Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024
Pure Storage FlashBlade and Hitachi Content Platform compete in the storage solutions category. FlashBlade appears to have the upper hand due to its high performance and simplicity, while Hitachi offers extensive integration and archiving capabilities.
Features: Pure Storage FlashBlade is recognized for its exceptional throughput, speed, and seamless integration. It offers fast data replication and is noted for its user-friendly simplicity. Hitachi Content Platform excels in data archiving, management, and robust integration with existing systems. It provides strong stability and compliance features suitable for diverse environments.
Room for Improvement: Pure Storage FlashBlade requires improvements in public cloud integration, deduplication, and pricing, with users desiring enhanced enterprise-feature sets. Hitachi Content Platform needs simpler migration processes, better user interfaces, and stronger cloud integration. Users have also highlighted issues with pricing and the efficiency of technical support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pure Storage FlashBlade is primarily deployed on-premises and is praised for its easy deployment process. However, some users noted a decline in support quality as the company grows. Hitachi Content Platform offers on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud deployments with generally high-rated technical support, despite occasional delays. FlashBlade's deployment is considered simpler, while Hitachi provides broader deployment options.
Pricing and ROI: Pure Storage FlashBlade is viewed as expensive but is justified by its high performance and significant ROI through time savings. Hitachi Content Platform offers competitive pricing among Western vendors with varied ROI, acknowledged for reducing total cost of ownership. FlashBlade is noted for streamlined management, whereas Hitachi provides cost-effective solutions with strong capabilities.
