeals with discounts in select regions.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides flexible, predictable pricing with various performance tiers to optimize business spending.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Google Cloud Storage is highly stable and reliable, with users praising its consistent performance and smooth integration across locations.
No sentiment score available
Users find NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud stable, reliable, highly available, and capable of handling substantial workloads without issue.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.6
Google Cloud Storage is highly valued for scalability, ease of use, security, and seamless integration with diverse business needs.
No sentiment score available
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud excels in management, integration, performance, data protection, scalability, pricing, and support.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage
Ranking in Cloud Storage
2nd
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Ranking in Cloud Storage
16th
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
19th
Average Rating
9.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (14th)
 

Featured Reviews

Akos Szirmai - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers accessibility from various devices and easy to setup
I never intended to use Google Storage. It was just a backup or auxiliary service to my Gmail account. If someone wants to use it, they probably can use it. I am not sure about the corporate environment. But at a personal level, Google Storage supports a lot of functions of the whole Google package, from the calendar, mail, photos, news, and so on. So, anyone who is using this software is definitely using Google Storage in some way. It is about the core usage. So, if someone is looking for a cloud storage solution, I would suggest using it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Read full review
CC
Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time
NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
72%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
Educational Organization
60%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?
It is flexible and simple to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?
The pricing for cloud services, including Google, remains challenging in the Philippines, especially for SMEs. These businesses often find cloud solutions more expensive compared to on-premises opt...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?
The initial setup appears to be the hardest part, although once familiar with it, the process becomes easier. Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than o...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 23% of the time
AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 19% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Logo
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage
Compared 8% of the time
More Google Cloud Storage Competitors
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Logo
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
Compared 43% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
Compared 38% of the time
More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage
November 2024
Google Cloud Storage reportDownload Google Cloud Storage product report
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
November 2024
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reportDownload NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
 

Learn More

Google
NetApp
 

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

NetApp® Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud is a fully managed or self-managed file service that is integrated into Google Cloud with the multiprotocol support, performance, and availability required to run business-critical applications. It is designed to provide massively parallel shared access to thousands of Google Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine instances, enabling your applications to achieve high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with consistent low latencies.

Use cases. Customers can use the service to migrate existing enterprise applications to Google Cloud. Other use cases include hybrid deployments, multicloud mobility, big data analytics, web serving and content management, application development and testing, media and entertainment workflows, database backups, container storage, and more.

Features. Multiple performance tiers, standard file interfaces, advanced data management, metered service, fully managed service, native service experience, integrated support, and integrated billing.

For more information:

NetApp: https://cloud.netapp.com/cloud-volumes-service-for-gcp

Google: https://cloud.google.com/netapp

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
November 2024
Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.