Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs Oracle Service Bus comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5. IBM holds a 4.0% mindshare in E, compared to Oracle’s 11.8% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Read 13 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews
  • 1,005 Views
  • 837 Comparison Views
84% willing to recommend
Oracle Service Bus
Read 30 Oracle Service Bus reviews
  • 2,801 Views
  • 1,829 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

Oracle Service Bus and IBM WebSphere Message Broker compete in the integration and middleware domain. Oracle Service Bus seems to have the upper hand due to its simplicity and versatility in various integration scenarios, despite similar support challenges.

Features: Oracle Service Bus is light, simple to learn, and excels in integration via robust adapters and connectors. It offers strong routing, aggregation, and stability. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is valued for integration capabilities with large-scale transactions and legacy systems, providing reliable and secure data integration and processing.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Service Bus faces challenges with RESTful service compatibility, scalability, and a complex licensing model. It also needs more cloud-based adapter offerings. IBM WebSphere Message Broker should reduce its complexity, enhance decoupling from IBM MQ, and address high costs and GUI performance issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OSB offers flexibility across environments with hybrid and public clouds, although users experience slow support response times and licensing difficulties. IBM WebSphere Message Broker primarily supports on-premises deployment with similar support issues and needs better response times and resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: OSB is considered expensive but offers enterprise agreements with cost savings, although its pricing model is challenging. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is also high-cost, often deterring potential customers. Both products have indeterminate ROI but are noted for their reliability in scaling and operations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle Service Bus Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle Service Bus
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (15th)
Oracle Service Bus
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Message Broker is 4.0%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Service Bus is 11.8%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

BrajendraKumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers large-sized business information processing with a time-saving setup and impressive stability
I primarily use two previews of the product for Dev and two for QA as part of the production process. Whatever tools our company is using, the cost of a license in IBM WebSphere Message Broker is about 80% of all these software or tools. The message routing capabilities satisfy workflow efficiency. The product supports message formats of XML, JSON, and SSID, which are around 24 KB to 50 KB in size. The solution supports communication protocols like STTP and TCP. Features like DataGraph need to be introduced in IBM WebSphere Message Broker. Some of the clients of our organization are using an outdated version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker for which the vendor doesn't provide direct support anymore. For the aforementioned version, our company professionals can solve the queries on their own without seeking support from IBM. During the installation of a prior version of IBM WebSphere Message Broker, sometimes I have to configure the failovers through the cluster, where issues arise, and I often seek help from the support team. The solution is being used by some medicine companies in our organization that receive sales orders from the EDR or JDE. I would not recommend the product to others as its becoming obsolete and they can rather choose a middleware solution from Amazon or Azure. But I would overall rate the product a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Radhey Rajput - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows seamless integration and connectivity with different types of systems
I would suggest using this solution. Oracle Service Bus is very good. Any organization can use it. So it's very robust and scalable, and its security features are very good. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because there are some loopholes in service and support. Sometimes, when we have issues and go to Oracle support, they will not give us solutions. Instead, they will ask for so many log files and emails. The product is good, but the support is not.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has good integration."
"The transactions and message queuing are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The documentation, performance, stability and scalability of the tool are valuable."
"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format."
"Message Broker is valuable because most of the applications are using MQ. Even in my current engagement, the few applications which I audit to onboard the bank are using MQ."
"It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy."
"It's reliable for our day-to-day operations, ensuring fast and secure data integration across different systems."
"Performance-wise, this solution is really good."
More IBM WebSphere Message Broker pros
"It has improved the efficiency of development."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"API management and defining varying protocols are the most valuable features"
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
More Oracle Service Bus pros
 

Cons

"As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordingly."
"Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved."
"It is currently a weighty product."
"The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight."
"The installation configuration is quite difficult."
"The product's features are not being upgraded or enhanced by the vendor"
"The solution can add container engines such as docker."
"Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."
More IBM WebSphere Message Broker cons
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"The initial setup is likely complex for many organizations."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
More Oracle Service Bus cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost of IBM WebSphere Message Broker needs to be reduced"
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"This product is more expensive than competing products."
"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."
"I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."
"IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time."
"The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."
"This is a very expensive product and the price varies depending on factors such as the number of processors and the number of users. Our licensing fees are approximately $300,000."
"We have an unlimited yearly license."
"I'm not aware of how much Oracle Service Bus costs."
"The price of this solution is better than the subscription-based Mule ESB."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"Oracle Service Bus is a bit expensive"
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
32%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
IBM software can be costly, but having a contract has helped manage and potentially lower costs over time.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
There could be greater flexibility and agility in service creation for the product. As our business requirements evolve, we require more dynamic capabilities to adapt and scale our services accordi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Service Bus?
The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Service Bus?
Oracle Service Bus is expensive but provides value for money. The pricing is comparative to IBM offerings.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Service Bus?
The microservices portion of Oracle Service Bus needs some improvement. Compared to MuleSoft, MuleSoft is much easier to use and deploy than what is currently available in Oracle Service Bus.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Compared 46% of the time
webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo
webMethods.io vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Compared 22% of the time
Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo
Mule ESB vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Compared 12% of the time
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Compared 12% of the time
IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo
IBM BPM vs IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Compared 7% of the time
More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Competitors
Mule ESB vs Oracle Service Bus Logo
Mule ESB vs Oracle Service Bus
Compared 29% of the time
IBM Integration Bus vs Oracle Service Bus Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs Oracle Service Bus
Compared 23% of the time
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Oracle Service Bus Logo
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs Oracle Service Bus
Compared 13% of the time
Red Hat Fuse vs Oracle Service Bus Logo
Red Hat Fuse vs Oracle Service Bus
Compared 11% of the time
webMethods.io vs Oracle Service Bus Logo
webMethods.io vs Oracle Service Bus
Compared 10% of the time
More Oracle Service Bus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere Message Broker
March 2025
IBM WebSphere Message Broker reportDownload IBM WebSphere Message Broker product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Service Bus
March 2025
Oracle Service Bus reportDownload Oracle Service Bus product report
 

Also Known As

WebSphere Message Broker
No data available
 

Overview

WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.
IBM

Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.

Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire
MakeMyTrip Ltd., Griffith University, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Pacfico Seguros Generales, IGEPA IT-SERVICE GmbH, Guangzhou Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Pacfico Seguros Generales, Bank Audi S.A.L., Rydges Sydney Airport, Intelligent Pathways, Nacional Monte de Piedad IAP
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle Service Bus
March 2025
Free Report: IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle Service Bus
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.