Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere DataStage
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (7th)
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Message Queue (MQ) Software (3rd), Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Workload Automation (9th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Murali B - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 28, 2024
Facilitated our peak data integration projects, offers good GUI and availability of connectors is strong
DataStage facilitated our peak data integration projects. For example, big data integrations have happened, particularly when we worked with BigQuery files... that integration server. DataStage parallel processing capabilities have improved data tasks. When I worked with DataStage, it could handle around two terabytes of data. We have other appliances as well, but we're processing data concurrently. It was good. My team supported it well, and everything worked fine. The GUI was good. Compared to Cloud Pak for Data, we have some enhanced connectors in the standard InfoSphere DataStage version. That standard version is really good; it's easy to use. When we want to find out the absolute quality of data, the governance features really helped. For example, when we tried to identify discrepancies between systems, it worked well.
Dimitrios Karachalios - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 22, 2024
Useful for asynchronous messaging, but it lacks features, and the storage is limited
The solution is used in many projects. I'm an IT consultant. I use the tool when there's a need for asynchronous messaging It is a nice product to expand the functionality of our event-driven architecture. The use of ACK is valuable. I can leave a message through the code and take advantage of…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration for data warehousing."
"When we have needed help from the IBM team, they were helpful. Our company is a premium partner so we get fast responses."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to incorporate very complex business rules in Data Stage."
"The solution has improved the time it takes to perform tasks related to batch applications."
"The product is a stable and powerful data management solution that can run in parallel mode for enhanced speed."
"It is quite useful and powerful."
"We like the flexibility of modeling."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
 

Cons

"There could be more customization options for the product."
"Currently lacking virtualization ability."
"Its documentation is not up to the mark. While building APIs, we had a lot of problems trying to get around it because it is not very user-friendly. We tried to get hold of API documentation, but the documentation is not very well thought out. It should be more structured and elaborate. In terms of additional features, I would like to see good reporting on performance and performance-tuning recommendations that can be based on AI. I would also like to see better data profiling information being reported on InfoSphere."
"The interface needs work to be more user-friendly."
"The solution should be more user-friendly."
"Improvements for DataStage could include better integration with modern data sources like cloud solutions and documents, along with enhancing its capability to handle non-structured data."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"Working with some of the big data components is good, but I can see improvements are needed."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"It should give better control over account management."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Information on monitoring could be improved."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive but on the higher side of the pricing scale."
"Small and medium-sized companies cannot afford to pay for this solution."
"The solution is cheap."
"The product is expensive."
"It's quite expensive."
"The cost is too high."
"It is quite expensive."
"I have no information on the exact pricing for IBM InfoSphere DataStage because the solution is usually procured by the clients my company works with, though the pricing is higher compared to other solutions, so many clients choose to go with a different solution rather than IBM InfoSphere DataStage."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."
"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."
"The licensing is core-based. My customers tell me that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced."
"The tool's pricing is cheaper than other RPAs' since it is execution-based. Other RPAs charge based on subscriptions."
"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."
"Licensing can be complex as is the case with most iPaaS/cloud offerings."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Educational Organization
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Would you upgrade to more premium versions of IBM InfoSphere DataStage?
My company currently uses the free version of the product, and we are definitely switching to a paid one. We needed a tool that can help us not only integrate our data but use it effectively. For ...
Is IBM InfoSphere DataStage more difficult to use compared to other tools in the field?
I think the tool may cause some difficulties if you have not used other data integration solutions before. I have worked at companies that used different tools for data integration, and they work ...
Do you rely on IBM Cloud Paks for your data? Have you utilized this product, or do you use IBM InfoSphere DataStage without it?
IBM Cloud Paks makes a big difference in your data integration. My company has been using it alongside IBM InfoSphere DataStage and while the main product is good on its own, this one truly expands...
What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?
I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?
This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dubai Statistics Center, Etisalat Egypt
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,634 professionals have used our research since 2012.