Imprivata OneSign vs OneLogin by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Imprivata and One Identity are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Imprivata is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while One Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Imprivata holds a 2.5% mindshare in SSO, compared to One Identity’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imprivata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Imprivata OneSign and OneLogin compete in identity and access management. OneLogin has the upper hand due to its versatility in sectors and advanced security features.

Features: Imprivata OneSign provides single sign-on with AI integration, legacy system compatibility, and secure clinical workflows. OneLogin offers multifactor authentication, adaptive authentication, and automated user provisioning, enhancing security across diverse business environments.

Room for Improvement: Imprivata OneSign could improve by expanding beyond healthcare-specific applications and enhancing its adaptive authentication capabilities. OneLogin may enhance its reporting capabilities, fine-tune integration settings for non-standard applications, and further simplify user management interfaces for even broader user adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imprivata OneSign is straightforward to deploy in healthcare environments with tailored technical support. OneLogin offers flexible cloud-based deployment with extensive documentation, providing proactive customer support and guidance, resulting in higher customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Imprivata OneSign incurs higher initial costs with significant ROI for healthcare institutions seeking streamlined access management. OneLogin offers competitive pricing and flexible subscription models, delivering faster ROI, which appeals to organizations requiring comprehensive security implementations across various sectors.

To learn more, read our detailed Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Duo

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Cisco Duo is 3.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imprivata OneSign is 2.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneLogin by One Identity is 4.6%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin by One Identity	4.6%
Cisco Duo	3.2%
Imprivata OneSign	2.5%
Other	89.7%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Charles Slaustas

Information Technology Contractor at Insight global

Supports seamless authentication for users across multiple organizations and personal portals

The features I use in Cisco Duo include Duo Pushes to confirm my identity to the device, and eventually as MFA security was increased, I actually had to use exchange passcodes. Sometimes, I have to go into the site and get into Cisco Duo to retrieve the passcode, and many of them have been two-factor, where the sites send a passcode that I have to enter into Cisco Duo. It has been more of the latter. I have not seen issues with lagging or crashing on Cisco Duo's end; it was usually on the client end, often because someone set up a bad upgrade or there were connection issues with the Cisco Duo cloud through the administrative site.

Read full review

Rohit Yamsani

Senior Consultant at HCLSoftware

Single sign-on saves time by seamlessly managing passwords and improving workflow efficiency

What I appreciate best about Imprivata OneSign are the single sign-on and the Confirm ID features. The single sign-on works seamlessly for all the nurses or the end users out there. You just have to log in to the application once and the single sign-on clicks in and works for everyone. Users don't have to manually remember all their passwords. Imprivata OneSign helps by remembering and storing all passwords. The integration capabilities of Imprivata OneSign offer many possibilities, and there are numerous upgrades Imprivata has been implementing. At this point, they are growing rapidly. There are new tools coming out for reporting and generating real-time analysis. Imprivata E-PAM is a new feature that I've been reading about in articles, which is going to help administrator people and enterprise administrator personnel to view real-time records and views for all end customers. Reporting and looking at logs for the users will be seamlessly efficient. I use the reporting tools available in Imprivata OneSign. The admin console itself has a reporting feature, which gives us a list of pre-built templates of reports where you can see how many users have been added, the user policy, the users who have last logged in in specific amounts of days, and the reporting for the EPCS users. There are numerous reporting options available which help with troubleshooting issues. I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses. As a nurse or doctor, you don't have to spend time remembering passwords or signing into computers. You just need to grab the nearest machine and tap in. You can use the machine anytime if you want. It saves time when dealing with patients. For doctors who might not be tech-savvy, Imprivata OneSign helps them sign in seamlessly.

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Duo has positively impacted our organization by improving our overall access security by adding an extra layer of protection beyond passwords."

"Since Duo Security provides a single place to log in for our SaaS applications, we don't have to manage user accounts and remember passwords for each specific application."

"Regarding stability and reliability of Cisco Duo, I would say it is 99.9% reliable and stable."

"Cisco Duo's authentication means people cannot get into our network without the second step."

"Since implementing Cisco Duo, it has greatly improved our operational efficiency."

"The feature of Cisco Duo that I prefer the most is the policies, being able to control what we need to within the policies. You can get pretty granular."

"As a former employee, I think it's top-notch when it comes to protecting internal and external threats and preventing unauthorized access to the network."

"The feature that my organization started using more recently in Cisco Duo is offline authentication."

More Cisco Duo pros

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

"I have seen many benefits from using Imprivata OneSign. It saves substantial time for nurses."

"Imprivata supports single sign-on, providing a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using, and the deployment is very quick and not difficult to deploy."

"I have seen fewer support tickets after implementing OneLogin, which have been reduced by 60 to 70 percent compared to the previous method."

"I feel that switching to OneLogin is a good move for us in terms of centralized access and identity management, and since we have transitioned to OneLogin, it has greatly reduced our manual work and offloaded much of our IT tasks."

"Overall, OneLogin by One Identity is doing a very good job in helping customers manage their identities, which is one of the most critical attack surfaces nowadays with the growing threat landscapes."

"The solution helped save money for our organization, either by optimizing time-intensive processes or by increasing productivity."

"OneLogin is a highly pragmatic workforce identity engine that eliminates manual authentication debt across fragmented infrastructure securely."

"One aspect I particularly appreciate is their exceptional customer support whenever I've needed assistance."

"OneLogin is user-friendly, and any administrator can handle it easily."

"OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by improving both security and user convenience."

More OneLogin by One Identity pros

Cons

"I have not seen ROI with Cisco Duo; probably the opposite, because it impedes productivity time to be able to get into the system. You have to authenticate and do your regular login and your Active Directory logins."

"Cisco Duo could be improved by building the agent with the many agents we already use, such as Cisco AMP and Cisco Secure Client, which would simplify our environment by eliminating the need for a third agent for secure applications."

"Cisco can further enhance the integrations, as they possess exceptional integrations with various providers' products and feature sets."

"I think Cisco Duo can be improved by integrating it more with developer tools; there is not a lot in terms of developer tooling with respect to authenticating to command line toolsets."

"There is always room for improvement."

"For a non-prepared, non-technical user, it could be tricky and quite complex."

"One area that might be improved is that setting up SMS texting is not as easy as using the app, even though it does support it."

"Sometimes, it's a little harder for customers to adopt."

More Cisco Duo cons

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

"Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for VDI connectivity, but I've seen issues with VDI connectivity and Citrix storefront connectivity."

"They should have a landing page."

"During implementation, there were not many features that I remember not using in practice."

"The tool must be made more robust."

"Sometimes there is a slight delay in getting the code, but overall it is smooth and reliable."

"OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process."

"I think OneLogin is good, but it would be better if it could provide a mobile app that includes specific features, for example, to check logs or compliance."

"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."

"OneLogin could be improved with a more intuitive admin interface and simpler configuration for advanced integrations and policies."

"If not, I don't think that's a product that should be released for Mac because you can't do patching and postpone the patching just because they still haven't figured out their tool."

More OneLogin by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable. It is not highly expensive."

"Their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing costs."

"I am not aware of the pricing. There are two departments, and I don't have any information about them."

"Cisco has the most expensive products because market leaders tend to charge a lot."

"I haven't seen it in a while, but it's at par with everything else licensing-wise."

"It falls in line with everything else."

"Price wise, it's not cheap, but it's not expensive at all either. It's in the middle."

"The licensing is very good because it does not cost a lot of money. It's affordable for all-sized customers, including enterprises. There is an additional cost for premium support."

More Cisco Duo pricing and cost advice

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

22%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	82

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	140
Midsize Enterprise	41
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Du...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Duo Security?

Regarding the pricing, what actually happened was that we got the product purchased through our HQ, so the costing as...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Duo Security?

I do not have a straight answer for how Cisco Duo can be improved at this time. With the implementation that we are g...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imprivata OneSign?

Fast user switching and Citrix integration in Imprivata OneSign could improve. There are many options available for V...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Imprivata OneSign?

I have experience with Imprivata OneSign and Imprivata Confirm ID. For the past three and a half years, I've been usi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imprivata OneSign?

As an end user, it's easy to use Imprivata OneSign. Users don't have to rely much on knowledge to use that tool. It's...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

One area for improvement for OneLogin by One Identity is the integration complexity; having clearer documentation, pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

My main use case for OneLogin by One Identity is for identity and access management, which establishes clear rules fo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

My advice for others considering OneLogin by One Identity is that it is a good choice, with reasonable pricing around...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Cisco Duo

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Cisco Duo

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Cisco Duo

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Cisco Duo

Compared 3% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Cisco Duo

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Duo Competitors

Okta Platform vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 12% of the time

BlueFletch vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 3% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Identity Manager by One Identity vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More OneLogin by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Duo

November 2026

Download Cisco Duo product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

November 2026

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin by One Identity

October 2026

Download OneLogin by One Identity product report

Also Known As

Duo Security

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

Cisco Duo is a cloud-based identity security platform safeguarding critical resources for any user and device worldwide. Known for its ease of use, Duo offers seamless protection across multi-cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments.

Cisco Duo is designed to secure access with identity-first protection and provides extensive visibility throughout an organization's identity ecosystem. Offering multi-factor authentication, Duo facilitates easy integration and management, allowing teams to protect data effectively on VPNs, applications, and networks. Its single-pane management improves security processes while enhancing trust, making it suitable for diverse IT infrastructures.

What are the key features of Cisco Duo?

Multi-factor Authentication: Strengthens user verification with multiple methods.
Push Notifications: Simplifies authentication with quick approvals.
Single Sign-On: Enhances convenience by allowing one set of credentials.
VPN Access: Secures remote connections with reliable authentication.
User Activity Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights into access patterns.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Quick Deployment: Facilitates rapid integration within existing systems.
Effective Management: Streamlines IT operations with centralized control.
Regulatory Compliance: Aids in meeting industry standards for data protection.
Enhanced Trust: Strengthens security posture across networks.
User-friendly Approach: Simplifies authentication for non-technical users.

In industries like education and finance, Cisco Duo is widely employed to secure multi-factor authentication across platforms such as email, databases, and servers. Its integration capabilities with Microsoft 365, Active Directory, and VPNs like AnyConnect are instrumental in verifying user identities using mobile apps or OTPs, catering effectively to both remote and on-premise environments.

Cisco

Imprivata OneSign provides single sign-on, streamlining application access through AI-managed passwords. It supports legacy systems, enhances security, and saves time, especially valuable for healthcare. Confirm ID and reporting tools enable seamless integration and user activity tracking.

Imprivata OneSign is a comprehensive single sign-on and multi-factor authentication platform that simplifies password management and streamlines user access to over fifty applications. Designed primarily for healthcare, it integrates with both cloud and on-premises systems, offering upgraded versions like G4 23.7 with advanced security features such as MFA and Vasco tokens. Although its price point is higher and Mac OS compatibility is limited, it improves focus on patient care by reducing administrative burdens. Challenges include fast user switching, Citrix integration lag, and authentication slowness with published applications.

What are Imprivata OneSign's key features?

Single Sign-On: Access multiple applications with one ID, enhancing security and efficiency.
AI-Managed Passwords: Automates password entry, reducing manual input and errors.
Legacy System Integration: Enhances security and eases transitions with existing systems.
Confirm ID: Ensures seamless and secure end-user authentication.
E-PAM & Reporting Tools: Tracks user activity to optimize system use.

What benefits should users look for in OneSign reviews?

Enhanced Security: Combines single sign-on with MFA and Vasco tokens for improved data protection.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on administrative tasks, focusing resource allocation on patient care.
Scalability: Supports cloud and on-premises deployments, accommodating growing IT infrastructures.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT systems while offering advanced security features.

Imprivata OneSign is especially impactful in healthcare settings, where quick access to applications without sacrificing security is crucial. It facilitates e-prescribing and other clinical tasks through streamlined processes and advanced authentication measures, ensuring that patient care remains the primary focus.

Imprivata

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Buyer's Guide

Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity

November 2026

Free Report: Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin by One Identity report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.