IBM Rational System Architect vs LeanIX comparison

IBM and SAP LeanIX are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. IBM is ranked #20, while SAP LeanIX is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.9% mindshare in AM, compared to SAP LeanIX’s 15.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SAP LeanIX users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational System Architect

Read 5 IBM Rational System Architect reviews

1,084 Views
602 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

LeanIX

Read 21 LeanIX reviews

6,813 Views
3,380 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM Rational System Architect

LeanIX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

IBM Rational System Architect and LeanIX are competitors in the enterprise architecture domain. While LeanIX stands out for its comprehensive feature set, IBM Rational System Architect offers notable advantages in pricing and support, presenting a clearer value proposition in these areas.

Features: IBM Rational System Architect is praised for its robust modeling capabilities, comprehensive integration with IBM tools, and its value in detailed architecture planning. LeanIX provides user-friendly collaboration, quick adaptability, and advanced features like cloud-based accessibility and streamlined data integration, making it superior for modern enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational System Architect could enhance its deployment agility and update its user interface for better usability. It's also crucial to improve integration options with non-IBM ecosystems. LeanIX could benefit from reducing its high initial investment cost, expanding customization options, and enhancing offline capabilities for environments with limited internet access.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LeanIX's cloud-native deployment offers quick setup and flexibility, with a strong focus on customer-centric support. In contrast, IBM Rational System Architect may involve a more complex deployment process, yet it benefits organizations with existing IBM ecosystems through its wide range of integration options and established support protocols.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational System Architect provides a cost-effective setup with favorable long-term ROI when used within IBM infrastructures, making it attractive for budget-conscious clients. LeanIX, while requiring a higher initial investment, justifies this with its scalability and advanced features, promising potentially higher ROI for dynamic organizations prioritizing operational agility.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational System Architect vs. LeanIX Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational System Architect vs. LeanIX

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational System Architect

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

20th

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LeanIX

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of IBM Rational System Architect is 1.9%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LeanIX is 15.9%, up from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

Entrprsarch67

Enterprise Architecture Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Modeling is useful, but many features need improvement and technical support is lacking

I find that almost every feature related to the models requires improvement. For example, I would like to see more trendy models, the look and feel of the models can be improved. This solution can be more user-friendly and easier to use, with better dashboards. The impact analysis feature is in need of heavy improvement. The is a standalone product that lacks integration with a business process automation engine. I would like to see the workflow improved, where it integrates seamlessly with the artifacts.

Read full review

NickGenoese

Consultant at Ngen Consulting

Streamlines the process of identifying apps nearing end-of-life or requiring retirement and facilitates informed decisions about app retention

When we input our inventory and components, it tells us which ones are nearing end-of-life, deprecated, or obsolete. It also categorizes them. We've added flags, essentially tags, to mark certain things as non-strategic technologies. Using LeanIX, we made conscious decisions about which technologies are strategic and which aren't. This allows us to generate reports highlighting applications written in non-strategic technologies, giving us a better picture of our inventory size and what needs to migrate to the cloud or our target technology. So, it's about understanding what we have, seeing how it aligns with our strategic direction, and then driving the movement towards that direction.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have seen ROI with this solution over the years that we have used it."

"The user interface is good. It's both clear and comprehensible. It's easy to work with."

"There are a lot of features I find valuable, but I think that the metamodel customization is one of the best features that the solution offers."

"The solution is pretty stable."

"LeanIX has good usability and stability. This SaaS is intuitive, easy to use, and comes with a nice reporting feature."

"The most valuable features are the clean user interface and the fact sheet feature in Application Portfolio Management. The tool integrates well with ServiceNow, which is the usual CMDB platform."

"My favorite feature of LeanIX is its ability to induct attribute-driven surveys."

"The most valuable feature would be application portfolio management, which is where they came from, but over time, they have got artificial intelligence. They built up a very good repository. If I identify a system by name, from historical information, oftentimes, they can tell me that this is deployed with this number of CPUs and they can give me a really good profile of the application for me to put it into a change management database with very little effort."

"My favorite feature of LeanIX is its ability to induct attribute-driven surveys."

"The most valuable features include the reporting capabilities and the LeanIX Academy's educational resources."

"I like the tool’s integration and maps."

"The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies."

More LeanIX pros

Cons

"This solution can be more user-friendly and easier to use, with better dashboards."

"There needs to be more information at the outset about how to use the solution and how to deploy it. The deployment process needs improvement."

"The solution needs to better integrate with other products, like Microsoft."

"The reverse engineering of the database is already there, but in the next release I would like to see some pilot supplied with the solution in order to address any database."

"Report generation could be more detailed. There are some shortcomings when creating reports. We can't create tag-based reports or go beyond basic technical reports."

"The solution’s API integration needs to improve. I would like to see a digital screen watch feature also in the solution."

"The whole integration architecture view of interfaces/data exchange could be improved."

"They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them."

"LeanIX should improve its support services."

"Does a poor job of being able to allocate detailed costings to components within the network."

"LeanIX experiences a lot of server timeouts. Nearly every transaction needs to be done twice due to these issues."

"Another area for improvement is that when you're starting to look into more advanced information, using the solution's APIs and its customizations, documentation for that specific aspect is not very good. There is not too much support built into the offering for that aspect, for a developer."

More LeanIX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is competitive and in line with other products."

"There is a sweet spot of where they need to be on pricing right now. They could go up a little bit in pricing, but it has to do with the cost savings, and it has to do with the practitioners using it. I use it where I get cost savings and I can justify it, but they probably have the ability to flex a 10% up channel on their sales on that. So, they could increase their settle price, not their offering price, when they sell. They can probably hold that up a little bit higher than it is because there are cost savings that we can drive from it."

"As the tool is cloud-based, its cost is more affordable."

"The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money."

"LeanIX uses application-based account licensing, where the cost is multiplied by the number of applications in the software implementation."

"It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications."

"The tool needs to include more flexible licensing options. We do not use the tool all the time. So pricing should be considered only when we use the tool."

"I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi @Cheryl Joseph Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...

See all answers

What do you like most about LeanIX?

The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LeanIX?

LeanIX is associated with high costs. It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications. The first pricing ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 67% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 12% of the time

erwin Data Modeler by Quest vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 12% of the time

ARIS BPA vs IBM Rational System Architect

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM Rational System Architect Competitors

ServiceNow vs LeanIX

Compared 22% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs LeanIX

Compared 15% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs LeanIX

Compared 9% of the time

iServer vs LeanIX

Compared 7% of the time

Ardoq vs LeanIX

Compared 6% of the time

More LeanIX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

December 2024

Download IBM Rational System Architect product report

Buyer's Guide

LeanIX

December 2024

Download LeanIX product report

Also Known As

Rational System Architect

No data available

Learn More

IBM

SAP LeanIX

Overview

IBM Rational System Architect is an enterprise architecture solution for visualizing, analyzing, and communicating enterprise architecture and business process analysis. This solution provides decision support, process optimization, and integration into solution delivery. Rational System Architect addresses all aspects of your organization's enterprise architecture, including modeling, publishing, analysis, and execution.

LeanIX delivers collaborative Enterprise Architecture designed for modern IT. Our open, data-driven architecture management model helps organizations adapt to the evolving demands of digital. From agile to multi-cloud and beyond, architecture teams using LeanIX have the power to strategically support the business and report 45% reduction in time to value delivery. More than 90,000 users across enterprises worldwide rely on LeanIX to manage their IT landscape, including adidas, Bosch, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

Sample Customers

Wuxi Lake Cloud, Nationwide, ETI, IDS Scheer

adidas, Bosch, Chico's, Haworth, Helvetia, KuKa, Osram, Telekom, TUI, Santander, Swarovski, Vaillant, 7Eleven, and Zalando.

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational System Architect vs. LeanIX

December 2024

Free Report: IBM Rational System Architect vs. LeanIX

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational System Architect vs. LeanIX and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational System Architect vs. LeanIX report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.