IBM App Connect vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

The compared IBM and WSO2 solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #13 in CDI , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 4.8% mindshare in the category. WSO2 is ranked #29 in DI , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

IBM App Connect

Read 25 IBM App Connect reviews

2,336 Views
1,308 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,861 Views
763 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: May 2023).

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

May 2023

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (13th)

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (29th), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM App Connect is designed for Cloud Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 4.8%, up 3.7% compared to last year.
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 0.8% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM App Connect	4.8%
AWS Glue	15.3%
AWS Database Migration Service	11.9%
Other	68.0%

Cloud Data Integration

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	0.8%
Informatica PowerCenter	6.3%
SSIS	5.9%
Other	87.0%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Transforms data efficiently and navigates licensing challenges with ease

The transition between version 12 and version 13 presents some challenges. While version 12 had approximately 10 features, version 13 includes around 200 features with cloud platform compatibility. The learning curve for developers moving from version 12 to 13 could be smoother. When using new components, better context explanations would be beneficial. In version 13, accessing new features requires connecting through a web browser, which can be challenging to understand. The explanation of new features could be more user-friendly.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would say that the most valuable feature is the array of connectors and integration tools."

"One of the most beneficial features is the ability to handle multiple communication technologies, like integrating Kafka flows, which is helpful as other teams heavily use it. Regarding error handling, I initially wrote most of the handling myself. While built-in features for error handling are built-in, it largely depends on the developer. We use a custom solution that catches all exceptions, logs them in a database, and replays them as needed. It has been effective for us for over twenty years."

"We use IBM App Connect for the integration between the applications."

"Very scalable, flexible, and user-friendly."

"When using IBM stacks, IBM App Connect is suitable and integrates well with other IBM products like WebSphere."

"App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."

"The solution is very fast-paced when it comes to making things right. We can quickly download what we need if we need any app migrations for our software business. We can download it plenty of times when we need to use it. It gives us very high speed for delivering any development."

"It can handle API conversions with mapping and transformation rules, simplifying the development process."

More IBM App Connect pros

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"The stability is excellent."

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Plugins for the repositories are difficult to find."

"The product should improve its support."

"The addition of string functionality would be a benefit, particularly in the ESQL space that IBM already uses internally."

"In the next release, I would like to get some quality connectors."

"The setup time for App Connect could be improved."

"They reply in one or two hours at most, but they could be better."

"It is not easy to deploy. It requires someone with a high level of knowledge in the solution to deploy it, not just anyone can do it."

"When we do a version upgrade of the system, the platform is kind of complicated."

More IBM App Connect cons

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"The price could be better."

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"It is a low-cost solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

Configuration time varies by implementation. For insurance companies with simple JDBC connections, the process is straightforward. However, companies requiring multiple configurations for ODBC, JDB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

I am a developer specializing in IBM App Connect. We have a customer interested in comparing ESB tools, such as webMethods, which was previously owned by Software AG company before IBM acquired the...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...

See all answers

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Compared 32% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 11% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM App Connect

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

OpenESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 5% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect

September 2025

Download IBM App Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

August 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

No data available

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

West

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

May 2023

Free Report: IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM App Connect vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.