Heroku and Pantheon are in the cloud platform category for developer and website management needs. Heroku is favored for its support and pricing, while Pantheon's features justify its cost for many tech buyers.
Features: Heroku provides a robust environment for diverse app deployments with a variety of add-ons. Pantheon focuses on website hosting with optimized workflows for WordPress and Drupal. Heroku is versatile in app deployments, while Pantheon specializes in web hosting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku has a flexible deployment model with strong documentation and support for smooth app launches. Pantheon's deployment system includes tools tailored for web projects, such as automated updates and version control. Pantheon enhances deployment efficiency with web-centric tools.
Pricing and ROI: Heroku offers a lower initial setup cost and a pricing model that scales well, providing stable ROI. Pantheon may require a higher initial investment but offers significant ROI through specialized features for high-traffic websites. Heroku focuses on scalability, while Pantheon offers optimized web-centric features.
Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.
Pantheon is the world’s fastest hosting for Drupal and WordPress. It comes down to our super-efficient container-based platform. Multiple independent benchmarks have compared Pantheon with other providers, and we consistently come out on top.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.